开发者:上海品职教育科技有限公司 隐私政策详情

应用版本:4.2.11(IOS)|3.2.5(安卓)APP下载

Bluebiubiu · 2021年11月19日

NO.PZ201602060100001002 FRA

* 问题详情,请 查看题干

NO.PZ201602060100001002

问题如下:

NinMount’s long-term debt to equity ratio on 31 December 2018 most likely will be lowest if the results of the acquisition are reported using:

选项:

A.

the equity method.

B.

consolidation with full goodwill.

C.

consolidation with partial goodwill.

解释:

A is correct.

Using the equity method, long-term debt to equity = £600/£1,430 = 0.42. Using the consolidation method, long-term debt to equity = long-term debt/equity = £1,000/£1,750 = 0.57. Equity includes the £320 noncontrolling interest under either consolidation. It does not matter if the full or partial goodwill method is used since there is no goodwill.

考点 : 不同的会计方法对财务比率的影响

解析 :

2018年末也就是投资发生的时点。equity method是one-line consolidation,只在投资公司的资产中增加一项investment in associate,cash减少相同金额。不对被投资公司的资产和负债进行合并。如果使用equity method,直接用NinMoun自己的debt和equity相除:long-term debt to equity= £600/£1,430 = 0.42

如果使用consolidation method,因为百分百合并了子公司的资产和负债,但其实只支付了50%投资比例所对应的cash,因此资产端会多一块,需要在母公司equity里增加MI(Minority interest)来调平。equity=£1,430+320MI =£1,750

long-term debt to equity=(£600+£400)/£1,750 = 0.57

※ 计算MI的方法:

MI计算公式有两个,分别对应full goodwill method和partial goodwill method,但本案例中没有产生goodwill(具体原因可以看上一小问的解析),因此不管是full goodwill method还是partial goodwill method,两种计量方法得到的MI相同。换句话说,只有在存在goodwill的情况下,不同goodwill计量方法下的MI才有区别。从计算公式来看:

full goodwill method下:MI =(acquisition cost / % of interests acquired) × (% of non-controlling interest)

partial goodwill method下:MI = FV of net identifiable assets × (% of non-controlling interest)

本题中没有goodwill,acquisition cost/% of interests acquired=FV of net identifiable assets=320/50%=640,MI=640×50%=320。两种方法计算的MI相同。从这个角度思考的话可以直接排除BC,因为两个选项没有区别。

NO.PZ201602060100001002

问题如下:

NinMount’s long-term debt to equity ratio on 31 December 2018 most likely will be lowest if the results of the acquisition are reported using:

选项:

A.

the equity method.

B.

consolidation with full goodwill.

C.

consolidation with partial goodwill.

解释:

A is correct.

Using the equity method, long-term debt to equity = £600/£1,430 = 0.42. Using the consolidation method, long-term debt to equity = long-term debt/equity = £1,000/£1,750 = 0.57. Equity includes the £320 noncontrolling interest under either consolidation. It does not matter if the full or partial goodwill method is used since there is no goodwill.

考点 : 不同的会计方法对财务比率的影响



请问为什么求equity只加了MI?

母公司本身拥有的股权320已经体现在自己的报表中了吗?

不是没有确定用什么样的方法合并报表吗?



1 个答案

袁园_品职助教 · 2021年11月20日

嗨,从没放弃的小努力你好:


1.这道题就是为了比较不同方法下,财务比率的大小啊,并没有确定是那种方法,我们通过计算equity method和consolidation method 下long-term debt to equity 指标大小做出判断哦。

2.equity只加MI是因为consolidation method下,合并的是子公司的全部资产和负债是100%,相当于包括了自己的股权比例50%所占的资产和负债,也包括了MI剩余的50%所占的资产负债。所以如果要报表平衡,必须在equity把MI也加上去哦


----------------------------------------------
加油吧,让我们一起遇见更好的自己!

