开发者:上海品职教育科技有限公司 隐私政策详情

应用版本:4.2.11(IOS)|3.2.5(安卓)APP下载

Sophie · 2019年05月19日

官网practices里,equity的第二个case的第五题,RI的2种方法的计算方法不同,求解答

Armishaw next presents Exhibit 2, which contains the basis for his estimates for the share price (as of 15 January 2014) if he assumes a terminal value in 2023 arising from treating 2023’s residual income as a perpetuity.

Exhibit 2

Stack questions Armishaw’s assumption in his 2014 valuation (Exhibit 2) that a perpetuity would best describe the terminal value of the stream and suggests that residual income should fade over time. Stack further suggests that a persistence factor of 0.50 might be appropriate.

Using the information in Exhibit 2, comparing Armishaw’s approach to terminal value to Stack’s approach, Stack’s assumption leads to a 2024 value that is approximately:

A.   $6.50 lower than Armishaw’s approach.

B.    $6.74 lower than Armishaw’s approach.

C.    $26.30 higher than Armishaw’s approach.

解答:


请问, 为什么,持续因子为1的时候, 要用2023年 的RI来计算;而持续 因子为0.5的时候,  就要用2024年的RI来计算?

1 个答案
已采纳答案

maggie_品职助教 · 2019年05月19日

你的理解是正确是,这道题答案错了(可以不用看了),李老师在经典题的时候讲了。不应该先增长一年再fade over...我把李老师的板书给你,红框里面是正确的解法:


  • 1

    回答
  • 0

    关注
  • 607

    浏览
相关问题