今天也要来一杯 · 2019年12月27日
* 问题详情，请 查看题干
问题如下：
Whose statement regarding the technical analysis department is most accurate?
选项：
A.Carter.
B.Suzuki.
C.Rodriguez.
解释：
C is correct.
Momentum can be partly explained by short-term under-reaction to relevant information, and longer term over-reaction and thus supports Rodriguez’s view that the technical analysis department has value.
为什么不选A呢
NO.PZ201511190100000508 问题如下 Whose statement regarng the technicanalysis partment is most accurate? A.Carter. B.Suzuki. C.Roiguez. C is correct.Momentum cpartly explaineshort-term unr-reaction to relevant information, anlonger term over-reaction anthus supports Roiguez’s view ththe technicanalysis partment hvalue. 3个人都反应了行为bias，考点在哪儿？
NO.PZ201511190100000508 问题如下 Whose statement regarng the technicanalysis partment is most accurate? A.Carter. B.Suzuki. C.Roiguez. C is correct.Momentum cpartly explaineshort-term unr-reaction to relevant information, anlonger term over-reaction anthus supports Roiguez’s view ththe technicanalysis partment hvalue. 请问在基础班讲义的哪一页？
NO.PZ201511190100000508 答案展开了题目中over-reaction和unr-reaction，它深情地说到 Momentum cpartly explaineshort-term unr-reaction to relevant information, anlonger term over-reaction 请问这是哪里的知识点？为什么unr-reaction对应着 short-term，而over-reaction对应着 long-term? 我感觉，短期也可以有over-reaction嘛，难道就不属于 momentum effect了么 谢谢！
老师您好，关于这个这道题的B，我看答案为“B说技术分析寻找的机会不是真正的市场异常，而是对高风险投资的补偿，这句话更像是在说基本面分析而不是技术分析。”这让我联想到之前的一道选择题“No.PZ2018091702000028”，因为规模、价值、惯性，这些都可以称为 market anomaly ，同时也是 risk exposure。所以B中，关于Suzuki believes ththe intifieopportunities are not ‘true’ market anomalies but rather they are associatewith higher risk exposures. 如果把not去掉的话是不是就正确了？
这题我看不懂？ 三个人发表了什么言论？ 可以一下题干和题目分别是什么意思吗？谢谢！
