开发者:上海品职教育科技有限公司隐私政策详情

应用版本:4.2.11(IOS)｜3.2.5(安卓)APP下载

学习体验
App下载
手机上的品职教育

随时随地学习课程，支持音视频下载！
- 扫码下载品职教育APP
进入课程
登录 | 注册

wuzx · 2021年08月22日

最后为什么Rr方是0

NO.PZ2020010801000025

问题如下：

A model was estimated using daily data from the S&P 500 from 1977 until 2017 which included five day-of-the-week dummies (n = 10,087). The $R^2$ from this regression was 0.000599. Is there evidence that the mean varies with the day of the week?

解释：

The model estimated is

$Y_i = \beta_1D_1 + \beta_2D_2 + \beta_3D_3 + \beta_4D_4 + \beta_5D_5 + \epsilon_i$ ,

where Di is a dummy that takes the value 1 if the index of the weekday is i (e.g., Monday = 1, Tuesday = 2, c). The restriction is that

$H_0:\beta_1 = \beta_2 = \beta_3 = \beta_4 = \beta_5$

so there this is no day-of-the-week effect. This model can be equivalently written as

$Y_i = \mu + \delta_2D_2 + \delta_3D_3 + \delta_4D_4 + \delta_5D_5 + \epsilon_i$ ,

therefore, here the null is

$H_0:\delta_2 = \delta_3 = \delta_4 = \delta_5$ .

In the two models, $\mu = \beta_1$ , and $\mu + \delta_i = \beta_i$ . The second form of the model is a more standard null for an F-stat.

The F-stat of the regression is

$\frac{(R^2-0)/4}{(1-R^2)/(n-5)}=\frac{0.000599/4}{(1-0.000599)/(10087-5)}=1.51$

The distribution is an $F_{4,10082}$ and the critical value using a 5% size is 2.37. The test statistic is less than the critical value, therefore, the null that all effects are 0 is not rejected.

公示那部分带入的数字最后为什么Rr方是0

添加评论

0
0

1 个答案

品职答疑小助手雍 · 2021年08月22日

嗨，努力学习的PZer你好：

unrestricted model都已经只有0.000599了，那restricted model只会更小，这题没给的情况下也就基本忽略了。这要给的话还是要带上的，不过考试基本不会考这种计算检验的过程的，一般会直接给结果，直接拿来做比较。

----------------------------------------------
就算太阳没有迎着我们而来，我们正在朝着它而去，加油！

添加评论

0
0

1
回答
0
关注
366
浏览

我要回答关注问题

相关问题

NO.PZ2020010801000025 问题如下 A mol westimateusing ily ta from the S P 500 from 1977 until 2017 whiinclufive y-of-the-week mmies (n = 10,087). The R2R^2R2 from this regression w0.000599. Is there evinththe mevaries with the y of the week? The mol estimateis Yi=β1+β2+β3+β4+β5+ϵiY_i = \beta_11 + \beta_22 + \beta_33 + \beta_44 + \beta_55 + \epsilon_iYi=β1+β2+β3+β4+β5+ϵi, where is a mmy thtakes the value 1 if the inx of the weeky is i (e.g., Mony = 1, Tuesy = 2, c). The restriction is thH0:β1=β2=β3=β4=β5H_0:\beta_1 = \beta_2 = \beta_3 = \beta_4 = \beta_5H0:β1=β2=β3=β4=β5 so there this is no y-of-the-week effect. This mol cequivalently written Yi=μ+δ2+δ3+δ4+δ5+ϵiY_i = \mu + \lta_22 + \lta_33 + \lta_44 + \lta_55 + \epsilon_iYi=μ+δ2+δ3+δ4+δ5+ϵi, therefore, here the null is H0:δ2=δ3=δ4=δ5H_0:\lta_2 = \lta_3 = \lta_4 = \lta_5H0:δ2=δ3=δ4=δ5. In the two mols, μ=β1\mu = \beta_1μ=β1, anμ+δi=βi\mu + \lta_i = \beta_iμ+δi=βi. The seconform of the mol is a more stanrnull for F-stat. The F-stof the regression is(R2−0)/4(1−R2)/(n−5)=0.000599/4(1−0.000599)/(10087−5)=1.51\frac{(R^2-0)/4}{(1-R^2)/(n-5)}=\frac{0.000599/4}{(1-0.000599)/(10087-5)}=1.51(1−R2)/(n−5)(R2−0)/4=(1−0.000599)/(10087−5)0.000599/4=1.51The stribution is F4,10082F_{4,10082}F4,10082 anthe criticvalue using a 5% size is 2.37. The test statistic is less ththe criticvalue, therefore, the null thall effects are 0 is not rejecte 请问一下F检验分子不是应该等于(UnrestricteR 2 - RestricteR2)/q 吗。题目说了unrestricteR2但并没有说restricteR2是多少。为什么公式里面直接就把restricteR2 忽略掉了呢

