开发者:上海品职教育科技有限公司 隐私政策详情

应用版本:4.2.11(IOS)|3.2.5(安卓)APP下载

姜哈哈 · 2025年04月09日

why high carbon intensity leads to lower value of corporate debt

NO.PZ2024021802000093

问题如下:

A steel-producing company reports higher carbon intensity compared to its peers. An analyst is most likely to:

选项:

A.increase the value of company's corporate debt. B.increase the cost of debt for the company's new project financing. C.assign a higher fair value price-to-earnings (P/E) ratio to the company.

解释:

A. Incorrect because high carbon intensity (proved by scope 1 and 2 carbon intensity being both absolute and relative to sector) leads to lower value of corporate debt.

B. Correct because high carbon intensity (proved by scope 1 and 2 carbon intensity being both absolute and relative to sector) leads to increased cost of debt for new project financing.

C. Incorrect because weak ESG performance leads to lowering the price-to-earnings ratio compared to peers. For example, an investor might assign a “fair value P/E” of 16x to a strong ESG company versus 14x for an average ESG company and 12x for a weak ESG company.

您好,

high carbon intensity leads to lower value of corporate debt,为什么不是高碳强度会导致低评分进而产生高风险从而升高负担成本吗?

1 个答案

净净_品职助教 · 2025年04月09日

嗨,爱思考的PZer你好:


同学所说的“升高负担成本”指的是提高cost of debt的吗?高碳强度的表现必定是提高公司风险,那么这个公司不管是股票还是债务风险都会增高,cost of debt的确会增加,这样进一步导致debt的价值降低,A选项说反了。

----------------------------------------------
就算太阳没有迎着我们而来,我们正在朝着它而去,加油!

  • 1

    回答
  • 0

    关注
  • 4

    浏览
相关问题

NO.PZ2024021802000093问题如下A steel-procing company reports higher carbon intensity compareto its peers. analyst is most likely to:A.increase the value of company's corporate bt.B.increase the cost of for the company's new projefinancing.C.assign a higher fair value price-to-earnings (P/E) ratio to the company. Incorrebecause high carbon intensity (provescope 1 an2 carbon intensity being both absolute anrelative to sector) lea to lower value of corporate bt.Correbecause high carbon intensity (provescope 1 an2 carbon intensity being both absolute anrelative to sector) lea to increasecost of for new projefinancing.Incorrebecause weESG performanlea to lowering the price-to-earnings ratio compareto peers. For example, investor might assign a “fair value P/E” of 16x to a strong ESG company versus 14x for average ESG company an12x for a weESG company. 老师,为什么bt应该下降,cost of bt要上升?

2024-06-04 18:55 1 · 回答

NO.PZ2024021802000093问题如下 A steel-procing company reports higher carbon intensity compareto its peers. analyst is most likely to:A.increase the value of company's corporate bt.B.increase the cost of for the company's new projefinancing.C.assign a higher fair value price-to-earnings (P/E) ratio to the company. Incorrebecause high carbon intensity (provescope 1 an2 carbon intensity being both absolute anrelative to sector) lea to lower value of corporate bt.Correbecause high carbon intensity (provescope 1 an2 carbon intensity being both absolute anrelative to sector) lea to increasecost of for new projefinancing.Incorrebecause weESG performanlea to lowering the price-to-earnings ratio compareto peers. For example, investor might assign a “fair value P/E” of 16x to a strong ESG company versus 14x for average ESG company an12x for a weESG company. 不明白為什麼C是錯誤?

2024-04-08 09:06 1 · 回答