开发者:上海品职教育科技有限公司 隐私政策详情

应用版本:4.2.11(IOS)|3.2.5(安卓)APP下载

Brownie · 2022年03月31日

如果考试遇到这个题需要把计算过程写出来吗?

NO.PZ2021090803000002

问题如下:

Private wealth manager Udaga Wacho is discussing a decumulation strategy with client Dogenza Ka. The strategy involves two of Ka’s accounts, a taxable account and a tax-exempt account, and will allow Ka to withdraw $200,000 each year. Both accounts have a current balance of $1 million.

Ka asks Wacho if he should withdraw funds from the taxable account first until it is depleted prior to withdrawing from the tax-exempt account, or vice versa. Wacho reviews the accounts to make a recommendation; he assumes a fixed, pre-tax rate of return of 10% for both accounts and that earnings in the taxable account are taxed at a fixed effective rate of 25%. Wacho recommends that Ka withdraw funds from the taxable account first until it is depleted prior to withdrawing from the tax-exempt account.

Discuss why Wacho’s recommended decumulation strategy is the more tax-efficient strategy.

解释:

Wacho’s recommendation to withdraw funds from the taxable account first until it is depleted prior to withdrawing from the tax-exempt account is the more tax-efficient decumulation strategy. The tax-exempt account will compound at a higher rate (the pre-tax rate of 10%) than the taxable account (with an after-tax rate of 10% × (1 − 0.25) = 7.5%). With a fixed tax rate, it is optimal to make withdrawals from the taxable account first and allow the tax-exempt account to continue to compound. The two tables below demonstrate this outcome over the first 10 years: At the end of 10 years, the ending balance is larger under the tax-aware strategy ($1,800,752) than under the tax-indifferent strategy ($1,480,097).


如果考试遇到这个题需要把计算过程写出来吗?

2 个答案

王暄_品职助教 · 2023年12月19日

请问助教老师,1)如果不写出计算过程,只是阐明清楚理由(taxable account和 tax-exempt account所导致的税收差异的逻辑)可以吗?

如果没有计算过程,可以阐述清楚,完全可以


2)感觉这个计算还是很长的,考试过程中时间上不知道来得及不。这道题没有说必须要计算,感觉也没有明显暗示要计算??(还是我对题干不够敏锐?)不写计算的话,会扣分很多吗

只要可以清楚的写出答案和理由,可以不写计算过程

[一梦千寻] · 2023年12月19日

谢谢您~

王暄_品职助教 · 2022年04月01日

最好能够写出来,一般来说这种题目会让你先选一个,然后写理由,理由的话你直接写出计算最直接

[一梦千寻] · 2023年12月19日

请问助教老师,1)如果不写出计算过程,只是阐明清楚理由(taxable account和 tax-exempt account所导致的税收差异的逻辑)可以吗?2)感觉这个计算还是很长的,考试过程中时间上不知道来得及不。这道题没有说必须要计算,感觉也没有明显暗示要计算??(还是我对题干不够敏锐?)不写计算的话,会扣分很多吗

  • 2

    回答
  • 3

    关注
  • 1768

    浏览
相关问题

NO.PZ2021090803000002 问题如下 Private wealth manager Uga Wacho is scussing a cumulation strategy with client genza KThe strategy involves two of Ka’s accounts, a taxable account ana tax-exempt account, anwill allow Ka to with$200,000 eayear. Both accounts have a current balanof $1 million.Ka asks Wacho if he shoulwithfun from the taxable account first until it is pleteprior to withawing from the tax-exempt account, or viversWacho reviews the accounts to make a recommention; he assumes a fixe pre-trate of return of 10% for both accounts anthearnings in the taxable account are taxea fixeeffective rate of 25%. Wacho recommen thKa withfun from the taxable account first until it is pleteprior to withawing from the tax-exempt account. scuss why Wacho’s recommencumulation strategy is the more tax-efficient strategy. Wacho’s recommention to withfun from the taxable account first until it is pleteprior to withawing from the tax-exempt account is the more tax-efficient cumulation strategy. The tax-exempt account will compouna higher rate (the pre-trate of 10%) ththe taxable account (with after-trate of 10% × (1 − 0.25) = 7.5%). With a fixetrate, it is optimto make withawals from the taxable account first anallow the tax-exempt account to continue to compoun The two tables below monstrate this outcome over the first 10 years: the enof 10 years, the enng balanis larger unr the tax-aware strategy ($1,800,752) thunr the tax-infferent strategy ($1,480,097). 如题,在A方法中,麻烦老师列出year-entaxable account balan在第一年那一行中的875,000怎么算出来的

2024-05-23 11:29 1 · 回答

NO.PZ2021090803000002 问题如下 Private wealth manager Uga Wacho is scussing a cumulation strategy with client genza KThe strategy involves two of Ka’s accounts, a taxable account ana tax-exempt account, anwill allow Ka to with$200,000 eayear. Both accounts have a current balanof $1 million.Ka asks Wacho if he shoulwithfun from the taxable account first until it is pleteprior to withawing from the tax-exempt account, or viversWacho reviews the accounts to make a recommention; he assumes a fixe pre-trate of return of 10% for both accounts anthearnings in the taxable account are taxea fixeeffective rate of 25%. Wacho recommen thKa withfun from the taxable account first until it is pleteprior to withawing from the tax-exempt account. scuss why Wacho’s recommencumulation strategy is the more tax-efficient strategy. Wacho’s recommention to withfun from the taxable account first until it is pleteprior to withawing from the tax-exempt account is the more tax-efficient cumulation strategy. The tax-exempt account will compouna higher rate (the pre-trate of 10%) ththe taxable account (with after-trate of 10% × (1 − 0.25) = 7.5%). With a fixetrate, it is optimto make withawals from the taxable account first anallow the tax-exempt account to continue to compoun The two tables below monstrate this outcome over the first 10 years: the enof 10 years, the enng balanis larger unr the tax-aware strategy ($1,800,752) thunr the tax-infferent strategy ($1,480,097). rt

2024-03-08 13:49 1 · 回答

NO.PZ2021090803000002问题如下 Private wealth manager Uga Wacho is scussing a cumulation strategy with client genza KThe strategy involves two of Ka’s accounts, a taxable account ana tax-exempt account, anwill allow Ka to with$200,000 eayear. Both accounts have a current balanof $1 million.Ka asks Wacho if he shoulwithfun from the taxable account first until it is pleteprior to withawing from the tax-exempt account, or viversWacho reviews the accounts to make a recommention; he assumes a fixe pre-trate of return of 10% for both accounts anthearnings in the taxable account are taxea fixeeffective rate of 25%. Wacho recommen thKa withfun from the taxable account first until it is pleteprior to withawing from the tax-exempt account. scuss why Wacho’s recommencumulation strategy is the more tax-efficient strategy. Wacho’s recommention to withfun from the taxable account first until it is pleteprior to withawing from the tax-exempt account is the more tax-efficient cumulation strategy. The tax-exempt account will compouna higher rate (the pre-trate of 10%) ththe taxable account (with after-trate of 10% × (1 − 0.25) = 7.5%). With a fixetrate, it is optimto make withawals from the taxable account first anallow the tax-exempt account to continue to compoun The two tables below monstrate this outcome over the first 10 years: the enof 10 years, the enng balanis larger unr the tax-aware strategy ($1,800,752) thunr the tax-infferent strategy ($1,480,097). 老师,请问101585和51283两个数是怎么算出来的

2023-11-24 17:19 2 · 回答

NO.PZ2021090803000002 没有看懂 可以详细一下吗

2022-03-13 08:19 1 · 回答