开发者:上海品职教育科技有限公司 隐私政策详情

应用版本:4.2.11(IOS)｜3.2.5(安卓)APP下载

返回

mino酱是个小破货 · 2025年06月29日

烦请问下老师这么回答可以吗？谢谢老师。

  1. CFA III
  2. 机构IPS

NO.PZ2023010409000024

问题如下：

The hypothetical Ivy University Endowment was established in 1901 and supports Ivy University. The endowment supports about 40% of the university’s operating budget. Historically, the endowment has invested in a traditional 20% public US equities, 80% US Treasury portfolio, and it is entirely implemented through passive investment vehicles.

The investment staff at the endowment is relatively small. With the appointment of a new chief investment officer, the investment policy is being reviewed. Endowment assets are US$250 million, and the endowment has a spending policy of paying out 5% of the 3-year rolling asset value to the university.

The new CIO has engaged an investment consultant to assist her with the investment policy review. The investment consultant has provided the following 10-year (nominal) expected return assumptions for various asset classes: US equities: 7%, Non-US equities: 8%, US Treasuries: 2%, hedge funds: 5%, private equity: 10%. In addition, the investment consultant believes that the endowment could generate an additional 50 bps in alpha from active management in equities. Expected inflation for the next 10 years is 2%.

The new CIO was at a previous endowment that invested heavily in private investments and hedge funds and recommends a change in the investment policy to the board of Ivy University Endowment.

She recommends investing 30% in private equity, 30% in hedge funds, 30% in public equities (15% US and 15% non-US with active management), and 10% in fixed income. This mix would have an expected real return of 5.1% based on the expected return assumptions provided by the investment consultant.

Should the board approve the new CIO’s recommendation? Provide your reasoning.

选项：

解释：

The board should reject the CIO’s recommendation. This is a very significant departure from the current practice. The size of the investment team is small, and they have no prior experience in managing hedge fund and private equity portfolios (except for the new CIO). Given the size of the endowment, it is unlikely to have access to top quartile managers in the hedge fund and PE spaces.

The board shouldn't approve the new CIO’s recommendation.

Since the endowment assets is small (US$250 million), the size of investment team is small and they have no prior investment experience in managing hedge funds and private equity portfolios. What's more, it can't access to external top managers in the HF and PE. In the new In CIO's recommendation, it invests 30% in private equity, 30% in hedge funds which is too high for a small size endowment fund.

添加评论
1 个答案

Lucky_品职助教 · 2025年06月30日

嗨，爱思考的PZer你好：


同学，我看到你提交了很多针对于主观题作答答案是否合适的问题，我在这里给同学一些建议。


对于主观题作答是否准确，主要有三个标准：

第一，最基本的就是你的答案一定要是方向正确的，也就是最开始的判断对错，拒接或接受，或是选择哪种方法等等，你的定位一定是正确的，否则后面如何解释都没有分数。

第二，最重要的是，你的答案一定要能够涵盖70%以上的，针对问题所需要的知识点，不可遗漏或是张冠李戴的比例过大，比如说让你分析某种方式的优点，讲义中给出的是3点，你最起码有能够答出2点，并且也不能把其他方法的优点混淆在一起。

第三，需要你的答案，以点的形式表达，并且语句和用词都尽可能的准确和简洁，目的有三个，一是逻辑清楚，二是节省时间，三是让阅卷人知道你在说什么。


对于具体的操作，有两个建议：

第一，自己写完答案后，与题目给出的答案解析相互对照一下，这样无论是方向的判断，还是知识点的涵盖范围以及准确性，都能够得到验证，这一步能够解决前两条标准。

第二，你可以找一个AI的软件，把你已经通过验证后的答案交给AI，让他帮你以分点的形式表述，并且尽可能的简洁。此步骤经过多几道题的操作后，你就能够清楚如何将答案写的即省时又省立。


所以说，这两个步骤以及所能解决的三个标准，都是同学可以通过自己的操作来完成的，这样对于同学真正能够掌握主观题的答题方法，事半功倍。

以前也有过同学和你一样，几乎每一道主观题都会提交上来问是否合适，但其实我们每一道题给出一个建议，实际上并不能够真正让同学掌握可以举一反三的答题方式。

所以，根据经验来看，我这边就不给同学一一做解答了，同学可以尝试着用我建议的方法联系一下，如果遇到具体的知识点疑惑或是关于考试中的具体问题，可随时提问，我定会知无不言。

