开发者:上海品职教育科技有限公司 隐私政策详情

应用版本:4.2.11(IOS)|3.2.5(安卓)APP下载

moon · 2021年12月10日

AA

* 问题详情,请 查看题干

NO.PZ201805280100000402

问题如下:

The Fordhart portfolio has a market value of $2 billion. After his annual meeting

with its investment committee, DuBord notes the following points:

Fordhart must spend 3% of its beginning-of-the-year asset value annually to meet legal obligations.

The investment committee seeks exposure to private equity investments and requests that DuBord review the CFQ Private Equity Fund as a potential new investment.

Enrollment is strong and growing, leading to increased operating revenues from tuition.

A recent legal settlement eliminated an annual obligation of $50 million from the portfolio to support a biodigester used in the university’s Center for Renewable Energy. \

DuBord instructs his second junior analyst to formulate new allocations for

Fordhart. This analyst proposes the allocation presented in Exhibit 2.

Discuss two reasons why the proposed asset allocation is inappropriate for Fordhart.

选项:

解释:

The proposed asset allocation for Fordhart is inappropriate because:

1 Given the increasing enrollment trends and recent favorable legal settlement, Fordhart will likely require lower liquidity in the future. The proposed allocation shifts Fordhart’s portfolio away from risky assets (decreases the relative equity holdings and increases the relative bond holdings).

2 The proposed 10% allocation to private equity creates an overly concentrated position in the underlying investment. A 10% allocation to the CFQ Private Equity Fund is $200 million (10% of Fordhart’s $2 billion). The CFQ Private Equity Fund has assets under management (AUM) of $500 million. Hence, Fordhart would own 40% of the entire CFQ Private Equity Fund. This position exposes both Fordhart and the CFQ fund to an undesirable level of operational risk.

答案是说:Fordhart will likely require lower liquidity in the future. The proposed allocation shifts Fordhart’s portfolio away from risky assets (decreases the relative equity holdings and increases the relative bond holdings).


但是: 因为每年的负债下降了50m,捐赠基金的收入很多,所以流动性要求没有那么高,难道不是可以投资一些equity,应该提高equity的比例?

2 个答案

郭静_品职助教 · 2021年12月16日

嗨,爱思考的PZer你好:


是的

----------------------------------------------
加油吧,让我们一起遇见更好的自己!

郭静_品职助教 · 2021年12月12日

嗨,努力学习的PZer你好:


如果有听何老师对应的课后习题视频讲解,就会发现确实是这么建议的:法律监管要求放松和预期未来有更多的学生注册人数,因而对于基金流动性的要求降低,可以更多的投资到Equity。

但是题目中建议新的配置方案,是将更多的资金投入到了投资级别债券(由49%上升到了59%),而Equity的比例下降(大盘股基金和私募基金加起来从49%下降为39%),并不符合第一段所说的基金流动性要求降低的趋势。

本题问的是,请说出两个理由,为什么建议的资产配置方案不适合Fordhart?

原文答案Given the increasing enrollment trends and recent favorable legal settlement, Fordhart will likely require lower liquidity in the future. The proposed allocation shifts Fordhart’s portfolio away from risky assets (decreases the relative equity holdings and increases the relative bond holdings).这个就是它不适合Fordhart的理由之一,翻译是:F对于未来流动性要求降低。但他建议的资产配置方案却是将F组合从风险性资产转移走了(降低了Equity资产,而增加了Bond)。

----------------------------------------------
努力的时光都是限量版,加油!

moon · 2021年12月15日

所以这个方案不适合F的原因就是:他的流动性需求降低了,应该可以多投equity,但是建议的配置方案是少投了equity,所以建议的配置方案不对?

