开发者:上海品职教育科技有限公司 隐私政策详情

应用版本:4.2.11(IOS)|3.2.5(安卓)APP下载

Spencer · 2020年03月11日

问一道题:NO.PZ2015121810000059

问题如下:

To best assess an ETF’s performance, which reflects the impact of portfolio rebalancing expenses and other fees, an investor should:

选项:

A.

review daily return differences between the ETF and its benchmark.

B.

perform a rolling return assessment between the ETF and its benchmark

C.

compare the ETF’s annual expense ratio with that of other ETFs in its asset class category.

解释:

B is correct. A rolling return assessment, referred to in the ETF industry as the “tracking difference,” provides a more informative picture of the investment outcome for an investor in an ETF. Such an analysis allows investors to see the cumulative effect of portfolio management and expenses over an extended period. It also allows for comparison with other annual metrics such as a fund’s expense ratio. Tracking error, as a statistic, reveals only ETF tracking variability; it does not reveal to investors whether the fund is over- or underperforming its index or whether that tracking error is concentrated over a few days or is more consistently experienced. An ETF’s expense ratio does not fully reflect the investor experience. That is, the expense ratio does not reflect the cost of portfolio rebalancing or other fees, making it an inferior assessment measure relative to a rolling return assessment.

老师可以解析一下Rolling Return吗

1 个答案
已采纳答案

丹丹_品职答疑助手 · 2020年03月13日

同学你好,rolling return其实本质上就是将一段期间的收益累计起来,比如从2019年1月-2020年1月计算一个return,再从2019年2月-2020年2月计算一个 return。。。。一次类推算出来的就是rolling return

但在ETF这里面,其实我们强调的是rolling difference,让每个周期内的rolling return和benchmark 比较,其差额与管理费费率比较,看看rerurn 和benchmark的差别,是不是由于管理费造成的。

因为rolling difference是%形式的,想比较于我们之前学习的tracking error,这种方差形式的差别更有代表性。因为方差只能代表偏离水平。

希望可以帮到你