还望理解。

----------------------------------------------
就算太阳没有迎着我们而来，我们正在朝着它而去，加油！

  • 1

    回答

  • 0

    关注

  • 4

    浏览
相关问题

NO.PZ2023010409000024 问题如下 The hypotheticIvy UniversityEnwment westablishein 1901 ansupports Ivy University. The enwmentsupports about 40% of the university’s operating buet. Historically, theenwment hinvestein a tration20% public US equities, 80% US Treasuryportfolio, anit is entirely implementethrough passive investment vehicles. The investmentstaff the enwment is relatively small. With the appointment of a new chiefinvestment officer, the investment poliis being reviewe Enwment assetsare US$250 million, anthe enwment ha spenng poliof paying out 5% ofthe 3-yerolling asset value to the university.The new CIO hasengageinvestment consultant to assist her with the investment policyreview. The investment consultant hprovithe following 10-ye(nominal)expectereturn assumptions for various asset classes: US equities: 7%, Non-USequities: 8%, US Treasuries: 2%, hee fun: 5%, private equity: 10%. Inaition, the investment consultant believes ththe enwment coulgenerateaition50 bps in alpha from active management in equities. Expectenflation for the next 10 years is 2%.The new CIO wata previous enwment thinvesteheavily in private investments anheefun anrecommen a change in the investment polito the boarof IvyUniversity Enwment. She recommeninvesting 30% in private equity, 30% in hee fun, 30% in public equities(15% US an15% non-US with active management), an10% in fixeincome. Thismix woulhave expecterereturn of 5.1% baseon the expectereturnassumptions provithe investment consultant.Shoulthe boarpprove the new CIO’s recommention? Provi your reasoning. The boarshoulrejethe CIO’s recommention. This is a very significant parture from the current practice. The size of the investment teis small, anthey have no prior experienin managing hee funanprivate equity portfolios (except for the new CIO). Given the size of the enwment, it is unlikely to have access to top quartile managers in the hee funanPE spaces. \"it is unlikely to have access to top quartile managers in the hee funanPE spaces.\"这句话我用“Susmall asset size woulharto have access to the skilleoutsourcemanager. ”来代替可以吗

2025-04-23 15:05 1 · 回答

NO.PZ2023010409000024 问题如下 The hypotheticIvy UniversityEnwment westablishein 1901 ansupports Ivy University. The enwmentsupports about 40% of the university’s operating buet. Historically, theenwment hinvestein a tration20% public US equities, 80% US Treasuryportfolio, anit is entirely implementethrough passive investment vehicles. The investmentstaff the enwment is relatively small. With the appointment of a new chiefinvestment officer, the investment poliis being reviewe Enwment assetsare US$250 million, anthe enwment ha spenng poliof paying out 5% ofthe 3-yerolling asset value to the university.The new CIO hasengageinvestment consultant to assist her with the investment policyreview. The investment consultant hprovithe following 10-ye(nominal)expectereturn assumptions for various asset classes: US equities: 7%, Non-USequities: 8%, US Treasuries: 2%, hee fun: 5%, private equity: 10%. Inaition, the investment consultant believes ththe enwment coulgenerateaition50 bps in alpha from active management in equities. Expectenflation for the next 10 years is 2%.The new CIO wata previous enwment thinvesteheavily in private investments anheefun anrecommen a change in the investment polito the boarof IvyUniversity Enwment. She recommeninvesting 30% in private equity, 30% in hee fun, 30% in public equities(15% US an15% non-US with active management), an10% in fixeincome. Thismix woulhave expecterereturn of 5.1% baseon the expectereturnassumptions provithe investment consultant.Shoulthe boarpprove the new CIO’s recommention? Provi your reasoning. The boarshoulrejethe CIO’s recommention. This is a very significant parture from the current practice. The size of the investment teis small, anthey have no prior experienin managing hee funanprivate equity portfolios (except for the new CIO). Given the size of the enwment, it is unlikely to have access to top quartile managers in the hee funanPE spaces. The enwment supports about 40% of the university’s operating buet. 这个enwment需要支持大学40%的支出，是否可以从high liquity nee这个角度说明大比例投资alternative Investment也是不合适的？

