开发者:上海品职教育科技有限公司 隐私政策详情

应用版本:4.2.11(IOS)|3.2.5(安卓)APP下载

186****7232 · 2025年05月06日

NO.2024021802000073

其它问题 A选项:包括非财务重要性的因子。 是不是也是正确选项?A选项的解析没有说清楚。
1 个答案

净净_品职助教 · 2025年05月06日

嗨,从没放弃的小努力你好:


题干:当使用标准化框架评估重要性时,分析师最有可能:

A选项是错误的,重大性分析就是要识别出对财务有重大影响的因子,A选项说的是包括对财务没有重大影响的因素肯定是错误的。

----------------------------------------------
努力的时光都是限量版,加油!

  • 1

    回答
  • 0

    关注
  • 6

    浏览
相关问题

NO.PZ2024021802000073 问题如下 When using stanrzeframeworks to assess materiality, analysts are most likely to: A.inclu factors thare not financially material. B.stop using proprietary materiality assessments. C.consir fferent ESG factors for companies in the same sector. Incorrebecause materiality is typically measurein terms of both the likelihooanmagnitu of impact. Many practitioners focus exclusively on materiESG factors. termining whiESG issues are most materiinvolves jument anis not exascience. Frameworks suthe materiality maps proviSASB (now part of the ISSprovi guince, but investment professionals often velop their own view on whis most material.Incorrebecause various stakeholrs not agree on how to fine or report materiality, so veloping proprietary materiality assessments alongsi stanrzeframeworks continues to important competenfor investors.Correbecause materiESG factors ffer companies in fferent sub-sectors of the same sector. Companies in the same sector might jueto have fferent materiESG factors. For instance, in the health care instry, a mecinsurer will have fferent materifactors tha pharmaceuticcompany. Aneven in the same instry, invicompanies chave fferent materifactors. b和c都对那为什么正确答案是C呢

2025-03-19 18:05 1 · 回答

NO.PZ2024021802000073问题如下When using stanrzeframeworks to assess materiality, analysts are most likely to:A.inclu factors thare not financially material.B.stop using proprietary materiality assessments.C.consir fferent ESG factors for companies in the same sector. Incorrebecause materiality is typically measurein terms of both the likelihooanmagnitu of impact. Many practitioners focus exclusively on materiESG factors. termining whiESG issues are most materiinvolves jument anis not exascience. Frameworks suthe materiality maps proviSASB (now part of the ISSprovi guince, but investment professionals often velop their own view on whis most material.Incorrebecause various stakeholrs not agree on how to fine or report materiality, so veloping proprietary materiality assessments alongsi stanrzeframeworks continues to important competenfor investors.Correbecause materiESG factors ffer companies in fferent sub-sectors of the same sector. Companies in the same sector might jueto have fferent materiESG factors. For instance, in the health care instry, a mecinsurer will have fferent materifactors tha pharmaceuticcompany. Aneven in the same instry, invicompanies chave fferent materifactors. c,当使用了标准化框架以后,每个行业的实质性评估不就一样了吗

2025-03-07 22:59 1 · 回答

NO.PZ2024021802000073问题如下When using stanrzeframeworks to assess materiality, analysts are most likely to:A.inclu factors thare not financially material.B.stop using proprietary materiality assessments.C.consir fferent ESG factors for companies in the same sector. Incorrebecause materiality is typically measurein terms of both the likelihooanmagnitu of impact. Many practitioners focus exclusively on materiESG factors. termining whiESG issues are most materiinvolves jument anis not exascience. Frameworks suthe materiality maps proviSASB (now part of the ISSprovi guince, but investment professionals often velop their own view on whis most material.Incorrebecause various stakeholrs not agree on how to fine or report materiality, so veloping proprietary materiality assessments alongsi stanrzeframeworks continues to important competenfor investors.Correbecause materiESG factors ffer companies in fferent sub-sectors of the same sector. Companies in the same sector might jueto have fferent materiESG factors. For instance, in the health care instry, a mecinsurer will have fferent materifactors tha pharmaceuticcompany. Aneven in the same instry, invicompanies chave fferent materifactors. 请问知识点在哪里🤔呢

2024-10-20 20:46 1 · 回答

NO.PZ2024021802000073 问题如下 When using stanrzeframeworks to assess materiality, analysts are most likely to: A.inclu factors thare not financially material. B.stop using proprietary materiality assessments. C.consir fferent ESG factors for companies in the same sector. Incorrebecause materiality is typically measurein terms of both the likelihooanmagnitu of impact. Many practitioners focus exclusively on materiESG factors. termining whiESG issues are most materiinvolves jument anis not exascience. Frameworks suthe materiality maps proviSASB (now part of the ISSprovi guince, but investment professionals often velop their own view on whis most material.Incorrebecause various stakeholrs not agree on how to fine or report materiality, so veloping proprietary materiality assessments alongsi stanrzeframeworks continues to important competenfor investors.Correbecause materiESG factors ffer companies in fferent sub-sectors of the same sector. Companies in the same sector might jueto have fferent materiESG factors. For instance, in the health care instry, a mecinsurer will have fferent materifactors tha pharmaceuticcompany. Aneven in the same instry, invicompanies chave fferent materifactors. A为什么不对?

2024-06-20 18:52 2 · 回答