开发者:上海品职教育科技有限公司 隐私政策详情

应用版本:4.2.11(IOS)|3.2.5(安卓)APP下载

SKY天天 · 2025年06月20日

老师,这种选择合适的方法的主观题,是可以用排除法说吗?还是只要说选择的那个方法就行?

NO.PZ2022122801000041

问题如下:

PZ is the sponsor of a $1.25 billion legacy DB plan, which is now frozen. The funded ratio is 0.8. The plan sponsor, receives three asset allocation approaches recommendations:

a surplus optimization approach.

an integrated asset–liability approach.

a hedging/return-seeking portfolios approach.

When evaluate asset allocation choices, consider the plan sponsor’s costs.

Determine which asset allocation approach would be most appropriate for the pension fund. Justify your response.

选项:

解释:

Surplus optimization approach is the most appropriate.

Surplus optimization does not require an overfunded status, while implementation of the basic two-portfolio approach depends on having an overfunded plan.

Integrating the liability portfolio with the asset portfolio, is the most comprehensive of the three approaches, but increased complexity.

老师,这种选择合适的方法类的主观题,可以用排除法说吗?还是只要说选择的那个方法就行?

比如下述,这样回答可以吗?比如说选1,只要说选1的理由,还是可以说不选2/3的理由,还是都行?谢谢。

A surplus optimization approach is the most appropriate asset allocation approach.

First,because the funded ratio is 0.8,so we can know the fund is underfunded now,which the asset can not cover the liability.so we don't use the hedging/return-seeking portfolios approach,which is suitable for the overfunded portfolio.

Second,When evaluate asset allocation choices, consider the plan sponsor’s costs.so we don't use an integrated asset–liability approach.Because it will costs a lot.

So,we choose a surplus optimization approach for seeking a higher portfolio return to make the asset become larger to cover the liability in the future.

1 个答案

Lucky_品职助教 · 2025年06月20日

嗨,从没放弃的小努力你好:


这样的主观题,同学只要针对你最终的选择进行展开解释就可以了,无需再说其他不合适的原因。因为大多数最终选择的原因,就是其他没有选择的原因,无需复述。

----------------------------------------------
努力的时光都是限量版,加油!

  • 1

    回答
  • 0

    关注
  • 4

    浏览
相关问题

NO.PZ2022122801000041 问题如下 PZ is the sponsor of a $1.25 billionlega plan, whiis now frozen. The funratio is 0.8. The plsponsor, receives three asset allocation approachesrecommentions: • a surplus optimization approach.• integrateasset–liability approach.• a heing/return-seeking portfolios approach.When evaluate asset allocation choices, consir the plansponsor’s costs. termine whiasset allocation approawoulmost appropriate for the pension fun Justify yourresponse. Surplus optimization approais the most appropriate.Surplus optimization es not require overfunstatus, while implementation of the basic two-portfolio approapen on having overfunplan.Integrating the liability portfolio with the asset portfolio, is the most comprehensive of the three approaches, but increasecomplexity. The most appropriate for the pension fun Now the plis only partifun so we can’t use a heing return-seeking approach. The integrateasset-liability approais comprehensive but complex with high costs.

2025-04-29 12:23 1 · 回答

NO.PZ2022122801000041 问题如下 PZ is the sponsor of a $1.25 billionlega plan, whiis now frozen. The funratio is 0.8. The plsponsor, receives three asset allocation approachesrecommentions: • a surplus optimization approach.• integrateasset–liability approach.• a heing/return-seeking portfolios approach.When evaluate asset allocation choices, consir the plansponsor’s costs. termine whiasset allocation approawoulmost appropriate for the pension fun Justify yourresponse. Surplus optimization approais the most appropriate.Surplus optimization es not require overfunstatus, while implementation of the basic two-portfolio approapen on having overfunplan.Integrating the liability portfolio with the asset portfolio, is the most comprehensive of the three approaches, but increasecomplexity. 不是很明白,integrateasset–liability approach也是不能unr fun?还是只是因为复杂而被排除(题干中也没看到关于复杂程度的描述啊)?

2024-08-06 14:39 1 · 回答

NO.PZ2022122801000041 问题如下 PZ is the sponsor of a $1.25 billionlega plan, whiis now frozen. The funratio is 0.8. The plsponsor, receives three asset allocation approachesrecommentions: • a surplus optimization approach.• integrateasset–liability approach.• a heing/return-seeking portfolios approach.When evaluate asset allocation choices, consir the plansponsor’s costs. termine whiasset allocation approawoulmost appropriate for the pension fun Justify yourresponse. Surplus optimization approais the most appropriate.Surplus optimization es not require overfunstatus, while implementation of the basic two-portfolio approapen on having overfunplan.Integrating the liability portfolio with the asset portfolio, is the most comprehensive of the three approaches, but increasecomplexity. two portfolio法中,basic要求overfunvariants不要求overfun题目中没有明确是用basic,那为什么通过funratio=0.8这个条件,把two portfolio法排除了呢

2024-07-14 11:58 2 · 回答

NO.PZ2022122801000041问题如下 PZ is the sponsor of a $1.25 billionlega plan, whiis now frozen. The funratio is 0.8. The plsponsor, receives three asset allocation approachesrecommentions: • a surplus optimization approach.• integrateasset–liability approach.• a heing/return-seeking portfolios approach.When evaluate asset allocation choices, consir the plansponsor’s costs. termine whiasset allocation approawoulmost appropriate for the pension fun Justify yourresponse. Surplus optimization approais the most appropriate.Surplus optimization es not require overfunstatus, while implementation of the basic two-portfolio approapen on having overfunplan.Integrating the liability portfolio with the asset portfolio, is the most comprehensive of the three approaches, but increasecomplexity. 这种如果不meet liability penalty 会很高,再加上 pllong term 而不是single perio 所以综合考虑 最全面的方式最好。Integrateapproacassess the probability of not being able to pfuture liabilities when they come e.

2024-06-24 23:44 1 · 回答