开发者:上海品职教育科技有限公司 隐私政策详情

应用版本:4.2.11(IOS)｜3.2.5(安卓)APP下载

返回

我们 · 2020年04月28日

问一道题：NO.PZ2016082406000085

  1. FRM II
  2. Credit Risk Measurement And Management

问题如下：

You are the credit risk manager for Bank Happy. Bank Happy holds Treasuries for USD 500 million: one large loan that has a positive probability of default for USD 400 million and another loan that has a positive probability of default for USD 100 million. The defaults are uncorrelated. The bank computes a credit VAR at 1% using CreditRisk+. Which of the following statements made about the VAR by the analyst who works for you is necessarily wrong?

选项：

A.

The VAR or WCL can be equal to zero.

B.

The expected loss on the portfolio exceeds the VAR.

C.

The expected loss on the portfolio is necessarily smaller than the VAR.

D.

None of the above statements is wrong.

解释：

ANSWER: C

The credit VAR could be zero. For instance, assume that the PD is 0.003. The joint probability of no default is then (1−0.003)(1−0.003)=99.4%{(1-0.003)}{(1-0.003)}=99.4\%. Because this is greater than the 99% confidence level, the worst loss is zero. The expected loss, however, would be 0.3% assuming zero recovery, which is greater than VAR.

没有看懂这个题目的解释，麻烦能再解释一下吗？


添加评论
2 个答案

品职答疑小助手雍 · 2020年04月28日

对啊，99%的var定义对应的是第一个累计概率超过99%的损失值，这题里第一个超过99%的累计概率是99.4%，对应的损失是0，那么wcl就是0.

品职答疑小助手雍 · 2020年04月28日

嗨，爱思考的PZer你好：


本题答案解析其实是举了一个极端的例子来说明各选项的。当违约概率非常低，比如解析中所给的0.3%时，两笔贷款d都不违约的概率是99.4%，而WCL的定义是 P(LOSS<= ?) = 99%.  所以根据定义，WCL就取0。所以A是可以成立的。

而 EL 就是总金额*违约概率*LGD，本题中，假设PD等于0.3%时，那就是0.003*500million 。此时EL就超过了CVAR了。B在这个极端的情况下也是成立的。


-------------------------------
加油吧，让我们一起遇见更好的自己！


我们 · 2020年04月28日

是因为两笔贷款都不违约的概率为99.4%，然后99.4%在99%左边（大于99%），所以WCL=0?

  • 2

    回答

  • 0

    关注

  • 438

    浏览
相关问题

NO.PZ2016082406000085 The expecteloss on the portfolio excee the VAR. The expecteloss on the portfolio is necessarily smaller ththe VAR. None of the above statements is wrong. ANSWER: C The cret Vcoulzero. For instance, assume ththe Pis 0.003. The joint probability of no fault is then (1−0.003)(1−0.003)=99.4%{(1-0.003)}{(1-0.003)}=99.4\%(1−0.003)(1−0.003)=99.4%. Because this is greater ththe 99% confinlevel, the worst loss is zero. The expecteloss, however, woul0.3% assuming zero recovery, whiis greater thVAR.请问为什么这里大于99%，WCL就等于0呢

2021-03-30 17:28 1 · 回答

NO.PZ2016082406000085 You are the cret risk manager for Bank Happy. Bank Happy hol Treasuries for US500 million: one large lothha positive probability of fault for US400 million ananother lothha positive probability of fault for US100 million. The faults are uncorrelate The bank computes a cret V1% using CretRisk+. Whiof the following statements ma about the Vthe analyst who works for you is necessarily wrong? The Vor Wcequto zero. The expecteloss on the portfolio excee the VAR. The expecteloss on the portfolio is necessarily smaller ththe VAR. None of the above statements is wrong. ANSWER: C The cret Vcoulzero. For instance, assume ththe Pis 0.003. The joint probability of no fault is then (1−0.003)(1−0.003)=99.4%{(1-0.003)}{(1-0.003)}=99.4\%(1−0.003)(1−0.003)=99.4%. Because this is greater ththe 99% confinlevel, the worst loss is zero. The expecteloss, however, woul0.3% assuming zero recovery, whiis greater thVAR. 如果说违约概率特别低，WCL又是零，那么Var=WCL-EL岂不是为负数了？

2021-03-16 10:39 1 · 回答

You are the cret risk manager for Bank Happy. Bank Happy hol Treasuries for US500 million: one large lothha positive probability of fault for US400 million ananother lothha positive probability of fault for US100 million. The faults are uncorrelate The bank computes a cret V1% using CretRisk+. Whiof the following statements ma about the Vthe analyst who works for you is necessarily wrong? The Vor Wcequto zero. The expecteloss on the portfolio excee the VAR. The expecteloss on the portfolio is necessarily smaller ththe VAR. None of the above statements is wrong. ANSWER: C The cret Vcoulzero. For instance, assume ththe Pis 0.003. The joint probability of no fault is then (1−0.003)(1−0.003)=99.4%{(1-0.003)}{(1-0.003)}=99.4\%(1−0.003)(1−0.003)=99.4%. Because this is greater ththe 99% confinlevel, the worst loss is zero. The expecteloss, however, woul0.3% assuming zero recovery, whiis greater thVAR. 请教下老师，这道题可以从正态分布的var满足资可加性这条性质解答吗？

2020-02-29 21:33 1 · 回答

You are the cret risk manager for Bank Happy. Bank Happy hol Treasuries for US500 million: one large lothha positive probability of fault for US400 million ananother lothha positive probability of fault for US100 million. The faults are uncorrelate The bank computes a cret V1% using CretRisk+. Whiof the following statements ma about the Vthe analyst who works for you is necessarily wrong? The Vor Wcequto zero. The expecteloss on the portfolio excee the VAR. The expecteloss on the portfolio is necessarily smaller ththe VAR. None of the above statements is wrong. ANSWER: C The cret Vcoulzero. For instance, assume ththe Pis 0.003. The joint probability of no fault is then (1−0.003)(1−0.003)=99.4%{(1-0.003)}{(1-0.003)}=99.4\%(1−0.003)(1−0.003)=99.4%. Because this is greater ththe 99% confinlevel, the worst loss is zero. The expecteloss, however, woul0.3% assuming zero recovery, whiis greater thVAR. BC两个怎么理解呢？UL=VaR=WCL-EL 怎么只从EL就能判断呢？

2020-02-20 10:24 1 · 回答