开发者:上海品职教育科技有限公司 隐私政策详情

应用版本:4.2.11(IOS)|3.2.5(安卓)APP下载

wuzx · 2022年03月27日

这道题看不懂

NO.PZ2020011303000055

问题如下:

A one-year project has a 3% chance of losing USD 10million, a 7% chance of losing USD 3 million, and a 90% chance of gaining USD 1 million.

Situation 1:We can calculate that the VaR is USD 3 million and the expected shortfall (USD) is 7.2 when the confidence level is 95% and the time horizon is one year.

Situation 2:Suppose that there are two independent identical investments with the properties.We can calculate:


The VaR is 9 and ES is 9.534.

Q:Check whether (a) VaR or (b) expected shortfall satisfy the subadditivity axiom for a coherent risk measure for the investments.

解释:

VaR does not satisfy the subadditivity condition because the VaR for two portfolios combined (9) is greater than the sum of the VaR for each portfolio individually(i.e.,9>3+3). Meanwhile, expected shortfall does satisfy the condition because its value for the two portfolios combined is less than the sum of each portfolios expected shortfall (i.e.,9.534 < 7.2 + 7.2).

解题思路是什么?麻烦老师说一下

1 个答案
已采纳答案

李坏_品职助教 · 2022年03月28日

嗨,努力学习的PZer你好:


题干说的是,一个投资项目有3%的概率损失10million,7%的概率损失3million,90%的概率获利1million。

  1. 我们已经算出var是3million,ES是7.2million。置信度是95%,期限为1年。
  2. 假定有2个独立的投资项目都具有这种属性。

然后题目把这两个独立的投资项目合在一起算,得出新的var是9,ES是9.534. 问你:VaR和ES是否满足次可加性(subadditivity)? 所谓次可加性就是:f(x+y) < f(x) + f(y).


解答:VaR不满足次可加性,因为最后算出来的新的VaR是9,而简单的把两个项目VaR相加的结果是3+3=6.。9大于6.

另外,ES是满足可加性的,因为新的ES是9.534.而把两个项目的ES加起来应该是7.2+7.2 = 14.4,所以整体的ES小于两个点单独的ES之和。


----------------------------------------------
加油吧,让我们一起遇见更好的自己!

  • 1

    回答
  • 0

    关注
  • 347

    浏览
相关问题

NO.PZ2020011303000055问题如下 A one-yeprojeha 3% chanof losing US10million, a 7% chanof losing US3 million, ana 90% chanof gaining US1 million. Situation 1We ccalculate ththe Vis US3 million anthe expecteshortfall (US is 7.2 when the confinlevel is 95% anthe time horizon is one year. Situation 2Suppose ththere are two inpennt inticinvestments with the properties.We ccalculate The Vis 9 anES is 9.534.QChewhether (Vor (expecteshortfall satisfy the subaitivity axiom for a coherent risk measure for the investments. Ves not satisfy the subaitivity contion because the Vfor two portfolios combine(9) is greater ththe sum of the Vfor eaportfolio invially(i.e.,9>3+3). Meanwhile, expecteshortfall es satisfy the contion because its value for the two portfolios combineis less ththe sum of eaportfolio’s expecteshortfall (i.e.,9.534 7.2 + 7.2).在两个问题中,VaR和ES是否满足次可加性?VaR并不满足次可加性,ES满足次可加性。 ES计算不清楚 不同的例子计算方法不同,完全不明白了。

2023-04-05 18:10 1 · 回答

NO.PZ2020011303000055问题如下 A one-yeprojeha 3% chanof losing US10million, a 7% chanof losing US3 million, ana 90% chanof gaining US1 million. Situation 1We ccalculate ththe Vis US3 million anthe expecteshortfall (US is 7.2 when the confinlevel is 95% anthe time horizon is one year. Situation 2Suppose ththere are two inpennt inticinvestments with the properties.We ccalculate The Vis 9 anES is 9.534.QChewhether (Vor (expecteshortfall satisfy the subaitivity axiom for a coherent risk measure for the investments. Ves not satisfy the subaitivity contion because the Vfor two portfolios combine(9) is greater ththe sum of the Vfor eaportfolio invially(i.e.,9>3+3). Meanwhile, expecteshortfall es satisfy the contion because its value for the two portfolios combineis less ththe sum of eaportfolio’s expecteshortfall (i.e.,9.534 7.2 + 7.2).老师您好,我想知道var在什么情况下满足次可加性

2022-05-09 00:30 1 · 回答