开发者:上海品职教育科技有限公司 隐私政策详情

应用版本:4.2.11(IOS)|3.2.5(安卓)APP下载

lixiaobai · 2021年04月26日

这句话对吗

老师,这句话对吗:

Laura Powers is a senior investment analyst at Brotley University Foundation and works for the university endowment. Powers is preparing a recommendation to allocate more funds into illiquid investments for a higher potential return and is discussing the rationale with junior analyst Jasper Heard. Heard makes the following statement to Powers:

statement: The endowment should consider low liquidity public equity investments because they are shown to be close substitutes for private equity and real estate investments in terms of liquidity premium.


--它给的答案这说的啥啊 听不懂它想表达啥

the statement is incorrect because of a misinterpretation of the effects of the illiquidity premium.

Heard’s statement on public equities is partially true, but it does not rely on a fully defensible basis for an investment recommendation. While a significant body of literature documents a positive relationship between lack of liquidity and expected returns in the case of public equity, overall it is difficult to isolate the illiquidity premium with precision and separate its effects from such other risk factors as the market, value, and size in the case of equity investments. Furthermore, estimates of the illiquidity premium are based on broad market indexes, yet an investor in these asset classes would typically invest in only a small subset of the universe with the result that individual investment experience could be very different and more susceptible to idiosyncratic factors. These challenges further emphasize the importance of liquidity budgeting in facilitating capture of the illiquidity premium while controlling for risk.

2 个答案
已采纳答案

发亮_品职助教 · 2021年04月29日

嗨,从没放弃的小努力你好:


好的,谢谢老师。还有,liquidity premium应该改名叫illiquidity premium才更贴切,对吧


嗯对

----------------------------------------------
努力的时光都是限量版,加油!

发亮_品职助教 · 2021年04月28日

嗨,爱思考的PZer你好:


主题干说了,他们想投资一些illiquid assets,这样可以赚取更多的收益。

然后这个Statement就说:他们考虑投资一点流动性较差的上市公司股票(low liquidity public equity investments),因为流动性较差的上市公司股票其实和Private equity以及Real estate差不多,因为流动性较差的上市公司股票也会有liquidity premium。

然后问这个Statement是否正确。


首先就是这个Statement说low liquidity public equity有Liquidity premium,这句是正确的,我们也经常说,流动性差的股票有流动性补偿。但是,他不构成投资投资流动性较差的上市公司股票的原因(也就是不构成用该上市公司替换Private equity以及Real estate的原因)。这是下面这句的意思:

Heard’s statement on public equities is partially true, but it does not rely on a fully defensible basis for an investment recommendation.


虽然我们说对于上市公司股票来说,流动性差和高的预期收益率存在显著的正相关(即,流动性越差,Expected return越高),但是我们很难把流动性补偿从高Expected return中剥离出来。也就说,我们投资这类股票,获得的高收益可能是因为其他因素引起的,可能不是由illiquidity引起的,或者有多少是illiquidity带来的也不知道。所以题干Statement里说投资该类股票就可以获得Liquidity premium就不够准确。这是下面这句的大概意思:


While a significant body of literature documents a positive relationship between lack of liquidity and expected returns in the case of public equity, overall it is difficult to isolate the illiquidity premium with precision and separate its effects from such other risk factors as the market, value, and size in the case of equity investments


下面这句说,在计算流动性补偿时,我们使用市场指数算的liquidity premium,但是我们投资者在实际投资时只会投资一部分股票,那用市场指数算的有流动性补偿,但投资个股是否一定有流动性补偿就不好说。那这一部分股票的表现与指数的表现就可能不同,一部分股票更容易表现出个股的特质,所以投资个股是否存在那个流动性补偿也不好说。

Furthermore, estimates of the illiquidity premium are based on broad market indexes, yet an investor in these asset classes would typically invest in only a small subset of the universe with the result that individual investment experience could be very different and more susceptible to idiosyncratic factors. 


以上大概是这道题表述的意思。这种题属于开放式的问答题,基本不会在CFA的考题里出现,CFA的考题是有明确结论的,不会是这种正反两方面讨论的题目。因此本题大概看看即可。

----------------------------------------------
加油吧,让我们一起遇见更好的自己!

lixiaobai · 2021年04月28日

好的,谢谢老师。还有,liquidity premium应该改名叫illiquidity premium才更贴切,对吧

  • 2

    回答
  • 0

    关注
  • 807

    浏览
相关问题