开发者:上海品职教育科技有限公司 隐私政策详情

应用版本:4.2.11(IOS)|3.2.5(安卓)APP下载

Alice_090 · 2025年05月18日

不理解这道题和discretionary有什么关系?

NO.PZ2022010501000014

问题如下:

Midwest National Bank manages a domestic equity portfolio for the Springfield Municipal Employees’ Retirement Fund (SMERF), a mature defined benefit pension plan. The SMERF portfolio is included in Midwest’s Institutional Equity composite. The composite description states, “Portfolios included in the Institutional Equity composite are actively managed for long-term capital appreciation.” SMERF’s investment policy statement includes the following provisions:

All security transactions must be approved in advance by the SMERF Investment Committee. SMERF anticipates making regular net withdrawals in substantial amounts from the portfolio to meet pension liabilities. SMERF staff will prepare a schedule of withdrawals at the beginning of each fiscal year. The portfolio manager must manage liquidity so as to disburse funds in accordance with the withdrawal schedule.

In view of these restrictions, discuss whether Midwest National Bank can justify including the SMERF portfolio in the composite.

选项:

解释:

The GIPS standards prohibit including non-discretionary portfolios in composites. IPS restrictions do not necessarily render a portfolio non-discretionary. It is up to the investment management firm to define discretion and to determine whether it has the discretion to implement the investment strategy, given the restrictions of the IPS. In this case, however, it appears likely that SMERF’s policy requiring transactions to be approved in advance by the Investment Committee and the pension plan’s liquidity needs prevent Midwest National Bank from fully implementing the investment objective of achieving long-term capital appreciation through active management. If so, Midwest National Bank must classify the SMERF portfolio as non-discretionary and exclude it from all composites.

GIPS 标准禁止在组合中包含非全权委托投资组合。 IPS 限制并不一定会使投资组合成为非全权委托。鉴于 IPS 的限制,由投资管理公司定义自由裁量权并确定其是否具有实施投资策略的自由裁量权。然而,在这种情况下,SMERF 要求交易事先获得投资委员会批准的政策以及养老金计划的流动性需求似乎阻碍了中西部国家银行全面实施通过积极管理实现长期资本增值的投资目标。如果是这样,中西部国家银行必须将 SMERF 投资组合归类为非全权委托,并将其从所有composites中排除。


正常的投资决策有投资委员会来投票决定这个不是正常的么?还是因为这个投资组合有频繁的liqudity需要,导致没有办法实施长期的投资策略因而产生conflict,所以才没有自主管理权?

1 个答案

伯恩_品职助教 · 2025年05月19日

嗨,努力学习的PZer你好:


因为这个投资委员会不是受托人的机构而是委托人的机构。实际的决策是委托人产生的

----------------------------------------------
就算太阳没有迎着我们而来,我们正在朝着它而去,加油!

  • 1

    回答
  • 0

    关注
  • 3

    浏览
相关问题

NO.PZ2022010501000014 问题如下 Miest NationBank manages a mestic equity portfolio for the SpringfielMunicipEmployees’ Retirement Fun(SMERF), a mature finebenefit pension plan. The SMERF portfolio is incluin Miest’s InstitutionEquity composite. The composite scription states, “Portfolios incluin the InstitutionEquity composite are actively managefor long-term capitappreciation.” SMERF’s investment polistatement inclus the following provisions:All security transactions must approvein aanthe SMERF Investment Committee. SMERF anticipates making regulnet withawals in substantiamounts from the portfolio to meet pension liabilities. SMERF staff will prepare a schele of withawals the beginning of eafiscyear. The portfolio manager must manage liquity so to sburse fun in accornwith the withawschele.In view of these restrictions, scuss whether Miest NationBank cjustify inclung the SMERF portfolio in the composite. The GIPS stanr prohibit inclung non-scretionary portfolios in composites. IPS restrictions not necessarily renr a portfolio non-scretionary. It is up to the investment management firm to fine scretion anto termine whether it hthe scretion to implement the investment strategy, given the restrictions of the IPS. In this case, however, it appears likely thSMERF’s polirequiring transactions to approvein aanthe Investment Committee anthe pension plan’s liquity nee prevent Miest NationBank from fully implementing the investment objective of achieving long-term capitappreciation through active management. If so, Miest NationBank must classify the SMERF portfolio non-scretionary anexclu it from all composites. GIPS 标准禁止在组合中包含非全权委托投资组合。 IPS 限制并不一定会使投资组合成为非全权委托。鉴于 IPS 的限制,由投资管理公司定义自由裁量权并确定其是否具有实施投资策略的自由裁量权。然而,在这种情况下,SMERF 要求交易事先获得投资委员会批准的政策以及养老金计划的流动性需求似乎阻碍了中西部国家银行全面实施通过积极管理实现长期资本增值的投资目标。如果是这样,中西部国家银行必须将 SMERF 投资组合归类为非全权委托,并将其从所有composites中排除。 题干提到significant amount withawal, 直接就定位到这个知识点了,根本没联系上non-screionary.

