开发者:上海品职教育科技有限公司 隐私政策详情

应用版本:4.2.11(IOS)|3.2.5(安卓)APP下载

eee · 2019年04月15日

书后题第一个case两道题目问题

主要是4/5/6三道题目,主要的问题是似乎题目涉及的问题并不是standard任何原文,而是实务问题,似乎没有办法考虑:


After the meeting, Locke is not satisfied with Black’s comments and decides that further action is required. He also decides that he will allow NGM to continue to manage Fund assets until he finishes his evaluation. This decision is based on the superior returns of the NGM-managed assets, the significant diversification this portfolio adds to the Fund, and also the political implications of firing the local money manager.

(Institute 212)

4、After his initial meeting with Black, does Locke’s decision to allow NGM to continue managing the portfolio violate the CFA Institute Standards of Professional Conduct?

  1. No.

  2. Yes, because he allowed political factors to influence his decision.

  3. Yes, because he is obligated to immediately suspend NGM until he finishes his evaluation.

(Institute 212)

此题题干有叙述,black已经违反了ips,我认为这题也可以选c,答案认为马上suspend有违客户利益,而我认为允许一个违反ips的manager继续管理才是有违客户利益,到底选a还是选c似乎并不能从教材原文得到答案,我觉得这似乎是个实务问题,不明白这个度如何掌握,尤其是后面还有第6题,经过一个继续的询问过程,最终还是把这个manager解雇了,第6题就可以解雇,第四题就可以允许继续管理,之间只差了一个询问过程,我觉得这里很难判断。



“I will mail you a copy of our new procedures stating that trade allocations must be reviewed at the end of each month against clients’ IPS. It also says that interest will be credited to accounts that have been incorrectly allocated shares and debited from those accounts that should have received shares.”

(Institute 212)


5. With regard to Locke’s condition regarding trade allocation, does Black’s response violate the CFA Institute Standards of Professional Conduct with respect to allocation reviews and interest adjustments, respectively?

  1. Yes.

  2. No, it violates the standards only with respect to allocation reviews.

  3. No, it violates the standards only with respect to interest adjustments.

(Institute 212-213)

每个月review allocation这个频率对吗,教材原文似乎没提到,而后面账户利息和股票错误配置的处理问题似乎完全是实务问题,这个没接触过怎么做啊?似乎已经不是道德问题了,三级道题题目都是这样吗?










1 个答案
已采纳答案

发亮_品职助教 · 2019年04月17日

这道题算是偏难,主要是有点偏的感觉。原版书正文的道德题目,并不是特别的好,Handbook和一级讲义里面列出来的例题(讲义的例题摘自Handbook)是比较好的,虽然是一道一道的小题,但是都是核心的条例。

理解到这些核心条例,考试应该问题不大。同样,我自己感觉做道德题,碰到拿捏不准的,要回头看看正文的措辞,有时候行为措辞本身就存在一定的倾向描述。比如,下面的描述:

He also decides that he will allow NGM to continue to manage Fund assets until he finishes his evaluation. This decision is based on the superior returnsof the NGM-managed assets, the significant diversification this portfolio adds to the Fund, and also the political implications of firing the local money manager.

是暂时让NGM继续管理,直到完成评估。第二是NGM的收益还是非常好的、第三点是NGM提供非常好的分散化效果、第四点是政治影响。

从以上加黑粗体可以看出,这样的语句就是有一定倾斜描述的,NGM的存在,是有利于整个Portfolio的,就算立即换点,整个Portfolio肯定是不如当前状态的,并且locke也说了,是让他暂时继续管理,完成最终评估后再觉得是否继续与NGM合作。

题目也说是After initial meeting,初步会议结束后,继续让NGM暂时管理,是确实使得客户利益最大化的。


第五题这句题干其实写的容易有歧义。正式考试是不会有歧义的。

从这道题的答案来看,正文这句关于Trade allocation的信息,错误的原因是:应该在Trade allocation之前Review客户的IPS,看看Trade是否适合客户,而不是在Trade allocation之后Review客户的IPS。也就是说在分配之前看客户的IPS是否合适;

而题干信息是说:trade allocations must be reviewed at the end of each month against clients’ IPS

题干信息说的是在月末Review IPS,看看Trade allocation是否合适;

其实题干这么说,就是认为Trade allocation已经在月中、或者前面发生了,然后才Reivew看看Trade是否满足IPS。其实正文信息这么写,有点歧义让人看不明白是在表达这层意思。但是从准则上来说:显然,这种事后的Review是错误的,应该做到事前(分配前)Review。

所以这里的重点不是频率,Review的频率Reasonable即可。

  • 1

    回答
  • 0

    关注
  • 942

    浏览
相关问题