开发者:上海品职教育科技有限公司 隐私政策详情

应用版本:4.2.11(IOS)|3.2.5(安卓)APP下载

随波主流 · 2021年10月22日

A选项为什么不对呢

NO.PZ2019012201000079

问题如下:

Which of following is correct regarding on Implementation Constraints?

选项:

A.

Twice the absolute risk will lead to twice the return.

B.

Markowitz efficient frontier shows that the relationship between return and risk is convex.

C.

There is a level of leverage beyond which volatility reduces expected returns.

解释:

C is corrent. Portfolios may face implementation constraints that decrease the IR if active risk increases beyond a specific level; Portfolios with high absolute risk targets face limited diversification opportunities, which may lead to a decrease in the SR. There is a level of leverage beyond which volatility reduces expected returns.

主要是说当杠杆过高,虽然可能会带来收益,但是风险也会增加,带来更大的波动,反而会降低收益。打个比方,昨天跌了10%,今天涨了10%,看起来好像是一样的。但是实际不是一回事,反而是亏损的(亏损1%),加杠杆后会进一步降低收益。

There may be constraints that prevent Manager A from scaling his active weights.So twice the absolute risk will not lead to twice the return, Markowitz efficient frontier shows that the relationship between return and risk is concave.

A选项也应该没有错吧,为啥不选A呢
1 个答案
已采纳答案

笛子_品职助教 · 2021年10月22日

嗨,努力学习的PZer你好:


两倍风险不能带来两倍收益,风险(波动率)线性增加,收益并不会线性增加。


关于这个问题,书本上专门有一个公式,见以下截图(强化班讲义27页)。





----------------------------------------------
加油吧,让我们一起遇见更好的自己!

  • 1

    回答
  • 1

    关注
  • 403

    浏览
相关问题

NO.PZ2019012201000079 问题如下 Whiof following is correregarng on Implementation Constraints? A.Twithe absolute risk will leto twithe return. B.Markowitz efficient frontier shows ththe relationship between return anrisk is convex. C.There is a level of leverage beyonwhivolatility reces expectereturns. C is corrent. Portfolios mfaimplementation constraints thcrease the IR if active risk increases beyona specific level; Portfolios with high absolute risk targets falimiteversification opportunities, whimleto a crease in the SR. There is a level of leverage beyonwhivolatility reces expectereturns. 主要是说当杠杆过高,虽然可能会带来收益,但是风险也会增加,带来更大的波动,反而会降低收益。打个比方,昨天跌了10%,今天涨了10%,看起来好像是一样的。但是实际不是一回事,反而是亏损的(亏损1%),加杠杆后会进一步降低收益。There mconstraints thprevent Manager A from scaling his active weights.So twithe absolute risk will not leto twithe return, Markowitz efficient frontier shows ththe relationship between return anrisk is concave. b为什么不对

2024-08-15 23:31 1 · 回答

NO.PZ2019012201000079 问题如下 Whiof following is correregarng on Implementation Constraints? A.Twithe absolute risk will leto twithe return. B.Markowitz efficient frontier shows ththe relationship between return anrisk is convex. C.There is a level of leverage beyonwhivolatility reces expectereturns. C is corrent. Portfolios mfaimplementation constraints thcrease the IR if active risk increases beyona specific level; Portfolios with high absolute risk targets falimiteversification opportunities, whimleto a crease in the SR. There is a level of leverage beyonwhivolatility reces expectereturns. 主要是说当杠杆过高,虽然可能会带来收益,但是风险也会增加,带来更大的波动,反而会降低收益。打个比方,昨天跌了10%,今天涨了10%,看起来好像是一样的。但是实际不是一回事,反而是亏损的(亏损1%),加杠杆后会进一步降低收益。There mconstraints thprevent Manager A from scaling his active weights.So twithe absolute risk will not leto twithe return, Markowitz efficient frontier shows ththe relationship between return anrisk is concave. 如题

2024-07-19 07:44 1 · 回答

NO.PZ2019012201000079 问题如下 Whiof following is correregarng on Implementation Constraints? A.Twithe absolute risk will leto twithe return. B.Markowitz efficient frontier shows ththe relationship between return anrisk is convex. C.There is a level of leverage beyonwhivolatility reces expectereturns. C is corrent. Portfolios mfaimplementation constraints thcrease the IR if active risk increases beyona specific level; Portfolios with high absolute risk targets falimiteversification opportunities, whimleto a crease in the SR. There is a level of leverage beyonwhivolatility reces expectereturns. 主要是说当杠杆过高,虽然可能会带来收益,但是风险也会增加,带来更大的波动,反而会降低收益。打个比方,昨天跌了10%,今天涨了10%,看起来好像是一样的。但是实际不是一回事,反而是亏损的(亏损1%),加杠杆后会进一步降低收益。There mconstraints thprevent Manager A from scaling his active weights.So twithe absolute risk will not leto twithe return, Markowitz efficient frontier shows ththe relationship between return anrisk is concave. 还是limitation of return achievebearing risk下面分的几点没有这么严格分类

2024-07-18 05:08 1 · 回答

NO.PZ2019012201000079问题如下Whiof following is correregarng on Implementation Constraints? A.Twithe absolute risk will leto twithe return.B.Markowitz efficient frontier shows ththe relationship between return anrisk is convex.C.There is a level of leverage beyonwhivolatility reces expectereturns. C is corrent. Portfolios mfaimplementation constraints thcrease the IR if active risk increases beyona specific level; Portfolios with high absolute risk targets falimiteversification opportunities, whimleto a crease in the SR. There is a level of leverage beyonwhivolatility reces expectereturns. 主要是说当杠杆过高,虽然可能会带来收益,但是风险也会增加,带来更大的波动,反而会降低收益。打个比方,昨天跌了10%,今天涨了10%,看起来好像是一样的。但是实际不是一回事,反而是亏损的(亏损1%),加杠杆后会进一步降低收益。There mconstraints thprevent Manager A from scaling his active weights.So twithe absolute risk will not leto twithe return, Markowitz efficient frontier shows ththe relationship between return anrisk is concave. 如标题 c没看懂 能在讲讲吗?

2024-06-07 12:54 1 · 回答

NO.PZ2019012201000079 问题如下 Whiof following is correregarng on Implementation Constraints? A.Twithe absolute risk will leto twithe return. B.Markowitz efficient frontier shows ththe relationship between return anrisk is convex. C.There is a level of leverage beyonwhivolatility reces expectereturns. C is corrent. Portfolios mfaimplementation constraints thcrease the IR if active risk increases beyona specific level; Portfolios with high absolute risk targets falimiteversification opportunities, whimleto a crease in the SR. There is a level of leverage beyonwhivolatility reces expectereturns. 主要是说当杠杆过高,虽然可能会带来收益,但是风险也会增加,带来更大的波动,反而会降低收益。打个比方,昨天跌了10%,今天涨了10%,看起来好像是一样的。但是实际不是一回事,反而是亏损的(亏损1%),加杠杆后会进一步降低收益。There mconstraints thprevent Manager A from scaling his active weights.So twithe absolute risk will not leto twithe return, Markowitz efficient frontier shows ththe relationship between return anrisk is concave. 马科维茨是个CONVX关系啊?

2024-03-31 22:28 2 · 回答