开发者:上海品职教育科技有限公司 隐私政策详情

应用版本:4.2.11(IOS)|3.2.5(安卓)APP下载

这个四月不太冷 · 2025年06月24日

题目也没问是相对估值法还是绝对估值法?还是不理解

NO.PZ2024021802000059

问题如下:

In contrast to applying corporate governance as a risk assessment tool, incorporating corporate governance into a valuation model results in adjusting the:

选项:

A.discount rate applied.

B.level of confidence in the valuation range.

C.level of confidence about the multiple on which future earnings are placed in the valuation.

解释:

A is correct because if the analysis of corporate governance is specifically built into valuation models, this analysis is most typically done by recognizing negative governance characteristics by way of adding a risk premium to the cost of capital or raising the discount rate applied.

B is incorrect because as a risk assessment tool, corporate governance may represent the level of confidence about future earnings or the multiple on which those earnings are placed in a valuation—or it may be reflected less in full financial models and more in a simple level of confidence in the valuation range or investment thesis. Therefore, the level of confidence in the valuation range is adjusted when corporate governance is applied as a risk assessment tool, not when it is incorporated into a valuation model.

C is incorrect because as a risk assessment tool, corporate governance may represent the level of confidence about future earnings or the multiple on which those earnings are placed in a valuation. Therefore, the level of confidence about the multiple on which future earnings are placed in the valuation is adjusted when corporate governance is applied as a risk assessment tool, not when it is incorporated into a valuation model.

题目也没问是相对估值法还是绝对估值法?还是不理解

1 个答案

王岑 · 2025年06月24日

嗨,爱思考的PZer你好:


我们先看这个题目的设定,是把公司治理当作估值模型的一部分。

也就是说,在建模的时候,如果你把公司治理当作估值模型的一部分(即建模),通常是在绝对估值模型中做调整,比如:

  • 贴现现金流模型(DCF)
  • 你会通过调整贴现率(discount rate)或者风险溢价(risk premium)来体现公司治理的好坏。

比如:

  • 一家治理结构差、管理层激励扭曲的公司,投资人会要求更高的回报率
  • 所以你会提高贴现率,导致估值变低
  • 这就是“将治理作为变量整合进估值模型”本身的意思

所以,答案是 A:discount rate 被调整

这道题目不需要考虑相对估值法或者是绝对估值法。

----------------------------------------------
虽然现在很辛苦,但努力过的感觉真的很好,加油!

  • 1

    回答
  • 0

    关注
  • 4

    浏览
相关问题

NO.PZ2024021802000059 问题如下 In contrast to applying corporate governana risk assessment tool, incorporating corporate governaninto a valuation mol results in austing the: A.scount rate applie B.level of confinin the valuation range. C.level of confinabout the multiple on whifuture earnings are placein the valuation. A is correbecause if the analysis of corporategovernanis specifically built into valuation mols, this analysis is mosttypically ne recognizing negative governancharacteristiwofaing a risk premium to the cost of capitor raising the scount rateapplieB is incorrebecause a risk assessment tool,corporate governanmrepresent the level of confinabout futureearnings or the multiple on whithose earnings are placein a valuation—orit mreflecteless in full financimols anmore in a simple level ofconfinin the valuation range or investment thesis. Therefore, the level ofconfinin the valuation range is austewhen corporate governanisappliea risk assessment tool, not when it is incorporateinto a valuationmol.C is incorrebecause a risk assessment tool,corporate governanmrepresent the level of confinabout futureearnings or the multiple on whithose earnings are placein a valuation.Therefore, the level of confinabout the multiple on whifuture earningsare placein the valuation is austewhen corporate governanis applieasa risk assessment tool, not when it is incorporateinto a valuation mol. 老师上课说,absolute valuation: 会根据ESG risk调整scount rate; relative valuation: 会根据ESG risk调整P/E。所以不太理解为什么C不对。

