开发者:上海品职教育科技有限公司 隐私政策详情

应用版本:4.2.11(IOS)|3.2.5(安卓)APP下载

杨舒芃 · 2022年02月13日

C怎么不对呢 说的没问题啊

NO.PZ2016040301000010

问题如下:

Scott works for a regional brokerage firm. He estimates that Walkton Industries will increase its dividend by US$1.50 a share during the next year. He realizes that this increase is contingent on pending legislation that would, if enacted, give Walkton a substantial tax break. The US representative for Walkton’s home district has told Scott that, although she is lobbying hard for the bill and prospects for its passage are favorable, concern of the US Congress over the federal deficit could cause the tax bill to be voted down. Walkton Industries has not made any statements about a change in dividend policy. Scott writes in his research report, "We expect Walkton’s stock price to rise by at least US$8.00 a share by the end of the year because the dividend will increase by US$1.50 a share. Investors buying the stock at the current time should expect to realize a total return of at least 15% on the stock." According to the Standards:

选项:

A.

Scott violated the Standards because he used material inside information.

B.

Scott violated the Standards because he failed to separate opinion from fact.

C.

Scott violated the Standards by basing his research on uncertain predictions of future government action.

解释:

B is correct.

This question relates to Standard V(B) –Communication with Clients and Prospective Clients. Scott has issued a research report stating that he expects the price of Walkton Industries stock to rise by US$8 a share "because the dividend will increase" by US$1.50 per share. He has made this statement knowing that the dividend will increase only if Congress enacts certain legislation, an uncertain prospect. By stating that the dividend will increase, Scott failed to separate fact from opinion.

The information regarding passage of legislation is not material nonpublic information because it is conjecture, and the question does not state whether the US representative gave Scott her opinion on the passage of the legislation in confidence. She could have been offering this opinion to anyone who asked. Therefore, statement A is incorrect. It may be acceptable to base a recommendation, in part, on an expectation of future events, even though they may be uncertain. Therefore, answer C is incorrect.

C怎么不对呢 说的没问题啊

1 个答案

王暄_品职助教 · 2022年02月14日

C说Scott的研究是基于对将来政府行为的不确定的预期,这没问题。几乎所有的研究员在做研究的时候都是基于对将来的不确定的预期,也正是因为大家的预期不同才会有股市的涨跌,这完全没问题。

本题错在他说:dividend will increase by $1.5

他估计股价会涨是没错的,因为说明了是估计出来的。但他的estimation是根据“dividend will increase by $1.5 per share”,这个就不对了。因为dividend是否会增加$1.5,也是估计出来的。这里他表现得跟他很确定知道dividend会涨$1.5似的。

  • 1

    回答
  • 0

    关注
  • 550

    浏览
相关问题

老师,我对答案的理解是,如果把对未来的预测放在researreport里,那么就是fail to separate opinion from fact。这个理解对吗? 假如,S把预测当作承诺放入researreport里,这属于违法什么呢?

2020-08-29 19:58 1 · 回答

Scott violatethe Stanr because he faileto separate opinion from fact. Scott violatethe Stanr basing his researon uncertain prections of future government action. B is correct. This question relates to StanrV(–Communication with Clients anProspective Clients. Scott hissuea researreport stating thhe expects the priof Walkton Instries stoto rise US$8 a share \"because the vinwill increase\" US$1.50 per share. He hma this statement knowing ththe vinwill increase only if Congress enacts certain legislation, uncertain prospect. stating ththe vinwill increase, Scott faileto separate fafrom opinion. The information regarng passage of legislation is not materinonpublic information because it is conjecture, anthe question es not state whether the US representative gave Scott her opinion on the passage of the legislation in confince. She coulhave been offering this opinion to anyone who aske Therefore, statement A is incorrect. It macceptable to base a recommention, in part, on expectation of future events, even though they muncertain. Therefore, answer C is incorrect. 老师,画红线部门是不是也违反co anstanr?不应该向客户承诺收益率?

2020-08-25 14:39 1 · 回答

Scott violatethe Stanr because he faileto separate opinion from fact. Scott violatethe Stanr basing his researon uncertain prections of future government action. B is correct. This question relates to StanrV(–Communication with Clients anProspective Clients. Scott hissuea researreport stating thhe expects the priof Walkton Instries stoto rise US$8 a share \"because the vinwill increase\" US$1.50 per share. He hma this statement knowing ththe vinwill increase only if Congress enacts certain legislation, uncertain prospect. stating ththe vinwill increase, Scott faileto separate fafrom opinion. The information regarng passage of legislation is not materinonpublic information because it is conjecture, anthe question es not state whether the US representative gave Scott her opinion on the passage of the legislation in confince. She coulhave been offering this opinion to anyone who aske Therefore, statement A is incorrect. It macceptable to base a recommention, in part, on expectation of future events, even though they muncertain. Therefore, answer C is incorrect. 这里为什么不属于利用内幕信息呢?这个分红政策公司并未对外公布

2020-06-09 17:56 1 · 回答

为什么C不对呢?他不是认为contingent on legislation

2018-06-14 08:01 1 · 回答