开发者:上海品职教育科技有限公司 隐私政策详情

应用版本:4.2.11(IOS)|3.2.5(安卓)APP下载

188****9315 · 2025年06月20日

为什么有些题目要考虑非财务因素?有些题目不用考虑?

NO.PZ2024021802000073

问题如下:

When using standardized frameworks to assess materiality, analysts are most likely to:

选项:

A.include factors that are not financially material.

B.stop using proprietary materiality assessments.

C.consider different ESG factors for companies in the same sector.

解释:

A. Incorrect because materiality is typically measured in terms of both the likelihood and magnitude of impact. Many practitioners focus exclusively on material ESG factors. Determining which ESG issues are most material involves judgment and is not an exact science. Frameworks such as the materiality maps provided by SASB (now part of the ISSB) provide guidance, but investment professionals often develop their own view on what is most material.

B. Incorrect because various stakeholders do not agree on how to define or report materiality, so developing proprietary materiality assessments alongside standardized frameworks continues to be an important competency for investors.

C. Correct because material ESG factors differ by companies in different sub-sectors of the same sector. Companies in the same sector might be judged to have different material ESG factors. For instance, in the health care industry, a medical insurer will have different material factors than a pharmaceutical company. And even in the same industry, individual companies can have different material factors.

要怎么识别和回答?为什么有些题目要考虑非财务因素?有些题目不用考虑?

1 个答案

净净_品职助教 · 2025年06月21日

嗨,爱思考的PZer你好:


逻辑在于:我们进行重大性分析的根本原因是因为要找出对财务回报有重大影响的ESG因素,如果投资不关注财务回报,则可以不考虑重大性分析。

记住一个例外即可,负面筛选中如信仰投资,投资目标关注的是投资标的是否符合自己的宗教信仰,而非财务回报,所以尽管类似烟草、军工类的股票有稳定的现金流或者可以获得超额回报,但是信仰投资依然会排除掉这些行业。


----------------------------------------------
努力的时光都是限量版,加油!

  • 1

    回答
  • 0

    关注
  • 6

    浏览
相关问题

其它问题 A包括非财务重要性的因子。是不是也是正确?A的解析没有说清楚。

2025-05-06 08:41 1 · 回答

NO.PZ2024021802000073 问题如下 When using stanrzeframeworks to assess materiality, analysts are most likely to: A.inclu factors thare not financially material. B.stop using proprietary materiality assessments. C.consir fferent ESG factors for companies in the same sector. Incorrebecause materiality is typically measurein terms of both the likelihooanmagnitu of impact. Many practitioners focus exclusively on materiESG factors. termining whiESG issues are most materiinvolves jument anis not exascience. Frameworks suthe materiality maps proviSASB (now part of the ISSprovi guince, but investment professionals often velop their own view on whis most material.Incorrebecause various stakeholrs not agree on how to fine or report materiality, so veloping proprietary materiality assessments alongsi stanrzeframeworks continues to important competenfor investors.Correbecause materiESG factors ffer companies in fferent sub-sectors of the same sector. Companies in the same sector might jueto have fferent materiESG factors. For instance, in the health care instry, a mecinsurer will have fferent materifactors tha pharmaceuticcompany. Aneven in the same instry, invicompanies chave fferent materifactors. b和c都对那为什么正确答案是C呢

2025-03-19 18:05 1 · 回答

NO.PZ2024021802000073问题如下When using stanrzeframeworks to assess materiality, analysts are most likely to:A.inclu factors thare not financially material.B.stop using proprietary materiality assessments.C.consir fferent ESG factors for companies in the same sector. Incorrebecause materiality is typically measurein terms of both the likelihooanmagnitu of impact. Many practitioners focus exclusively on materiESG factors. termining whiESG issues are most materiinvolves jument anis not exascience. Frameworks suthe materiality maps proviSASB (now part of the ISSprovi guince, but investment professionals often velop their own view on whis most material.Incorrebecause various stakeholrs not agree on how to fine or report materiality, so veloping proprietary materiality assessments alongsi stanrzeframeworks continues to important competenfor investors.Correbecause materiESG factors ffer companies in fferent sub-sectors of the same sector. Companies in the same sector might jueto have fferent materiESG factors. For instance, in the health care instry, a mecinsurer will have fferent materifactors tha pharmaceuticcompany. Aneven in the same instry, invicompanies chave fferent materifactors. c,当使用了标准化框架以后,每个行业的实质性评估不就一样了吗

2025-03-07 22:59 1 · 回答

NO.PZ2024021802000073问题如下When using stanrzeframeworks to assess materiality, analysts are most likely to:A.inclu factors thare not financially material.B.stop using proprietary materiality assessments.C.consir fferent ESG factors for companies in the same sector. Incorrebecause materiality is typically measurein terms of both the likelihooanmagnitu of impact. Many practitioners focus exclusively on materiESG factors. termining whiESG issues are most materiinvolves jument anis not exascience. Frameworks suthe materiality maps proviSASB (now part of the ISSprovi guince, but investment professionals often velop their own view on whis most material.Incorrebecause various stakeholrs not agree on how to fine or report materiality, so veloping proprietary materiality assessments alongsi stanrzeframeworks continues to important competenfor investors.Correbecause materiESG factors ffer companies in fferent sub-sectors of the same sector. Companies in the same sector might jueto have fferent materiESG factors. For instance, in the health care instry, a mecinsurer will have fferent materifactors tha pharmaceuticcompany. Aneven in the same instry, invicompanies chave fferent materifactors. 请问知识点在哪里🤔呢

2024-10-20 20:46 1 · 回答