开发者:上海品职教育科技有限公司 隐私政策详情

应用版本:4.2.11(IOS)|3.2.5(安卓)APP下载

SUN · 2020年05月30日

问一道题:NO.PZ201809170400000602 [ CFA III ]

* 问题详情,请 查看题干

问题如下:

Ayanna Chen is a portfolio manager at Aycrig Fund, where she supervises assistant portfolio manager Mordechai Garcia. Aycrig Fund invests money for high-net-worth and institutional investors. Chen asks Garcia to analyze certain information relating to Aycrig Fund’s three submanagers, Managers A, B, and C.

Manager A has $250 million in assets under management (AUM), an active risk of 5%, an information coefficient of 0.15, and a transfer coefficient of 0.40. Manager A’s portfolio has a 2.5% expected active return this year.

Chen directs Garcia to determine the maximum position size that Manager A can hold in shares of Pasliant Corporation, which has a market capitalization of $3.0 billion, an index weight of 0.20%, and an average daily trading volume (ADV) of 1% of its market capitalization.

Manager A has the following position size policy constraints:

Allocation: No investment in any security may represent more than 3% of total AUM.

Liquidity: No position size may represent more than 10% of the dollar value of the security’s ADV.

Index weight: The maximum position weight must be less than or equal to 10 times the security’s weight in the index.

Manager B holds a highly diversified portfolio that has balanced exposures to rewarded risk factors, high active share, and a relatively low active risk target.

Selected data on Manager C’s portfolio, which contains three assets, is presented in Exhibit 1.

Chen considers adding a fourth sub-manager and evaluates three managers’ portfolios, Portfolios X, Y, and Z. The managers for Portfolios X, Y, and Z all have similar costs, fees, and alpha skills, and their factor exposures align with both Aycrig’s and investors’ expectations and constraints. The portfolio factor exposures, risk contributions, and risk characteristics are presented in Exhibits 2 and 3.

Chen and Garcia next discuss characteristics of long–short and long-only investing. Garcia makes the following statements about investing with long–short and long-only managers:

Statement 1 A long–short portfolio allows for a gross exposure of 100%.

Statement 2 A long-only portfolio generally allows for greater investment capacity than other approaches, particularly when using strategies that focus on large-cap stocks.

Chen and Garcia then turn their attention to portfolio management approaches. Chen prefers an approach that emphasizes security-specific factors, does not engage in factor timing, and runs a concentrated portfolio .


Which of the following position size policy constraints is the most restrictive in setting Manager A’s maximum position size in shares of Pasliant Corporation?

选项:

A.

Liquidity

B.

Allocation

C.

Index weight

解释:

A is correct. The maximum position size in shares of Pasliant Corporation (PC) is determined by the constraint with the lowest dollar amount. The maximum position size for PC under each constraint is calculated as follows:

Liquidity Constraint

Dollar value of PC traded daily = PC market cap × Average daily trading volume

Dollar value of PC traded daily = $3 billion × 1.0% = $30 million

Liquidity constraint = Dollar value of PC traded daily × Liquidity % threshold

Liquidity constraint = $30 million × 10% = $3 million

Allocation Constraint

Allocation constraint = AUM × Maximum position size threshold

Allocation constraint = $250 million × 3.0% = $7.5 million

Index Weight Constraint

Index weight constraint = AUM × (Index weight × 10)

Index weight constraint = $250 million × (0.20% × 10) = $5.0 million

The liquidity constraint of $3.0 million is less than both the $5.0 million index weight constraint and the $7.5 million allocation constraint. Therefore, the maximum allowable position size that Manager A may take in PC is $3.0 million.

weight的限制里面,security weight in the index. 为啥不是用指数,而是用组合的AUM
1 个答案
已采纳答案

maggie_品职助教 · 2020年05月31日

嗨,努力学习的PZer你好:


我们现在要计算的是基金经理A能够买多少这只公司(最大持仓限制),肯定乘以的是基金A有多少钱,AUM即资产管理的规模。这和指数的市值没关系。


-------------------------------
加油吧,让我们一起遇见更好的自己!


  • 1

    回答
  • 0

    关注
  • 2934

    浏览
相关问题

NO.PZ201809170400000602问题如下 Whiof the following position size policonstraints is the most restrictive in setting Manager A’s maximum position size in shares of Pasliant Corporation? A.LiquityB.AllocationC.Inx weight A is correct. The maximum position size in shares of Pasliant Corporation (Pis terminethe constraint with the lowest llamount. The maximum position size for PC unr eaconstraint is calculatefollows:Liquity Constraintllvalue of PC traily = PC market c× Average ily trang volumellvalue of PC traily = $3 billion × 1.0% = $30 millionLiquity constraint = llvalue of PC traily × Liquity % thresholiquity constraint = $30 million × 10% = $3 millionAllocation ConstraintAllocation constraint = AUM × Maximum position size thresholllocation constraint = $250 million × 3.0% = $7.5 millionInx Weight ConstraintInx weight constraint = AUM × (Inx weight × 10)Inx weight constraint = $250 million × (0.20% × 10) = $5.0 millionThe liquity constraint of $3.0 million is less thboth the $5.0 million inx weight constraint anthe $7.5 million allocation constraint. Therefore, the maximum allowable position size thManager A mtake in PC is $3.0 million. 根据题目的描述,inx weight不是应该乘以市值吗?为什么题目是乘以在管规模呢

