开发者:上海品职教育科技有限公司 隐私政策详情

应用版本:4.2.11(IOS)|3.2.5(安卓)APP下载

我叫仙人涨 · 2019年12月23日

问一道题:NO.PZ201710020100000207 算哪个政策影响最大不是用减法么?

* 问题详情,请 查看题干

问题如下:

7 Based on Exhibit 1, which government policy has been most effective in helping Genovia achieve its second initiative?

选项:

A.

Tax on fossil fuels

B.

Subsidy on hydropower

C.

Subsidy on other renewables

解释:



C is correct. At the end of Year 2, the compound annual growth rate (CAGR) for each sector is calculated as follows: (Year 2/Year 0)0.5 – 1

Fossil fuels = (426/462)0.5 – 1 = –4% Hydropower = (273/186)0.5 – 1 = 21% Other renewables = (154/97)0.5 – 1 = 26%.

The CAGR indicates that the 26% increase in production from the subsidy on other renewables has been more effective than the 4% decrease in production from the tax on fossil fuels or the 21% increase in production from the subsidy on hydropower. Thus, the subsidy on other renewables of 26% is the highest, indicating that this policy has been the most effective in helping Genovia achieve its second initiative.

考点:Regulatory Tools

解析:首先我们根据表格计算一下政府实施政策后,不同发电来源产电的变化。

Fossil fuels = (426/462)0.5– 1 = –4%

Hydropower = (273/186)0.5– 1 = 21%

Other renewables = (154/97)0.5 – 1 = 26%.

从计算结果看,石化燃料发电降低了4%,风力发电增加了21%,其他再生资源发电增加了26%。因此从环保节能的角度而言,其他再生资源收获的效果最大。



算哪个政策影响最大不是用减法么?

答案是用占比率,不是比较绝对值么

1 个答案

源_品职助教 · 2019年12月24日

嗨,爱思考的PZer你好:


原版书给出的思路就是算占比率。所以考试的时候按照原版书的方法算就可以了

绝对值没有考虑到初始规模的影响,所以不是非常的贴切。


-------------------------------
虽然现在很辛苦,但努力过的感觉真的很好,加油!


  • 1

    回答
  • 1

    关注
  • 391

    浏览
相关问题

NO.PZ201710020100000207 问题如下 7 Baseon Exhibit 1, whigovernment polihbeen most effective in helping Genovia achieve its seconinitiative? A.Ton fossil fuels B.Subsi on hyopower C.Subsi on other renewables C is correct. the enof Ye2, the compounannugrowth rate (CAGR) for easector is calculatefollows: (Ye2/Ye0)0.5 – 1Fossil fuels = (426/462)0.5 – 1 = –4% Hyopower = (273/186)0.5 – 1 = 21% Other renewables = (154/97)0.5 – 1 = 26%.The CAGR incates ththe 26% increase in proction from the subsi on other renewables hbeen more effective ththe 4% crease in proction from the ton fossil fuels or the 21% increase in proction from the subsi on hyopower. Thus, the subsi on other renewables of 26% is the highest, incating ththis polihbeen the most effective in helping Genovia achieve its seconinitiative.考点Regulatory Tools解析首先我们根据表格计算一下政府实施政策后,不同发电来源产电的变化。Fossil fuels = (426/462)0.5– 1 = –4%Hyopower = (273/186)0.5– 1 = 21%Other renewables = (154/97)0.5 – 1 = 26%.从计算结果看,石化燃料发电降低了4%,风力发电增加了21%,其他再生资源发电增加了26%。因此从环保节能的角度而言,其他再生资源收获的效果最大。 如果是四年,计算公式是什么?

2022-12-31 23:45 2 · 回答

NO.PZ201710020100000207 No.PZ2018091706000055 (选择题)来源: 品职出题 Recently Analyst Bob is stuing regulatory environment in a country. 4 years ago, the country aocates environment-frieny power generation. So the government increases taxes on cofuel anprovis subsies on solpower anwinpower generation. Bob fin some changes in electricity generation proction following table shows. Accorng to the table, whigovernment poliis most effective? 为什么不选C?

2022-01-18 11:10 1 · 回答

要是算占比,直接finvalue / initivalue -1 不就好了? 为什么要开方?

2019-12-23 13:28 1 · 回答

使用(year2-year0)/year0再开方,与(year2/year0)0.5-1求出来的值不应该都是年化增长率?为什么选择第二种计算方式?

2019-11-29 06:47 1 · 回答