开发者:上海品职教育科技有限公司 隐私政策详情

应用版本:4.2.11(IOS)|3.2.5(安卓)APP下载

lman · 2021年04月23日

systematic tactical asset allocation和discretionary tactical asset allocation的定义是什么,并举例说明!

* 问题详情,请 查看题干

NO.PZ201805280100000207

问题如下:

The proposal for short- term adjustments to the KCPF asset allocation strategy is known as:

选项:

A.

de- risking.

B.

systematic tactical asset allocation.

C.

discretionary tactical asset allocation.

解释:

B is correct.

Using rules- based, quantitative signals, systematic tactical asset allocation (TAA) attempts to capture asset- class- level return anomalies that have been shown to have some predictability and persistence. Trend signals are widely used in systematic TAA. A moving- average crossover is a trend signal that indicates an upward (downward) trend when the moving average of the shorter time frame, 50 days, is above (below) the moving average of the longer time frame, 200 days.

考点:systematic TAA vs discretionary TAA

解析:正文说 “当 S&P 500的50日移动平均线在200日移动平均线之上,增加equity比重5%;当S&P 500的50日移动平均线在200日移动平均线之下,减少equity比重5%。” 这是rule-based的方法,根据trend signal短期调整资产配置以获得超额回报,因此对应的是systematic tactical asset allocation。

systematic tactical asset allocation和discretionary tactical asset allocation的定义是什么,并举例说明!

1 个答案

郭静_品职助教 · 2021年04月23日

嗨,从没放弃的小努力你好:


Discretionary TAA 是跟 predicting and timing short-term market 对应的。timing就是择时,是对asset class进行短期的偏离,抓的是时间点,是不是一个投资的好时机这个需要主观的判断,所以是定性的。

systematic TAA类似于选股,但是它跟选股又有所不同。选股选的是个股;systematic TAA选的不是个股,而是asset class。asset class当前是被高估还是低估,需要动手算一下,比大小的,所以是定量的。

----------------------------------------------
虽然现在很辛苦,但努力过的感觉真的很好,加油!

Yuyu · 2021年06月16日

但是择时也可以量化呀,量化择时策略不都是量化的?这里有点没想通。

  • 1

    回答
  • 2

    关注
  • 943

    浏览
相关问题

NO.PZ201805280100000207 问题如下 The proposfor short- term austments to the KCPF asset allocation strategy is known as: A.- risking. B.systematic tacticasset allocation. C.scretionary tacticasset allocation. B is correct. Using rules- base quantitative signals, systematic tacticasset allocation (TAattempts to capture asset- class- level return anomalies thhave been shown to have some prectability anpersistence. Trensignals are wily usein systematic TAA moving- average crossover is a trensignthincates upwar(wnwar trenwhen the moving average of the shorter time frame, 50 ys, is above (below) the moving average of the longer time frame, 200 ys.考点systematic Tvs scretionary TAA解析正文说 “当 S P 500的50日移动平均线在200日移动平均线之上,增加equity比重5%;当S P 500的50日移动平均线在200日移动平均线之下,减少equity比重5%。” 这是rule-base方法,根据trensignal短期调整资产配置以获得超额回报,因此对应的是systematic tacticasset allocation。 -risking是什么

2024-06-19 19:21 1 · 回答

NO.PZ201805280100000207问题如下The proposfor short- term austments to the KCPF asset allocation strategy is known as:A.- risking.B.systematic tacticasset allocation.C.scretionary tacticasset allocation. B is correct. Using rules- base quantitative signals, systematic tacticasset allocation (TAattempts to capture asset- class- level return anomalies thhave been shown to have some prectability anpersistence. Trensignals are wily usein systematic TAA moving- average crossover is a trensignthincates upwar(wnwar trenwhen the moving average of the shorter time frame, 50 ys, is above (below) the moving average of the longer time frame, 200 ys.考点systematic Tvs scretionary TAA解析正文说 “当 S P 500的50日移动平均线在200日移动平均线之上,增加equity比重5%;当S P 500的50日移动平均线在200日移动平均线之下,减少equity比重5%。” 这是rule-base方法,根据trensignal短期调整资产配置以获得超额回报,因此对应的是systematic tacticasset allocation。 A在讲义中 有对应的内容吗

2023-06-28 20:48 1 · 回答

NO.PZ201805280100000207 答案中给出的rule-base然是通过经验法则得出的,难道不是人凭主观经验得出的法则么?是否和systematic TAA中的quantative相矛盾呢?

2021-10-29 13:11 1 · 回答

我是不同意答案的 文中没有任何迹象表明低于200天的MA就要增加5%的头寸是根据量化数据得来的 更多的是一种经验法则

2019-10-27 21:26 1 · 回答