2024-05-24 11:45 1 · 回答

NO.PZ2020010801000025 问题如下 A mol westimateusing ily ta from the S P 500 from 1977 until 2017 whiinclufive y-of-the-week mmies (n = 10,087). The R2R^2R2 from this regression w0.000599. Is there evinththe mevaries with the y of the week? The mol estimateis Yi=β1+β2+β3+β4+β5+ϵiY_i = \beta_11 + \beta_22 + \beta_33 + \beta_44 + \beta_55 + \epsilon_iYi=β1+β2+β3+β4+β5+ϵi, where is a mmy thtakes the value 1 if the inx of the weeky is i (e.g., Mony = 1, Tuesy = 2, c). The restriction is thH0:β1=β2=β3=β4=β5H_0:\beta_1 = \beta_2 = \beta_3 = \beta_4 = \beta_5H0:β1=β2=β3=β4=β5 so there this is no y-of-the-week effect. This mol cequivalently written Yi=μ+δ2+δ3+δ4+δ5+ϵiY_i = \mu + \lta_22 + \lta_33 + \lta_44 + \lta_55 + \epsilon_iYi=μ+δ2+δ3+δ4+δ5+ϵi, therefore, here the null is H0:δ2=δ3=δ4=δ5H_0:\lta_2 = \lta_3 = \lta_4 = \lta_5H0:δ2=δ3=δ4=δ5. In the two mols, μ=β1\mu = \beta_1μ=β1, anμ+δi=βi\mu + \lta_i = \beta_iμ+δi=βi. The seconform of the mol is a more stanrnull for F-stat. The F-stof the regression is(R2−0)/4(1−R2)/(n−5)=0.000599/4(1−0.000599)/(10087−5)=1.51\frac{(R^2-0)/4}{(1-R^2)/(n-5)}=\frac{0.000599/4}{(1-0.000599)/(10087-5)}=1.51(1−R2)/(n−5)(R2−0)/4=(1−0.000599)/(10087−5)0.000599/4=1.51The stribution is F4,10082F_{4,10082}F4,10082 anthe criticvalue using a 5% size is 2.37. The test statistic is less ththe criticvalue, therefore, the null thall effects are 0 is not rejecte 请问第二个公式是怎么推导出来的？为什么少了一个regressor

2024-05-21 15:27 3 · 回答

NO.PZ2020010801000025问题如下A mol westimateusing ily ta from the S P 500 from 1977 until 2017 whiinclufive y-of-the-week mmies (n = 10,087). The R2R^2R2 from this regression w0.000599. Is there evinththe mevaries with the y of the week?The mol estimateis Yi=β1+β2+β3+β4+β5+ϵiY_i = \beta_11 + \beta_22 + \beta_33 + \beta_44 + \beta_55 + \epsilon_iYi=β1+β2+β3+β4+β5+ϵi, where is a mmy thtakes the value 1 if the inx of the weeky is i (e.g., Mony = 1, Tuesy = 2, c). The restriction is thH0:β1=β2=β3=β4=β5H_0:\beta_1 = \beta_2 = \beta_3 = \beta_4 = \beta_5H0:β1=β2=β3=β4=β5 so there this is no y-of-the-week effect. This mol cequivalently written Yi=μ+δ2+δ3+δ4+δ5+ϵiY_i = \mu + \lta_22 + \lta_33 + \lta_44 + \lta_55 + \epsilon_iYi=μ+δ2+δ3+δ4+δ5+ϵi, therefore, here the null is H0:δ2=δ3=δ4=δ5H_0:\lta_2 = \lta_3 = \lta_4 = \lta_5H0:δ2=δ3=δ4=δ5. In the two mols, μ=β1\mu = \beta_1μ=β1, anμ+δi=βi\mu + \lta_i = \beta_iμ+δi=βi. The seconform of the mol is a more stanrnull for F-stat. The F-stof the regression is(R2−0)/4(1−R2)/(n−5)=0.000599/4(1−0.000599)/(10087−5)=1.51\frac{(R^2-0)/4}{(1-R^2)/(n-5)}=\frac{0.000599/4}{(1-0.000599)/(10087-5)}=1.51(1−R2)/(n−5)(R2−0)/4=(1−0.000599)/(10087−5)0.000599/4=1.51The stribution is F4,10082F_{4,10082}F4,10082 anthe criticvalue using a 5% size is 2.37. The test statistic is less ththe criticvalue, therefore, the null thall effects are 0 is not rejecte在unrestricte设中没有常量，有5个variables，那么在最后一问中n-ku-1为什么不是n-5-1而是n-5呢？

