开发者:上海品职教育科技有限公司 隐私政策详情

应用版本:4.2.11(IOS)|3.2.5(安卓)APP下载

eee · 2019年05月26日

关于MVO的一道官网题目



Swan:

MVO portfolios are diversified with respect to risk factors such as value, size, and quality.

Gruber:

MVO portfolios are more sensitive to measurement errors in the expected return than to measurement errors in correlation and risk.

Morrison:

Some of the issues with MVO can be corrected by using reverse optimization to solve for risk parameters based on inputs for expected return and correlation.




Q. In the discussion of the criticisms of MVO portfolios, the most accurate statement is made by:

  1. Morrison.
  2. Swan.
  3. Gruber.

Solution

C is correct. Gruber is correct. MVO portfolios are more sensitive to measurement errors in the expected return than to measurement errors in correlation and risk.

A is incorrect. Reverse optimization uses inputs for risk and correlation (or covariance) to solve for expected return.

B is incorrect. MVO portfolios are based on market risk only.

1、swan 说的价值 size quality 这些因素和market risk是什么关系?为什么MVO没有分散这些因素?

2、为什么说MVO对预期收益更敏感而不是相关系数?我记得MVO输入变量应该有预期收入,然后衡量风险的时候也需要相关系数,二者应该都很重要吧
 

1 个答案
已采纳答案

Shimin_CPA税法主讲、CFA教研 · 2019年05月26日

1. value size quality属于股票个体的风险,描述的是公司价值、规模、债券质量,因此是非系统性风险。 market risk 是宏观经济层面的,属于系统性风险。 MVO中的风险sigma,既包含了系统性风险,又包括了非系统性风险。因为MVO的方法是画有效前沿,而有效前沿的横坐标是sigma,代表total risk

2. 第二个问题考得细, MVO输入变量三个都很重,但是 expected return 从实证研究发现是最难估计的。以下为原版书R19的截图。基础班提到了,在视频R19: Mean-variance optimization (4): Criticisms

  • 1

    回答
  • 2

    关注
  • 1241

    浏览
相关问题