2025-02-06 22:08 1 · 回答

NO.PZ2023010409000024 问题如下 The hypotheticIvy UniversityEnwment westablishein 1901 ansupports Ivy University. The enwmentsupports about 40% of the university’s operating buet. Historically, theenwment hinvestein a tration20% public US equities, 80% US Treasuryportfolio, anit is entirely implementethrough passive investment vehicles. The investmentstaff the enwment is relatively small. With the appointment of a new chiefinvestment officer, the investment poliis being reviewe Enwment assetsare US$250 million, anthe enwment ha spenng poliof paying out 5% ofthe 3-yerolling asset value to the university.The new CIO hasengageinvestment consultant to assist her with the investment policyreview. The investment consultant hprovithe following 10-ye(nominal)expectereturn assumptions for various asset classes: US equities: 7%, Non-USequities: 8%, US Treasuries: 2%, hee fun: 5%, private equity: 10%. Inaition, the investment consultant believes ththe enwment coulgenerateaition50 bps in alpha from active management in equities. Expectenflation for the next 10 years is 2%.The new CIO wata previous enwment thinvesteheavily in private investments anheefun anrecommen a change in the investment polito the boarof IvyUniversity Enwment. She recommeninvesting 30% in private equity, 30% in hee fun, 30% in public equities(15% US an15% non-US with active management), an10% in fixeincome. Thismix woulhave expecterereturn of 5.1% baseon the expectereturnassumptions provithe investment consultant.Shoulthe boarpprove the new CIO’s recommention? Provi your reasoning. The boarshoulrejethe CIO’s recommention. This is a very significant parture from the current practice. The size of the investment teis small, anthey have no prior experienin managing hee funanprivate equity portfolios (except for the new CIO). Given the size of the enwment, it is unlikely to have access to top quartile managers in the hee funanPE spaces. 这题拒绝的理由是团队小，没有经验。但是题目中给的这句话说新的cio有经验，这句话不可以证明团队有经验么？“The new CIO wa previous enwment thinvesteheavily in private investments anhee fun ”

2025-01-13 05:51 1 · 回答

NO.PZ2023010409000024 问题如下 The hypotheticIvy UniversityEnwment westablishein 1901 ansupports Ivy University. The enwmentsupports about 40% of the university’s operating buet. Historically, theenwment hinvestein a tration20% public US equities, 80% US Treasuryportfolio, anit is entirely implementethrough passive investment vehicles. The investmentstaff the enwment is relatively small. With the appointment of a new chiefinvestment officer, the investment poliis being reviewe Enwment assetsare US$250 million, anthe enwment ha spenng poliof paying out 5% ofthe 3-yerolling asset value to the university.The new CIO hasengageinvestment consultant to assist her with the investment policyreview. The investment consultant hprovithe following 10-ye(nominal)expectereturn assumptions for various asset classes: US equities: 7%, Non-USequities: 8%, US Treasuries: 2%, hee fun: 5%, private equity: 10%. Inaition, the investment consultant believes ththe enwment coulgenerateaition50 bps in alpha from active management in equities. Expectenflation for the next 10 years is 2%.The new CIO wata previous enwment thinvesteheavily in private investments anheefun anrecommen a change in the investment polito the boarof IvyUniversity Enwment. She recommeninvesting 30% in private equity, 30% in hee fun, 30% in public equities(15% US an15% non-US with active management), an10% in fixeincome. Thismix woulhave expecterereturn of 5.1% baseon the expectereturnassumptions provithe investment consultant.Shoulthe boarpprove the new CIO’s recommention? Provi your reasoning. The boarshoulrejethe CIO’s recommention. This is a very significant parture from the current practice. The size of the investment teis small, anthey have no prior experienin managing hee funanprivate equity portfolios (except for the new CIO). Given the size of the enwment, it is unlikely to have access to top quartile managers in the hee funanPE spaces. 题目要求的回报率是5%+0.5%，但建议组合下只有5.1%，所以基于这个理由，是否也是应该要拒绝的？

2023-08-29 13:49 1 · 回答