2025-05-14 22:37 1 · 回答

NO.PZ2022010501000014问题如下 Miest NationBank manages a mestic equity portfolio for the SpringfielMunicipEmployees’ Retirement Fun(SMERF), a mature finebenefit pension plan. The SMERF portfolio is incluin Miest’s InstitutionEquity composite. The composite scription states, “Portfolios incluin the InstitutionEquity composite are actively managefor long-term capitappreciation.” SMERF’s investment polistatement inclus the following provisions:All security transactions must approvein aanthe SMERF Investment Committee. SMERF anticipates making regulnet withawals in substantiamounts from the portfolio to meet pension liabilities. SMERF staff will prepare a schele of withawals the beginning of eafiscyear. The portfolio manager must manage liquity so to sburse fun in accornwith the withawschele.In view of these restrictions, scuss whether Miest NationBank cjustify inclung the SMERF portfolio in the composite. The GIPS stanr prohibit inclung non-scretionary portfolios in composites. IPS restrictions not necessarily renr a portfolio non-scretionary. It is up to the investment management firm to fine scretion anto termine whether it hthe scretion to implement the investment strategy, given the restrictions of the IPS. In this case, however, it appears likely thSMERF’s polirequiring transactions to approvein aanthe Investment Committee anthe pension plan’s liquity nee prevent Miest NationBank from fully implementing the investment objective of achieving long-term capitappreciation through active management. If so, Miest NationBank must classify the SMERF portfolio non-scretionary anexclu it from all composites. GIPS 标准禁止在组合中包含非全权委托投资组合。 IPS 限制并不一定会使投资组合成为非全权委托。鉴于 IPS 的限制,由投资管理公司定义自由裁量权并确定其是否具有实施投资策略的自由裁量权。然而,在这种情况下,SMERF 要求交易事先获得投资委员会批准的政策以及养老金计划的流动性需求似乎阻碍了中西部国家银行全面实施通过积极管理实现长期资本增值的投资目标。如果是这样,中西部国家银行必须将 SMERF 投资组合归类为非全权委托,并将其从所有composites中排除。 The pension plan’s liquity nee prevent Miest NationBank from fully implementing the investment objective of achieving long-term capitappreciation through active management.So this non-scretionary portfolio cannot incluin the composite.