2023-07-11 15:06 1 · 回答

NO.PZ201809170400000602 问题如下 Whiof the following position size policonstraints is the most restrictive in setting Manager A’s maximum position size in shares of Pasliant Corporation? A.Liquity B.Allocation C.Inx weight A is correct. The maximum position size in shares of Pasliant Corporation (Pis terminethe constraint with the lowest llamount. The maximum position size for PC unr eaconstraint is calculatefollows:Liquity Constraintllvalue of PC traily = PC market c× Average ily trang volumellvalue of PC traily = $3 billion × 1.0% = $30 millionLiquity constraint = llvalue of PC traily × Liquity % thresholiquity constraint = $30 million × 10% = $3 millionAllocation ConstraintAllocation constraint = AUM × Maximum position size thresholllocation constraint = $250 million × 3.0% = $7.5 millionInx Weight ConstraintInx weight constraint = AUM × (Inx weight × 10)Inx weight constraint = $250 million × (0.20% × 10) = $5.0 millionThe liquity constraint of $3.0 million is less thboth the $5.0 million inx weight constraint anthe $7.5 million allocation constraint. Therefore, the maximum allowable position size thManager A mtake in PC is $3.0 million. Inx weightA基金中投资的任和一只股票的权重不能超过该股票在指数中权重的10倍。权重限制 = $250 million × (0.20% × 10) = $5.0 million怎么区分,有时候inx weight是用AUM 去乘,有时候是用maket cap去乘除,如何区分呢?

2023-05-06 21:47 1 · 回答

NO.PZ201809170400000602 问题如下 Whiof the following position size policonstraints is the most restrictive in setting Manager A’s maximum position size in shares of Pasliant Corporation? A.Liquity B.Allocation C.Inx weight A is correct. The maximum position size in shares of Pasliant Corporation (Pis terminethe constraint with the lowest llamount. The maximum position size for PC unr eaconstraint is calculatefollows:Liquity Constraintllvalue of PC traily = PC market c× Average ily trang volumellvalue of PC traily = $3 billion × 1.0% = $30 millionLiquity constraint = llvalue of PC traily × Liquity % thresholiquity constraint = $30 million × 10% = $3 millionAllocation ConstraintAllocation constraint = AUM × Maximum position size thresholllocation constraint = $250 million × 3.0% = $7.5 millionInx Weight ConstraintInx weight constraint = AUM × (Inx weight × 10)Inx weight constraint = $250 million × (0.20% × 10) = $5.0 millionThe liquity constraint of $3.0 million is less thboth the $5.0 million inx weight constraint anthe $7.5 million allocation constraint. Therefore, the maximum allowable position size thManager A mtake in PC is $3.0 million. 老师请问,为何是选三者中最小的呢?题目问的是“the most restrictive in setting Manager A’s maximum position size in shares of Pasliant Corporation”?所以是最小范围就是最严格?maximum position size这三个单词可以忽略,是吧?

2022-12-23 22:56 1 · 回答

NO.PZ201809170400000602 问题如下 Whiof the following position size policonstraints is the most restrictive in setting Manager A’s maximum position size in shares of Pasliant Corporation? A.Liquity B.Allocation C.Inx weight A is correct. The maximum position size in shares of Pasliant Corporation (Pis terminethe constraint with the lowest llamount. The maximum position size for PC unr eaconstraint is calculatefollows:Liquity Constraintllvalue of PC traily = PC market c× Average ily trang volumellvalue of PC traily = $3 billion × 1.0% = $30 millionLiquity constraint = llvalue of PC traily × Liquity % thresholiquity constraint = $30 million × 10% = $3 millionAllocation ConstraintAllocation constraint = AUM × Maximum position size thresholllocation constraint = $250 million × 3.0% = $7.5 millionInx Weight ConstraintInx weight constraint = AUM × (Inx weight × 10)Inx weight constraint = $250 million × (0.20% × 10) = $5.0 millionThe liquity constraint of $3.0 million is less thboth the $5.0 million inx weight constraint anthe $7.5 million allocation constraint. Therefore, the maximum allowable position size thManager A mtake in PC is $3.0 million. : The maximum position weight must less thor equto 10 times the security’s weight in the inx.这里的意思为什么不是说限制投的钱在这个3billion里的比重,而是限制我们自己aum里的比重。

2022-05-21 16:01 3 · 回答

NO.PZ201809170400000602 老师,这道题。我没看到题目在问什么,也不知道这个过程什么意思,可以麻烦老师一下吗

2021-09-23 21:39 1 · 回答