开发者:上海品职教育科技有限公司 隐私政策详情

应用版本:4.2.11(IOS)|3.2.5(安卓)APP下载

Tan · 2020年11月04日

问一道题:NO.PZ2018062009000031

问题如下:

Cliff was invited to give a speech at an important financial conference, the host of the event is an investment manager who recently carrys on business with Cliff's firm. To show high respect for the speakers, the host firm provided Cliff with free conference registration for his wife and arranged for fancy seafood dinner at the local lavish restaurant after the conference. Which of the following statements is the most appropriate?

选项:

A.

Cliff can not accept the invitation because the free conference registration for his wife and the seafood dinner will violate Standard I(B).

B.

Cliff can not accept the invitation because the seafood dinner will violate Standard I(B).

C.

Cliff can accept the invitation thoroughly.

解释:

A is correct.

Based on Standard I(B) Independence and Objectivity, members and candidates must maintain their independence and objectivity. The free conference registration for Cliff's wife and the fancy seafood dinner do not have direct relation with the speaking engagement, and can be regarded as inducements that affect his independence and objectivity. If Cliff accepts the invitation, he will violate Standard I(B).

没看懂这题,主办方邀请cliff去演讲,顺便邀请了他的妻子参加,有啥错误?请吃很贵的饭肯定是违反独立客观性,但没懂他老婆参加有听讲会有什么关系?

1 个答案
已采纳答案

Debrah_品职答疑助手 · 2020年11月04日

嗨,爱思考的PZer你好:


主办方给了他妻子免费的参会,他妻子是没必要参加的,因为他妻子与这次的会议活动没关,主办方邀请的是他本人发表演讲,所以给他妻子的免费参会算作“gift”。

另外,题干中说fancy seafood dinner at the local lavish restaurant ,普通的接待完全没问题,但是这道题是Lavish的接待了,还接待了他妻子。站在第三方的角度看,这可能会产生利益冲突,所以不能接受。


-------------------------------
就算太阳没有迎着我们而来,我们正在朝着它而去,加油!