  • 2

    回答
  • 0

    关注
  • 758

    浏览
相关问题

NO.PZ201805280100000402 问题如下 The Forart portfolio ha market valueof $2 billion. After his annumeetingwith its investment committee, Bornotesthe following points:■ Forart must spen3% of itsbeginning-of-the-yeasset value annually to meet legobligations.■ The investment committee seeks exposureto private equity investments anrequests thBorreview the CFQ PrivateEquity Funa potentinew investment.■ Enrollment is strong angrowing, leangto increaseoperating revenues from tuition.■ A recent legsettlement eliminateanannuobligation of $50 million from the portfolio to support a biogesterusein the university’s Center for Renewable Energy. \Borinstructs his seconjunior analystto formulate new allocations forForart. This analyst proposes theallocation presentein Exhibit 2.scuss two reasons why the proposeassetallocation is inappropriate for Forart. The proposeasset allocation for Forartis inappropriate because:1 Given the increasing enrollment trenanrecent favorable legsettlement, Forart will likely require lowerliquity in the future. The proposeallocation shifts Forart’s portfolioawfrom risky assets (creases the relative equity holngs anincreasesthe relative bonholngs).2 The propose10% allocation to privateequity creates overly concentrateposition in the unrlying investment. A10% allocation to the CFQ Private Equity Funis $200 million (10% ofForart’s $2 billion). The CFQ Private Equity Funhassets unr management(AUM) of $500 million. Hence, Forart woulown 40% of the entire CFQ PrivateEquity Fun This position exposes both Forart anthe CFQ funto anunsirable level of operationrisk. The propose10% allocation to private equity creates overly concentrateposition in the unrlying investment. A 10% allocation to the CFQ Private Equity Funis $200 million (10% of Forart’s $2 billion). The CFQ Private Equity Funhassets unr management (AUM) of $500 million. Hence, Forart woulown 40% of the entire CFQ Private Equity Fun This position exposes both Forart anthe CFQ funto unsirable level of operationrisk.是算在Regulatory another externconsirations这里么

2024-11-03 21:14 1 · 回答

NO.PZ201805280100000402 问题如下 The Forart portfolio ha market valueof $2 billion. After his annumeetingwith its investment committee, Bornotesthe following points:■ Forart must spen3% of itsbeginning-of-the-yeasset value annually to meet legobligations.■ The investment committee seeks exposureto private equity investments anrequests thBorreview the CFQ PrivateEquity Funa potentinew investment.■ Enrollment is strong angrowing, leangto increaseoperating revenues from tuition.■ A recent legsettlement eliminateanannuobligation of $50 million from the portfolio to support a biogesterusein the university’s Center for Renewable Energy. \Borinstructs his seconjunior analystto formulate new allocations forForart. This analyst proposes theallocation presentein Exhibit 2.scuss two reasons why the proposeassetallocation is inappropriate for Forart. The proposeasset allocation for Forartis inappropriate because:1 Given the increasing enrollment trenanrecent favorable legsettlement, Forart will likely require lowerliquity in the future. The proposeallocation shifts Forart’s portfolioawfrom risky assets (creases the relative equity holngs anincreasesthe relative bonholngs).2 The propose10% allocation to privateequity creates overly concentrateposition in the unrlying investment. A10% allocation to the CFQ Private Equity Funis $200 million (10% ofForart’s $2 billion). The CFQ Private Equity Funhassets unr management(AUM) of $500 million. Hence, Forart woulown 40% of the entire CFQ PrivateEquity Fun This position exposes both Forart anthe CFQ funto anunsirable level of operationrisk. 1.题干中没有找到CFQ 500 million信息,为什么说CFQ 500 million?2.40%比例,就说会导致运营风险,为啥?

2024-09-24 14:15 1 · 回答

NO.PZ201805280100000402 问题如下 The Forart portfolio ha market valueof $2 billion. After his annumeetingwith its investment committee, Bornotesthe following points:■ Forart must spen3% of itsbeginning-of-the-yeasset value annually to meet legobligations.■ The investment committee seeks exposureto private equity investments anrequests thBorreview the CFQ PrivateEquity Funa potentinew investment.■ Enrollment is strong angrowing, leangto increaseoperating revenues from tuition.■ A recent legsettlement eliminateanannuobligation of $50 million from the portfolio to support a biogesterusein the university’s Center for Renewable Energy. \Borinstructs his seconjunior analystto formulate new allocations forForart. This analyst proposes theallocation presentein Exhibit 2.scuss two reasons why the proposeassetallocation is inappropriate for Forart. The proposeasset allocation for Forartis inappropriate because:1 Given the increasing enrollment trenanrecent favorable legsettlement, Forart will likely require lowerliquity in the future. The proposeallocation shifts Forart’s portfolioawfrom risky assets (creases the relative equity holngs anincreasesthe relative bonholngs).2 The propose10% allocation to privateequity creates overly concentrateposition in the unrlying investment. A10% allocation to the CFQ Private Equity Funis $200 million (10% ofForart’s $2 billion). The CFQ Private Equity Funhassets unr management(AUM) of $500 million. Hence, Forart woulown 40% of the entire CFQ PrivateEquity Fun This position exposes both Forart anthe CFQ funto anunsirable level of operationrisk. 请问funsize in billion这一列代表什么?另外funminimum investment没有写单位,PE应该是5m而不是500m吧,那么The CFQ Private Equity Funhassets unr management (AUM) of $500 million又是怎么来的呢?

