开发者:上海品职教育科技有限公司 隐私政策详情

应用版本:4.2.11(IOS)|3.2.5(安卓)APP下载

未命名 · 2021年12月10日

选择

* 问题详情,请 查看题干

NO.PZ201512300100001402

问题如下:

2. Using an asset-based approach, the value (net of debt) of Oakstar is closest to:

选项:

A.

$62,250,000.

B.

$87,250,000.

C.

$199,750,000.

解释:

B is correct.

In the absence of market value data for assets and liabilities, the analyst usually must use book value data (the reading explicitly makes the assumption that book values accurately reflect market values as well). Except for timberland, market values for assets are not available. Thus, all other assets are assumed to be valued by their book values, which sum to $500,000 + $25,000 + $50,000 + $750,000 = $1,325,000. The value of the land is determined by the value of $8,750 per hectare for properties comparable to Oakstar’s. Thus, the value of Oakstar’s land is $8,750 × 10,000 = $87,500,000. Liabilities are assumed to be worth the sum of their book value or $1,575,000. Thus, Estimated value = Total assets  Liabilities = $1,325,000 + $87,500,000-$1,575,000 = $87,250,000.

In addition to the balance sheet, Powell is gathering other data to assist in valuing Oakstar and has found information on recent sales of timberland in the western part of Canada. Douglas fir properties have averaged $6,178 per hectare for tracts that are not contiguous and do not have a developed road system for harvesting the timber. For tracts with these features, as possessed by Oakstar, the average price is $8,750 per hectare. Properties near urban areas and having potential for residential and recreational second home development command up to $20,000 per hectare.

为什么选择8750,而不是6178和20000呢

1 个答案

王园圆_品职助教 · 2021年12月11日

嗨,爱思考的PZer你好:


同学你好,请看以下题干截图

这里说Oakstar和外部森林公司签订了合同来做木材的估值,收割,销售工作,说明Oakstar有个一完整的系统来收获木材。而6178价值对应的是没有收获木材系统的这种林场的每公顷价值,显然和Oaskstar不相符

20000这个价格的要求是林地有潜力被开发成居民住宅和娱乐设施,但是20000这句话后面一句,题目种就明确写了:Oakstar's land lacks this potential。所以20000也不可以被选哦~~


----------------------------------------------
虽然现在很辛苦,但努力过的感觉真的很好,加油!

  • 1

    回答
  • 1

    关注
  • 488

    浏览
相关问题

NO.PZ201512300100001402 $87,250,000. $199,750,000. B is correct. In the absenof market value ta for assets anliabilities, the analyst usually must use book value ta (the reang explicitly makes the assumption thbook values accurately reflemarket values well). Except for timberlan market values for assets are not available. Thus, all other assets are assumeto valuetheir book values, whisum to $500,000 + $25,000 + $50,000 + $750,000 = $1,325,000. The value of the lanis terminethe value of $8,750 per hectare for properties comparable to Oakstar’s. Thus, the value of Oakstar’s lanis $8,750 × 10,000 = $87,500,000. Liabilities are assumeto worth the sum of their book value or $1,575,000. Thus, Estimatevalue = Totassets  Liabilities = $1,325,000 + $87,500,000-$1,575,000 = $87,250,000.Lan位是hectares,不是$,但是按照表格的数据10,000,000加起来,totasset的金额刚好吻合啊

2021-07-29 15:39 1 · 回答

NO.PZ201512300100001402 account payable不是无息负债么,不属于BT,为什么要减掉?

2021-03-07 16:12 1 · 回答

老师,我这边主要有三个问题 1、请问此处为什么不用扣除现金?我看到过往解析中老师”asset baseapproach就是总资产减去总负债,如果是计算EV的话,EV=股权价值+净债务,其中净债务是“有息负债-现金”。注意区分“。想问下所谓的区别在哪里?asset baseapproach计算出的也是EV吧。。我理解的EV=V(equity)+V(liability), 此处的V(liability)是liability的market value(只是因为通常没有market value才近似用liability的book value),为什么这里老师解析是要用净债务?这在基础班哪页讲义中?为什么我一点印象都没有。。。 2、另外讲义中似乎对asset base法没有过多说明,看本题解析,在实际计算时是有market value的按照market value,没有的就按照Book value,是这样吗?

2020-11-25 19:07 1 · 回答

请问什么时候需要减去现金及等价物?我翻了一下笔记,只找到了EV=E-cash,其余更详细的部分没找到(比如是哪一个知识点)。

2020-06-10 07:41 1 · 回答