2024-12-29 08:22 1 · 回答

NO.PZ2024021802000059问题如下 In contrast to applying corporate governana risk assessment tool, incorporating corporate governaninto a valuation mol results in austing the:A.scount rate applieB.level of confinin the valuation range.C.level of confinabout the multiple on whifuture earnings are placein the valuation. A is correbecause if the analysis of corporategovernanis specifically built into valuation mols, this analysis is mosttypically ne recognizing negative governancharacteristiwofaing a risk premium to the cost of capitor raising the scount rateapplieB is incorrebecause a risk assessment tool,corporate governanmrepresent the level of confinabout futureearnings or the multiple on whithose earnings are placein a valuation—orit mreflecteless in full financimols anmore in a simple level ofconfinin the valuation range or investment thesis. Therefore, the level ofconfinin the valuation range is austewhen corporate governanisappliea risk assessment tool, not when it is incorporateinto a valuationmol.C is incorrebecause a risk assessment tool,corporate governanmrepresent the level of confinabout futureearnings or the multiple on whithose earnings are placein a valuation.Therefore, the level of confinabout the multiple on whifuture earningsare placein the valuation is austewhen corporate governanis applieasa risk assessment tool, not when it is incorporateinto a valuation mol. 关于这个题目有无对应原文

2024-08-12 12:44 1 · 回答

NO.PZ2024021802000059 问题如下 In contrast to applying corporate governana risk assessment tool, incorporating corporate governaninto a valuation mol results in austing the: A.scount rate applie B.level of confinin the valuation range. C.level of confinabout the multiple on whifuture earnings are placein the valuation. A is correbecause if the analysis of corporategovernanis specifically built into valuation mols, this analysis is mosttypically ne recognizing negative governancharacteristiwofaing a risk premium to the cost of capitor raising the scount rateapplieB is incorrebecause a risk assessment tool,corporate governanmrepresent the level of confinabout futureearnings or the multiple on whithose earnings are placein a valuation—orit mreflecteless in full financimols anmore in a simple level ofconfinin the valuation range or investment thesis. Therefore, the level ofconfinin the valuation range is austewhen corporate governanisappliea risk assessment tool, not when it is incorporateinto a valuationmol.C is incorrebecause a risk assessment tool,corporate governanmrepresent the level of confinabout futureearnings or the multiple on whithose earnings are placein a valuation.Therefore, the level of confinabout the multiple on whifuture earningsare placein the valuation is austewhen corporate governanis applieasa risk assessment tool, not when it is incorporateinto a valuation mol. 这道题的答案说明看不懂,请作进一步

2024-05-19 09:44 1 · 回答

NO.PZ2024021802000059问题如下 In contrast to applying corporate governana risk assessment tool, incorporating corporate governaninto a valuation mol results in austing the:A.scount rate applieB.level of confinin the valuation range.C.level of confinabout the multiple on whifuture earnings are placein the valuation. A is correbecause if the analysis of corporategovernanis specifically built into valuation mols, this analysis is mosttypically ne recognizing negative governancharacteristiwofaing a risk premium to the cost of capitor raising the scount rateapplieB is incorrebecause a risk assessment tool,corporate governanmrepresent the level of confinabout futureearnings or the multiple on whithose earnings are placein a valuation—orit mreflecteless in full financimols anmore in a simple level ofconfinin the valuation range or investment thesis. Therefore, the level ofconfinin the valuation range is austewhen corporate governanisappliea risk assessment tool, not when it is incorporateinto a valuationmol.C is incorrebecause a risk assessment tool,corporate governanmrepresent the level of confinabout futureearnings or the multiple on whithose earnings are placein a valuation.Therefore, the level of confinabout the multiple on whifuture earningsare placein the valuation is austewhen corporate governanis applieasa risk assessment tool, not when it is incorporateinto a valuation mol. 最后一句话,风险评估工具不能用于估值模型吗?

2024-04-17 19:18 1 · 回答