2023-09-05 17:44 1 · 回答

NO.PZ2020010801000025 问题如下 A mol westimateusing ily ta from the S P 500 from 1977 until 2017 whiinclufive y-of-the-week mmies (n = 10,087). The R2R^2R2 from this regression w0.000599. Is there evinththe mevaries with the y of the week? The mol estimateis Yi=β1+β2+β3+β4+β5+ϵiY_i = \beta_11 + \beta_22 + \beta_33 + \beta_44 + \beta_55 + \epsilon_iYi=β1+β2+β3+β4+β5+ϵi, where is a mmy thtakes the value 1 if the inx of the weeky is i (e.g., Mony = 1, Tuesy = 2, c). The restriction is thH0:β1=β2=β3=β4=β5H_0:\beta_1 = \beta_2 = \beta_3 = \beta_4 = \beta_5H0:β1=β2=β3=β4=β5 so there this is no y-of-the-week effect. This mol cequivalently written Yi=μ+δ2+δ3+δ4+δ5+ϵiY_i = \mu + \lta_22 + \lta_33 + \lta_44 + \lta_55 + \epsilon_iYi=μ+δ2+δ3+δ4+δ5+ϵi, therefore, here the null is H0:δ2=δ3=δ4=δ5H_0:\lta_2 = \lta_3 = \lta_4 = \lta_5H0:δ2=δ3=δ4=δ5. In the two mols, μ=β1\mu = \beta_1μ=β1, anμ+δi=βi\mu + \lta_i = \beta_iμ+δi=βi. The seconform of the mol is a more stanrnull for F-stat. The F-stof the regression is(R2−0)/4(1−R2)/(n−5)=0.000599/4(1−0.000599)/(10087−5)=1.51\frac{(R^2-0)/4}{(1-R^2)/(n-5)}=\frac{0.000599/4}{(1-0.000599)/(10087-5)}=1.51(1−R2)/(n−5)(R2−0)/4=(1−0.000599)/(10087−5)0.000599/4=1.51The stribution is F4,10082F_{4,10082}F4,10082 anthe criticvalue using a 5% size is 2.37. The test statistic is less ththe criticvalue, therefore, the null thall effects are 0 is not rejecte Means 和R Square 是个什么关系？该题目的解题思路是什么？这两者如何关联上？考了哪几个知识点？非常感谢

2023-02-05 02:23 1 · 回答

NO.PZ2020010801000025问题如下A mol westimateusing ily ta from the S P 500 from 1977 until 2017 whiinclufive y-of-the-week mmies (n = 10,087). The R2R^2R2 from this regression w0.000599. Is there evinththe mevaries with the y of the week? The mol estimateis Yi=β1+β2+β3+β4+β5+ϵiY_i = \beta_11 + \beta_22 + \beta_33 + \beta_44 + \beta_55 + \epsilon_iYi=β1+β2+β3+β4+β5+ϵi, where is a mmy thtakes the value 1 if the inx of the weeky is i (e.g., Mony = 1, Tuesy = 2, c). The restriction is thH0:β1=β2=β3=β4=β5H_0:\beta_1 = \beta_2 = \beta_3 = \beta_4 = \beta_5H0:β1=β2=β3=β4=β5 so there this is no y-of-the-week effect. This mol cequivalently written Yi=μ+δ2+δ3+δ4+δ5+ϵiY_i = \mu + \lta_22 + \lta_33 + \lta_44 + \lta_55 + \epsilon_iYi=μ+δ2+δ3+δ4+δ5+ϵi, therefore, here the null is H0:δ2=δ3=δ4=δ5H_0:\lta_2 = \lta_3 = \lta_4 = \lta_5H0:δ2=δ3=δ4=δ5. In the two mols, μ=β1\mu = \beta_1μ=β1, anμ+δi=βi\mu + \lta_i = \beta_iμ+δi=βi. The seconform of the mol is a more stanrnull for F-stat. The F-stof the regression is(R2−0)/4(1−R2)/(n−5)=0.000599/4(1−0.000599)/(10087−5)=1.51\frac{(R^2-0)/4}{(1-R^2)/(n-5)}=\frac{0.000599/4}{(1-0.000599)/(10087-5)}=1.51(1−R2)/(n−5)(R2−0)/4=(1−0.000599)/(10087−5)0.000599/4=1.51The stribution is F4,10082F_{4,10082}F4,10082 anthe criticvalue using a 5% size is 2.37. The test statistic is less ththe criticvalue, therefore, the null thall effects are 0 is not rejecte这种难度和类型的题考试会考吗

2022-03-21 15:55 1 · 回答