2025-05-11 16:56 1 · 回答

NO.PZ2022010501000014 问题如下 Miest NationBank manages a mestic equity portfolio for the SpringfielMunicipEmployees’ Retirement Fun(SMERF), a mature finebenefit pension plan. The SMERF portfolio is incluin Miest’s InstitutionEquity composite. The composite scription states, “Portfolios incluin the InstitutionEquity composite are actively managefor long-term capitappreciation.” SMERF’s investment polistatement inclus the following provisions:All security transactions must approvein aanthe SMERF Investment Committee. SMERF anticipates making regulnet withawals in substantiamounts from the portfolio to meet pension liabilities. SMERF staff will prepare a schele of withawals the beginning of eafiscyear. The portfolio manager must manage liquity so to sburse fun in accornwith the withawschele.In view of these restrictions, scuss whether Miest NationBank cjustify inclung the SMERF portfolio in the composite. The GIPS stanr prohibit inclung non-scretionary portfolios in composites. IPS restrictions not necessarily renr a portfolio non-scretionary. It is up to the investment management firm to fine scretion anto termine whether it hthe scretion to implement the investment strategy, given the restrictions of the IPS. In this case, however, it appears likely thSMERF’s polirequiring transactions to approvein aanthe Investment Committee anthe pension plan’s liquity nee prevent Miest NationBank from fully implementing the investment objective of achieving long-term capitappreciation through active management. If so, Miest NationBank must classify the SMERF portfolio non-scretionary anexclu it from all composites. GIPS 标准禁止在组合中包含非全权委托投资组合。 IPS 限制并不一定会使投资组合成为非全权委托。鉴于 IPS 的限制,由投资管理公司定义自由裁量权并确定其是否具有实施投资策略的自由裁量权。然而,在这种情况下,SMERF 要求交易事先获得投资委员会批准的政策以及养老金计划的流动性需求似乎阻碍了中西部国家银行全面实施通过积极管理实现长期资本增值的投资目标。如果是这样,中西部国家银行必须将 SMERF 投资组合归类为非全权委托,并将其从所有composites中排除。 Miest NationBank can't inclu the SMERF portfolio in the composite.Sinall security transactions must approvein aanthe SMERF Investment Committee, Miest NationBank can't the scretion investment itself whican't meet the requirement of the composite.

2025-03-27 21:08 1 · 回答

NO.PZ2022010501000014 问题如下 Miest NationBank manages a mestic equity portfolio for the SpringfielMunicipEmployees’ Retirement Fun(SMERF), a mature finebenefit pension plan. The SMERF portfolio is incluin Miest’s InstitutionEquity composite. The composite scription states, “Portfolios incluin the InstitutionEquity composite are actively managefor long-term capitappreciation.” SMERF’s investment polistatement inclus the following provisions:All security transactions must approvein aanthe SMERF Investment Committee. SMERF anticipates making regulnet withawals in substantiamounts from the portfolio to meet pension liabilities. SMERF staff will prepare a schele of withawals the beginning of eafiscyear. The portfolio manager must manage liquity so to sburse fun in accornwith the withawschele.In view of these restrictions, scuss whether Miest NationBank cjustify inclung the SMERF portfolio in the composite. The GIPS stanr prohibit inclung non-scretionary portfolios in composites. IPS restrictions not necessarily renr a portfolio non-scretionary. It is up to the investment management firm to fine scretion anto termine whether it hthe scretion to implement the investment strategy, given the restrictions of the IPS. In this case, however, it appears likely thSMERF’s polirequiring transactions to approvein aanthe Investment Committee anthe pension plan’s liquity nee prevent Miest NationBank from fully implementing the investment objective of achieving long-term capitappreciation through active management. If so, Miest NationBank must classify the SMERF portfolio non-scretionary anexclu it from all composites. GIPS 标准禁止在组合中包含非全权委托投资组合。 IPS 限制并不一定会使投资组合成为非全权委托。鉴于 IPS 的限制,由投资管理公司定义自由裁量权并确定其是否具有实施投资策略的自由裁量权。然而,在这种情况下,SMERF 要求交易事先获得投资委员会批准的政策以及养老金计划的流动性需求似乎阻碍了中西部国家银行全面实施通过积极管理实现长期资本增值的投资目标。如果是这样,中西部国家银行必须将 SMERF 投资组合归类为非全权委托,并将其从所有composites中排除。 老师这个题理解,对于这个case中的“SMERF staff will prepare a schele of withawals the beginning of eafiscyear.”这句话,想问下是否符合GIPS中的fix commitment的要求,进而用Money-weightereturn?

2025-02-04 17:53 1 · 回答