  • 1

    回答
  • 0

    关注
  • 613

    浏览
相关问题

NO.PZ201602060100001002 问题如下 PerByron, CFis equity analyst with a UK-baseinvestment firm. One firm Byron follows is NinMount PLa UK-basecompany. On 31 cember 2018, NinMount pai£320 million to purchase a 50 percent stake in Boswell Company. The excess of the purchase priover the fair value of Boswell’s net assets wattributable to previously unrecorlicenses. These licenses were estimateto have economic life of six years. The fair value of Boswell’s assets anliabilities other thlicenses wequto their recorbook values. NinMount anBoswell both use the pounsterling their reporting currenanprepare their financistatements in accornwith IFRS.Byron is concernewhether the investment shoulaffehis \"buy\" rating on NinMount common stock. He knows NinMount coulchoose one of severaccounting metho to report the results of its investment, but NinMount hnot announcewhimethoit will use. Byron forecasts thboth companies’ 2019 financiresults (exclung any merger accounting austments) will inticto those of 2018. NinMount’s anBoswell’s connseincome statements for the yeen31 cember 2018, anconnsebalansheets 31 cember 2018, are presentein Exhibits 1 an2, respectively.Exhibit 1. NinMount PLC anBoswell Company Income Statements for the YeEn31 cember 2018 (£ millions) Exhibit 2. NinMount PLC anBoswell Company BalanSheets 31 cember 2018 (£ millions)Note: Balansheets reflethe purchase pripaiNinMount, but not yet consir the impaof the accounting methochoice. NinMount’s long-term to equity ratio on 31 cember 2018 most likely will lowest if the results of the acquisition are reporteusing: A.the equity metho B.consolition with full gooill. C.consolition with partigooill. A is correct.Using the equity metho long-term to equity = £600/£1,430 = 0.42. Using the consolition metho long-term to equity = long-term bt/equity = £1,000/£1,750 = 0.57. Equity inclus the £320 noncontrolling interest unr either consolition. It es not matter if the full or partigooill methois usesinthere is no gooill. 考点 不同的会计方法对财务比率的影响解析 2018年末也就是投资发生的时点。equity methoone-line consolition,只在投资公司的资产中增加一项investment in associate,cash减少相同金额。不对被投资公司的资产和负债进行合并。如果使用equity metho直接用NinMoun自己的bt和equity相除long-term to equity= £600/£1,430 = 0.42如果使用consolition metho因为百分百合并了子公司的资产和负债,但其实只支付了50%投资比例所对应的cash,因此资产端会多一块,需要在母公司equity里增加MI(Minority interest)来调平。equity=£1,430+320(MI )=£1,750long-term to equity=(£600+£400)/£1,750 = 0.57※ 计算MI的方法MI计算公式有两个,分别对应full gooill methopartigooill metho但本案例中没有产生gooill(具体原因可以看上一小问的解析),因此不管是full gooill metho是partigooill metho两种计量方法得到的MI相同。换句话说,只有在存在gooill的情况下,不同gooill计量方法下的MI才有区别。从计算公式来看full gooill methoMI =(acquisition cost / % of interests acquire × (% of non-controlling interest) partigooill methoMI = FV of net intifiable assets × (% of non-controlling interest)本题中没有gooill,acquisition cost/% of interests acquireFV of net intifiable assets=320/50%=640,MI=640×50%=320。两种方法计算的MI相同。从这个角度思考的话可以直接排除BC,因为两个没有区别。 题目表面拿320买50%的股权,多出的部分算在unrealizelicense里面,多出的部分为320-50%*580 = 30这30是不是得加进子公司报表的intangible asset里面,也就是说子公司的net asset 从 580 变成了610,用这个办法算出的MI是320问题就是并表的时候,子公司报表要不要多记这30的unrealizelicense后,和母公司合并报表

