开发者:上海品职教育科技有限公司 隐私政策详情

应用版本:4.2.11(IOS)|3.2.5(安卓)APP下载

匿名网友 · 2025年06月20日

还是没明白为什么C不能选

NO.PZ2025012207000020

问题如下:

After a meeting with the representatives of a pension fund, a potential new limited partner, ABC Private Equity Fund, decided to divest from a profitable utility company that has a policy enforcing a mandatory 65-year-age retirement. The fund’s divestment decision is most likely to seek:

选项:

A.value creation for the managed portfolio of funds. B.a differentiating factor in attracting clients conscious of age discrimination. C.to manage risks that could impact the financial performance of its portfolio companies.

解释:

B is correct. With this decision, ABC Private Equity Fund is most likely to differentiate itself from private equity funds that are agnostic to age discrimination. Some investors see ESG integration as a way to differentiate themselves and attract capital from the growing pool of ESG-conscious capital allocators, such as pension funds, sovereign wealth funds, and family offices. So, they include ESG factors prominently in their investment approach and reporting to appeal to these limited partners.

强制65退休就是一个social方面的风险吧?

1 个答案

净净_品职助教 · 2025年06月20日

嗨,从没放弃的小努力你好:


C选项的核心含义是:ABC基金出于风险管理目的而退出投资,因为该公司存在一个可能影响其未来财务表现的风险(例如诉讼、声誉损害、人才流失等)。

那么“强制65岁退休政策,真的构成了财务上重大的、可量化的风险吗?”

通常:年龄歧视的政策可能引起争议,但除非已经产生严重法律诉讼、劳资纠纷或监管干预,否则它的财务影响往往是间接的、难以量化的。所以,这类社会问题更多被看作“声誉风险”或“道德风险”,而不是立即影响财务表现的“重大经营风险”。

因此,在没有明确证据表明这个政策会给目标公司带来重大财务损失时,C 选项作为主要动机就显得有些牵强。

----------------------------------------------
加油吧,让我们一起遇见更好的自己!