问题如下图：
选项：
A. 
B. 
C. 
解释：
老师，我想问问，如果他分得清fact&opinion, 他的表述应该是什么样的呢？
是不是应该说： we think/assume ....div could increase by ....? 这样吗？
NO.PZ2016032801000010问题如下Scott works for a regionbrokerage firm. He estimates thWalkton Instries will increase its vinUS$1.50 a share ring the next year. He realizes ththis increase is contingent on penng legislation thwoul if enacte give Walkton a substantitbreak. The US representative for Walkton’s home strihtolScott that, although she is lobbying harfor the bill anprospects for its passage are favorable, concern of the US Congress over the ferficit coulcause the tbill to votewn. Walkton Instries hnot ma any statements about a change in vinpolicy. Scott writes in his researreport, \"We expeWalkton’s stoprito rise least US$8.00 a share the enof the yebecause the vinwill increase US$1.50 a share. Investors buying the stothe current time shoulexpeto realize a totreturn of least 15% on the stock.\" Accorng to the Stanr:A.Scott violatethe Stanr because he usemateriinsi information.B.Scott violatethe Stanr because he faileto separate opinion from fact.C.Scott violatethe Stanr basing his researon uncertain prections of future government action.B is correct.This question relates to StanrV(–Communication with Clients anProspective Clients. Scott hissuea researreport stating thhe expects the priof Walkton Instries stoto rise US$8 a share \"because the vinwill increase\" US$1.50 per share. He hma this statement knowing ththe vinwill increase only if Congress enacts certain legislation, uncertain prospect. stating ththe vinwill increase, Scott faileto separate fafrom opinion. The information regarng passage of legislation is not materinonpublic information because it is conjecture, anthe question es not state whether the US representative gave Scott her opinion on the passage of the legislation in confince. She coulhave been offering this opinion to anyone who aske Therefore, statement A is incorrect. It macceptable to base a recommention, in part, on expectation of future events, even though they muncertain. Therefore, answer C is incorrect.有expect表示观点为什么还说主人公没有区分事实和观点，实际上分析师写报告也不能通篇we expehope呀，写一个就够了吧
NO.PZ2016032801000010 不是有代表告诉他信息么？信息属于小道消息么~那B的理解呢？没想太明白
Scott violatethe Stanr because he faileto separate opinion from fact. Scott violatethe Stanr basing his researon uncertain prections of future government action. B is correct. This question relates to StanrV(–Communication with Clients anProspective Clients. Scott hissuea researreport stating thhe expects the priof Walkton Instries stoto rise US$8 a share \"because the vinwill increase\" US$1.50 per share. He hma this statement knowing ththe vinwill increase only if Congress enacts certain legislation, uncertain prospect. stating ththe vinwill increase, Scott faileto separate fafrom opinion. The information regarng passage of legislation is not materinonpublic information because it is conjecture, anthe question es not state whether the US representative gave Scott her opinion on the passage of the legislation in confince. She coulhave been offering this opinion to anyone who aske Therefore, statement A is incorrect. It macceptable to base a recommention, in part, on expectation of future events, even though they muncertain. Therefore, answer C is incorrect.他说的“we expect” 不就是他自己的opinion吗？怎么判断应该看这里的动词还是后面的will increase啊？感觉前面是观点后面是事实
没看懂过往关于C的，麻烦请再说一次，谢谢
