开发者:上海品职教育科技有限公司 隐私政策详情

应用版本:4.2.11(IOS)|3.2.5(安卓)APP下载

自然音 · 2019年03月27日

Reading 29

教材中 Example 9 上面的表格中说到 "Shorting may amplify the active risk."

However, in the second paragraph of the Solution to 1 of Example 10, it says that "Adding the ability to short...can be expected to reduce the tracking error..."


这两种说法是矛盾的。

请问如何理解?谢谢!

3 个答案
已采纳答案

自然音 · 2019年04月05日

以下是CFA官方的回复

Unfortunately the exact impact of shorting on risk (market risk or active risk) will really depend on circumstances.
The same tool (leverage and short selling in this case) can do either good or harm. It depends on the objective of the product. Short-selling can reduce market risk but can amplify active risk, for example. However, it can also perhaps reduce Active Risk such as reducing a sector overweight on the long side using securities that appear least attractive within a sector.

Perhaps the best statement would be: Shorting may or may not amplify active risk and shorting can be used to facilitate better distribution of risk.

An important statement is in the middle of page 510 where the paragraph says: "But the ability to reduce overall risk and to distribute sources of risk more evenly cannot be optimally achieved without short- selling." Here the crucial word is "optimally", as one just cannot do so well without short-selling.

I hope this is helpful.

maggie_品职助教 · 2019年03月29日

哦,不要被标题唬住哈,这几页的标题都是这个(这是按着原版书的小标题做的),你看前一页214页就是讲的卖空策略的潜在风险,咱们还是要看具体内容是什么。long/short的优缺点就只有以下三点:

 

不过你提醒的很好,这个标题确实容易引起歧义,我们也反馈一下这个问题。加油。

maggie_品职助教 · 2019年03月28日


Example 9 上面的表格中说到 "Shorting may amplify the active risk."这里是单独说卖空策略的缺点(并不是long-short策略的缺点),而例题10第一问说的是在long only基础上加卖空后,相当于一个long-short策略它可以降低追踪误差。

  • 3

    回答
  • 0

    关注
  • 334

    浏览
相关问题