2023-07-29 12:46 2 · 回答

NO.PZ201805280100000402问题如下 The Forart portfolio ha market valueof $2 billion. After his annumeetingwith its investment committee, Bornotesthe following points:■ Forart must spen3% of itsbeginning-of-the-yeasset value annually to meet legobligations.■ The investment committee seeks exposureto private equity investments anrequests thBorreview the CFQ PrivateEquity Funa potentinew investment.■ Enrollment is strong angrowing, leangto increaseoperating revenues from tuition.■ A recent legsettlement eliminateanannuobligation of $50 million from the portfolio to support a biogesterusein the university’s Center for Renewable Energy. \Borinstructs his seconjunior analystto formulate new allocations forForart. This analyst proposes theallocation presentein Exhibit 2.scuss two reasons why the proposeassetallocation is inappropriate for Forart. The proposeasset allocation for Forartis inappropriate because:1 Given the increasing enrollment trenanrecent favorable legsettlement, Forart will likely require lowerliquity in the future. The proposeallocation shifts Forart’s portfolioawfrom risky assets (creases the relative equity holngs anincreasesthe relative bonholngs).2 The propose10% allocation to privateequity creates overly concentrateposition in the unrlying investment. A10% allocation to the CFQ Private Equity Funis $200 million (10% ofForart’s $2 billion). The CFQ Private Equity Funhassets unr management(AUM) of $500 million. Hence, Forart woulown 40% of the entire CFQ PrivateEquity Fun This position exposes both Forart anthe CFQ funto anunsirable level of operationrisk. 答案中没有对这个定量要求的考虑

2023-02-18 11:36 1 · 回答

NO.PZ201805280100000402问题如下 The Forart portfolio ha market valueof $2 billion. After his annumeetingwith its investment committee, Bornotesthe following points:■ Forart must spen3% of itsbeginning-of-the-yeasset value annually to meet legobligations.■ The investment committee seeks exposureto private equity investments anrequests thBorreview the CFQ PrivateEquity Funa potentinew investment.■ Enrollment is strong angrowing, leangto increaseoperating revenues from tuition.■ A recent legsettlement eliminateanannuobligation of $50 million from the portfolio to support a biogesterusein the university’s Center for Renewable Energy. \Borinstructs his seconjunior analystto formulate new allocations forForart. This analyst proposes theallocation presentein Exhibit 2.scuss two reasons why the proposeassetallocation is inappropriate for Forart. The proposeasset allocation for Forartis inappropriate because:1 Given the increasing enrollment trenanrecent favorable legsettlement, Forart will likely require lowerliquity in the future. The proposeallocation shifts Forart’s portfolioawfrom risky assets (creases the relative equity holngs anincreasesthe relative bonholngs).2 The propose10% allocation to privateequity creates overly concentrateposition in the unrlying investment. A10% allocation to the CFQ Private Equity Funis $200 million (10% ofForart’s $2 billion). The CFQ Private Equity Funhassets unr management(AUM) of $500 million. Hence, Forart woulown 40% of the entire CFQ PrivateEquity Fun This position exposes both Forart anthe CFQ funto anunsirable level of operationrisk. 考虑每年需要对外投资基金价值的3%,cash equivalent fun资比例只要2%,是不是因为投资级别债券能够提供同样的流动性?

2022-09-24 13:34 1 · 回答