2024-05-24 09:44 2 · 回答

NO.PZ201602060100001002 问题如下 NinMount’s long-term to equity ratio on 31 cember 2018 most likely will lowest if the results of the acquisition are reporteusing: A.the equity metho B.consolition with full gooill. C.consolition with partigooill. A is correct.Using the equity metho long-term to equity = £600/£1,430 = 0.42. Using the consolition metho long-term to equity = long-term bt/equity = £1,000/£1,750 = 0.57. Equity inclus the £320 noncontrolling interest unr either consolition. It es not matter if the full or partigooill methois usesinthere is no gooill. 考点 不同的会计方法对财务比率的影响解析 2018年末也就是投资发生的时点。equity methoone-line consolition,只在投资公司的资产中增加一项investment in associate,cash减少相同金额。不对被投资公司的资产和负债进行合并。如果使用equity metho直接用NinMoun自己的bt和equity相除long-term to equity= £600/£1,430 = 0.42如果使用consolition metho因为百分百合并了子公司的资产和负债,但其实只支付了50%投资比例所对应的cash,因此资产端会多一块,需要在母公司equity里增加MI(Minority interest)来调平。equity=£1,430+320(MI )=£1,750long-term to equity=(£600+£400)/£1,750 = 0.57※ 计算MI的方法MI计算公式有两个,分别对应full gooill methopartigooill metho但本案例中没有产生gooill(具体原因可以看上一小问的解析),因此不管是full gooill metho是partigooill metho两种计量方法得到的MI相同。换句话说,只有在存在gooill的情况下,不同gooill计量方法下的MI才有区别。从计算公式来看full gooill methoMI =(acquisition cost / % of interests acquire × (% of non-controlling interest) partigooill methoMI = FV of net intifiable assets × (% of non-controlling interest)本题中没有gooill,acquisition cost/% of interests acquireFV of net intifiable assets=320/50%=640,MI=640×50%=320。两种方法计算的MI相同。从这个角度思考的话可以直接排除BC,因为两个没有区别。 full gooill methoMI =(acquisition cost / % of interests acquire × (% of non-controlling interest)partigooill methoMI = FV of net intifiable assets × (% of non-controlling interest)

2024-04-08 21:06 1 · 回答

NO.PZ201602060100001002 问题如下 NinMount’s long-term to equity ratio on 31 cember 2018 most likely will lowest if the results of the acquisition are reporteusing: A.the equity metho B.consolition with full gooill. C.consolition with partigooill. A is correct.Using the equity metho long-term to equity = £600/£1,430 = 0.42. Using the consolition metho long-term to equity = long-term bt/equity = £1,000/£1,750 = 0.57. Equity inclus the £320 noncontrolling interest unr either consolition. It es not matter if the full or partigooill methois usesinthere is no gooill. 考点 不同的会计方法对财务比率的影响解析 2018年末也就是投资发生的时点。equity methoone-line consolition,只在投资公司的资产中增加一项investment in associate,cash减少相同金额。不对被投资公司的资产和负债进行合并。如果使用equity metho直接用NinMoun自己的bt和equity相除long-term to equity= £600/£1,430 = 0.42如果使用consolition metho因为百分百合并了子公司的资产和负债,但其实只支付了50%投资比例所对应的cash,因此资产端会多一块,需要在母公司equity里增加MI(Minority interest)来调平。equity=£1,430+320(MI )=£1,750long-term to equity=(£600+£400)/£1,750 = 0.57※ 计算MI的方法MI计算公式有两个,分别对应full gooill methopartigooill metho但本案例中没有产生gooill(具体原因可以看上一小问的解析),因此不管是full gooill metho是partigooill metho两种计量方法得到的MI相同。换句话说,只有在存在gooill的情况下,不同gooill计量方法下的MI才有区别。从计算公式来看full gooill methoMI =(acquisition cost / % of interests acquire × (% of non-controlling interest) partigooill methoMI = FV of net intifiable assets × (% of non-controlling interest)本题中没有gooill,acquisition cost/% of interests acquireFV of net intifiable assets=320/50%=640,MI=640×50%=320。两种方法计算的MI相同。从这个角度思考的话可以直接排除BC,因为两个没有区别。 老师好,这道题1)部分GW,为什么不是用Equity的580*50%?

2023-06-25 10:10 1 · 回答

NO.PZ201602060100001002 请问在equity metho,子公司NI的50%,要调整到母公司的investment当中,B/S中,左半部分Asset由于investment的增加而增加,那么右半部分不应也要增加相应的Equity,B/S左右两边才能对等吗?

2022-01-31 16:48 2 · 回答

NO.PZ201602060100001002 这题中母公司的equity=1430+320,是因为580要先加上之前没记上的那个资产60吗,然后(580+60)*0.5=320?

2021-12-20 14:49 1 · 回答