开发者:上海品职教育科技有限公司 隐私政策详情

应用版本:4.2.11(IOS)|3.2.5(安卓)APP下载

Aaabby · 2020年01月15日

问一道题:NO.PZ2019103001000053

问题如下:

Abram and Edgarton recently attended an investment committee meeting where interest rate expectations for the next 12 months were discussed. The Fund’s mandate allows its duration to fluctuate ±0.30 per year from the benchmark duration. The Fund’s duration is currently equal to its benchmark. Although the Fund is presently invested entirely in annual coupon
sovereign bonds, its investment policy also allows investments in mortgage-backed securities (MBS) and call options on government bond futures. The Fund’s current holdings of on-the-run bonds are presented in Exhibit 1

Over the next 12 months, Abram expects a stable yield curve; however, Edgarton expects a steepening yield curve, with short-term yields rising by 1.00% and long-term yields rising by more than 1.00%.

Based on her yield curve forecast, Abram recommends to her supervisor changes to the Fund’s holdings using the following three strategies:

Strategy 1: Sell the 3-year bonds, and use the proceeds to buy 10-year bonds.

Strategy 2: Sell the 5-year bonds, and use the proceeds to buy 30-year MBS with an effective duration of 4.75.

Strategy 3: Sell the 10-year bonds, and buy call options on 10-year government bond futures.

Based on Exhibit 1 and Abram’s interest rate expectations, which of the following strategies is expected to perform best over the next 12 months?

选项:

A.

Strategy 1

B.

Strategy 2

C.

Strategy 3

解释:

B is correct.

In a stable yield curve environment, holding bonds with higher convexity negatively affects portfolio performance. These bonds have lower yields than bonds with lower convexity, all else being equal. The 5-year US Treasury has higher convexity than the negative convexity 30-year MBS bond. So, by selling the 5-year Treasury and purchasing the 30-year MBS, Abram will reduce the portfolio’s convexity and enhance its yield without violating the duration mandate versus the benchmark.

老师:请问 B选项和C选项的区别是什么呢?

2 个答案

发亮_品职助教 · 2020年03月06日

“5-year bonds的Convexity,就理解成一个Bullet?或者是一个Convexity很小的债券?所以buy 30-year MBS可以极大地降低Convexity?是这个逻辑么?”


5-year bond就是普通债券,Convexity为正数;MBS的Convexity为负(Negative convexity),所以卖普通债券、买MBS,就会降低Convexity。

发亮_品职助教 · 2020年01月15日

嗨,爱思考的PZer你好:


Strategy 2: Sell the 5-year bonds, and use the proceeds to buy 30-year MBS with an effective duration of 4.75.


 

Strategy 2是Sell convexity策略。

题目说基于Abram同学的利率预期,找一个合适的策略。

然后Abram同学的利率预期是Stable yield curve:Abram expects a stable yield curve,和这道题选项能对上的策略,就是在Stable yield curve下卖出Convexity策略。

因为在收益率曲线变动时,Convexity大的债券能享受涨多跌少的好处;但如果收益率曲线稳定Stable,那Convexity就没有用处了,此时,Convexity大对我们的组合没有意义,所以我们可以选择卖出Convexity来赚点收益。因为大的Convexity,是我们付出成本“购买”到的。

Strategy 2,就是先卖出组合里的5年期债券,然后买入Duration=4.75的30年期MBS,从表格中知道,卖出的5年期债券Duration=4.74,买入的MBS的Duration=4.75,所以这一买一卖对组合的Duration没有影响。

但是因为MBS具有Negative convexity的属性,所以卖出具有正Convexity的5年期债券,买入具有负Convexity的MBS,我们就降低了组合的Convexity数据。这样就执行了Sell convexity的策略。

卖出Convexity可以获得收益,体现在MBS更高的收益率里。这样在Stable yield curve下,就通过Sell convexity提升了组合的收益。




Strategy 3: Sell the 10-year bonds, and buy call options on 10-year government bond futures.

这是一个买入Option的策略。所以是Buy convexity的策略。

他也是先卖出10年期债券,然后买入一个Option,目的是买卖前后让组合的Duration不变。但是买入Option的Convexity远远大于原来债券的Convexity,所以这就增加了组合的Convexity数据。

因为Convexity有涨多跌少的优势,所以我们如果预测收益率曲线大,通过Buy convexity可以实现这种涨多跌少的好处。

Strategy 3不适合本题的利率预期,所以排除掉。




总结下:

预期收益率曲线Stable时,我们需要Sell convexity,方法有:

1、Sell option(卖出Call/Put都行),因为Option具有正的Convexity,卖出Option就是卖出Convexity

2、买入MBS/Callable bond,因为他俩具有负的Convexity,卖出组合的普通债券,买入MBS或者Callable bond,就能使得组合的Convexity变小,实现Sell convexity。

3、将Barbell调成Bullet,因为相同Duration下Bullet的Convexity更小。

 

预期收益率曲线波动巨大时,我们要Buy convexity,方法有:

1、Buy option(买入Call/Put都行)

2、Bullet调整成Barbell,因为相同Duration下Barbell的Convexity更大。


-------------------------------
加油吧,让我们一起遇见更好的自己!


JustJuve · 2020年03月05日

5-year bonds的Convexity,就理解成一个Bullet?或者是一个Convexity很小的债券?所以buy 30-year MBS可以极大地降低Convexity?是这个逻辑么?

  • 2

    回答
  • 6

    关注
  • 744

    浏览
相关问题

NO.PZ2019103001000053 Abrwill rethe portfolio’s convexity anenhanits yielwithout violating the ration mante versus the benchmark.解析中这句话最后一句说的没有violate the ration mante怎么理解呢?

2021-10-05 18:40 2 · 回答

NO.PZ2019103001000053 Strategy 2 Strategy 3 B is correct. In a stable yielcurve environment, holng bon with higher convexity negatively affects portfolio performance. These bon have lower yiel thbon with lower convexity, all else being equal. The 5-yeUS Treasury hhigher convexity ththe negative convexity 30-yeMbon So, selling the 5-yeTreasury anpurchasing the 30-yeMBS, Abrwill rethe portfolio’s convexity anenhanits yielwithout violating the ration mante versus the benchmark. 卖3.0205份3年 买1份10年。他们不就ration netural了吗

2021-06-20 13:44 1 · 回答

NO.PZ2019103001000053 本题如果抛开题目对于ration 变化范围的限制,是不是应该ring the yielcurve 策略是收益最高的,我记得之前学ring the yielcurve时那道题是这么的

2021-05-15 11:44 1 · 回答

NO.PZ2019103001000053 请问老师,有两个问题,请老师帮助看一下理解是否正确 问题一与2相比,不选1的原因是不是(1)不满足ration mat,(2)没有在yielcurve stable的前提下sell convexity进一步增加收益? 问题二1增加的收益是不是等于10年期的YTM-3年期的YTM=2.34-1.4?同理,2增加的收益=2.95-1.8+sell convexity增加的收益率。

2021-03-28 18:04 1 · 回答

请问,1、strategy1卖短期债同时买长期债,是会增加convexity的,对吗?因为长期债期间现金流多于短期债,所以期限长的债券convexity更大。2、为什么说strategy1的本质是ring the yielcurve呢?(其他人提问的答案中这么说的)。strategy1并不是买入长期债持有一段时间后再卖掉,而是同时买卖不同期限债券,债券不同的;ring the yielcurve要求买入和卖出的应该是同一个债券吧。

2021-02-04 12:31 1 · 回答