开发者:上海品职教育科技有限公司 隐私政策详情

应用版本:4.2.11(IOS)｜3.2.5(安卓)APP下载

返回

HG · 2021年03月18日

investment capacity

  1. CFA III
  2. Equity

NO.PZ2019012201000039

问题如下：

Matt makes the following statements about investing with long-only managers:

Statement 1 A long-only portfolio puts a firm floor on how much an investor can win.

Statement 2 A long-only portfolio generally allows for greater investment capacity than other approaches, particularly when using strategies that focus on large-cap stocks.

Which of Matt’s statements regarding investing with long-only managers is correct?

选项：

A.

Only Statement 1

B.

Only Statement 2

C.

Both Statement 1 and Statement 2

解释：

B is correct.

考点：Long/Short, Long Extension, And Market-neutral

解析：表述1错在投资者不是为收益设定底线，而是为损失设定了底线。因为股票价格可以跌到的最低水平为零，而上涨空间是无限的，因此，只做多的投资者最大可能损失的金额就等于股票的初始投资。

这个地方的investment capacity不是说盘子太小买不到的意思吗？而是再说能不能不设manager投资限制的能力吗？

添加评论
1 个答案

maggie_品职助教 · 2021年03月19日

嗨，努力学习的PZer你好：


investment capacity指的是你能够实现你投资判断的能力。

 A long-only portfolio generally allows for greater investment capacity than other approaches, particularly when using strategies that focus on large-cap stocks.这句话说的是long only的组合通常比其他交易策略的investment capacity要大，特别是当只做多大盘股的时候。

1.先解释前半句：因为short position的限制会更多（很多股票不允许卖空），相比只做多，long-short碰到不能做交易的概率会更大。因此，long only的investment capacity更大。

2.再解释后半句：相比小盘股，大盘股交易量大、流动性好，如果看涨，long only（只做多）大盘股的股票是不会收到任何限制的。而long only小盘股，你认为某只股票被低估，想买入，有可能买不到。

----------------------------------------------
加油吧，让我们一起遇见更好的自己！

  • 1

    回答

  • 2

    关注

  • 1032

    浏览
相关问题

NO.PZ2019012201000039 问题如下 Matt makes the following statements about investing with long-only managers: Statement 1 A long-only portfolio puts a firm floor on how muinvestor cwin. Statement 2 A long-only portfolio generally allows for greater investment capacity thother approaches, particularly when using strategies thfocus on large-cstocks. Whiof Matt’s statements regarng investing with long-only managers is correct? Only Statement 1 Only Statement 2 Both Statement 1 anStatement 2 B is correct. 考点：Long/Short, Long Extension, AnMarket-neutral 解析：表述1错在投资者不是为收益设定底线，而是为损失设定了底线。因为股票价格可以跌到的最低水平为零，而上涨空间是无限的，因此，只做多的投资者最大可能损失的金额就等于股票的初始投资。 请问这道题Statement 2 讲的是什么啊？ 为什么正确？

2024-04-05 07:50 1 · 回答

NO.PZ2019012201000039 问题如下 Matt makes the following statements about investing with long-only managers: Statement 1 A long-only portfolio puts a firm floor on how muinvestor cwin. Statement 2 A long-only portfolio generally allows for greater investment capacity thother approaches, particularly when using strategies thfocus on large-cstocks. Whiof Matt’s statements regarng investing with long-only managers is correct? Only Statement 1 Only Statement 2 Both Statement 1 anStatement 2 B is correct. 考点：Long/Short, Long Extension, AnMarket-neutral 解析：表述1错在投资者不是为收益设定底线，而是为损失设定了底线。因为股票价格可以跌到的最低水平为零，而上涨空间是无限的，因此，只做多的投资者最大可能损失的金额就等于股票的初始投资。 A long-only portfolio generally allows for greater investment capacity thother approaches, particularly when using strategies thfocus on large-cstocks.

2024-01-10 16:59 1 · 回答

NO.PZ2019012201000039 问题如下 Matt makes the following statements about investing with long-only managers: Statement 1 A long-only portfolio puts a firm floor on how muinvestor cwin. Statement 2 A long-only portfolio generally allows for greater investment capacity thother approaches, particularly when using strategies thfocus on large-cstocks. Whiof Matt’s statements regarng investing with long-only managers is correct? Only Statement 1 Only Statement 2 Both Statement 1 anStatement 2 B is correct. 考点：Long/Short, Long Extension, AnMarket-neutral 解析：表述1错在投资者不是为收益设定底线，而是为损失设定了底线。因为股票价格可以跌到的最低水平为零，而上涨空间是无限的，因此，只做多的投资者最大可能损失的金额就等于股票的初始投资。 statement 2应该是long-short吧？

2023-08-26 17:12 1 · 回答

NO.PZ2019012201000039问题如下 Matt makes the following statements about investing with long-only managers: Statement 1 A long-only portfolio puts a firm floor on how muinvestor cwin. Statement 2 A long-only portfolio generally allows for greater investment capacity thother approaches, particularly when using strategies thfocus on large-cstocks. Whiof Matt’s statements regarng investing with long-only managers is correct? Only Statement 1 Only Statement 2 Both Statement 1 anStatement 2 B is correct. 考点：Long/Short, Long Extension, AnMarket-neutral 解析：表述1错在投资者不是为收益设定底线，而是为损失设定了底线。因为股票价格可以跌到的最低水平为零，而上涨空间是无限的，因此，只做多的投资者最大可能损失的金额就等于股票的初始投资。 能中文翻译下两个题干么

2023-07-22 13:16 1 · 回答

NO.PZ2019012201000039 问题如下 Matt makes the following statements about investing with long-only managers: Statement 1 A long-only portfolio puts a firm floor on how muinvestor cwin. Statement 2 A long-only portfolio generally allows for greater investment capacity thother approaches, particularly when using strategies thfocus on large-cstocks. Whiof Matt’s statements regarng investing with long-only managers is correct? Only Statement 1 Only Statement 2 Both Statement 1 anStatement 2 B is correct. 考点：Long/Short, Long Extension, AnMarket-neutral 解析：表述1错在投资者不是为收益设定底线，而是为损失设定了底线。因为股票价格可以跌到的最低水平为零，而上涨空间是无限的，因此，只做多的投资者最大可能损失的金额就等于股票的初始投资。 A long-only portfolio puts a firm floor on how muinvestor cwin.这话本身应该没错吧, 我long only最大收益无限, 最小收益为0, 不就是为win设定了floor吗? floor=0不是吗?

2023-02-17 22:58 1 · 回答