发展前景不好,那就是公司效益不好吧,那公司肯定分红也少啊,留存收益也少啊
为啥发展前景不好,就是指投资机会不好,所以要多分红?上面的那种理解 解释不通么?
问题如下图:
选项:
A.
B.
C.
解释:
NO.PZ2016012005000028 问题如下 Whiof the following factors woulnot tento associatewith a company having a low vinpayout ratio? A.High flotation costs on new equity issues. B.High trates on vin. C.Low growth prospects. C is correct.With low growth prospects, a company woultypically have a high payout ratio, returning fun to its shareholrs rather thretaining fun. 老师,A是增发的费用高,如何理解?C它是谁的增长率,如何理解?
High trates on vin. Low growth prospects. C is correct. With low growth prospects, a company woultypically have a high payout ratio, returning fun to its shareholrs rather thretaining fun. A为什么分红率低,可能意味着新股发行费用高呢?
这题非常让人迷惑,题目我理解是,以下哪个同公司的低分红比率无关。A,新股发行成本,显然和分红比率无关。B,分红税率高,公司不倾向于分红。肯定没错。C,诚然如果后续发展机会不大,公司倾向于多分红。但是否可以反过来理解为,目前的分红比率低,意味着公司的效益不好,而效益不好可能与未来的发展预期不好至少有一定的相关度。按照题面,似乎A更为符合“无关”这个说法。要么就是题面的表述不太准确。
High trates on vin. Low growth prospects. C is correct. With low growth prospects, a company woultypically have a high payout ratio, returning fun to its shareholrs rather thretaining fun. 分红的税比较高,应该只是对客户影响比较大,反而c,是不是前景不好的时候,公司要留更多的钱,看上去似乎更合理一些?
如果分红少,那么按照公式1-T要大呀,那么T要小呀,为什么不选B呢