开发者:上海品职教育科技有限公司 隐私政策详情

应用版本:4.2.11(IOS)|3.2.5(安卓)APP下载

梦梦 · 2025年04月08日

为什么B对!私募股权基金的收益该被高估吧

NO.PZ2019042401000075

问题如下:

An individual investor wants to invest USD 8 million in exchange-traded funds (ETFs) or private equity funds (PEFs). The investor obtains the previous year’s returns for several ETFs and calculates summary statistics such as volatility and correlation based on these returns. The investor also reviews a database of reported returns and volatilities for several PEFs and then selects two potential investments in each asset class. Using the data from the sources described above, the investor generates the following information for the four potential investments:


The manager evaluates this information while also considering the potential biases and uncertainties in the reported data. Which of the following conclusions is most appropriate for the investor to make?

选项:

A.

The correlation of returns between PEF1 and ETF1 is more accurate than the correlation of returns between ETF1 and ETF2.

B.

Summary statistics computed using reported returns of PEFs can be biased downward, which compromises the reliability of these risk measures.

C.

The number of assets in PEFs are typically higher than the number of assets in ETFs, which makes PEFs much less risky than ETFs over longer time horizons.

D.

The entire USD 8 million should be allocated to PEF2 because it is clearly the superior investment from a return to risk perspective.

解释:

B is correct. Because private equity funds trade infrequently, their risk measures— such as volatilities, correlations, and betas—can be too low when computed using reported returns. See p. 386 in LTR and p.86 in IM

A is incorrect. Correlations regarding PEF1 are not reliable (See explanation for D). The correlation between the two ETFs is more reliable.

C is incorrect. The number of assets alone cannot be a determinant of the risk level of a portfolio. Also, ETFs often hold a very large number of assets, while PEFs can be more concentrated.

D is incorrect. Because the volatility of PEF2 is likely understated, it is not clear that PEF2 truly has the best return to risk profile out of the four investments. Even if it did in fact have the best return/risk profile, it is inappropriate to conclude that the investor should allocate all these funds to that one investment. The investor should consider other factors, such as potential diversification benefits from holding a mixture of the four investments as well as diversification benefits with other investments and asset classes that the investor may own. There is not enough information given to make this conclusion.

老师,B选项“B选项说利用私募基金对外公布的数据算出来的统计指标,会有低估的情况,从而影响其可靠性。这个是对的。私募基金的交易频率较低,从极为有限的少量数据算出来的波动率、相关性大概率是偏低的。”私募基金因为没数据,应该是高估收益率啊,因为很多赔光的,亏损的都没披露。

1 个答案

李坏_品职助教 · 2025年04月08日

嗨,努力学习的PZer你好:


这说的不是低估收益率,他说的低估了风险指标,比如β或者σ,私募基金的交易不是很频繁,缺乏足够的数据,当你用他仅有的少量的收益率数据计算volatilities, correlations, and betas的时候,这几个风险指标会被低估。

----------------------------------------------
就算太阳没有迎着我们而来,我们正在朝着它而去,加油!

  • 1

    回答
  • 0

    关注
  • 3

    浏览
相关问题

NO.PZ2019042401000075问题如下 inviinvestor wants to invest US8 million in exchange-trafun (ETFs) or private equity fun (PEFs). The investor obtains the previous year’s returns for severETFs ancalculates summary statistisuvolatility ancorrelation baseon these returns. The investor also reviews a tabase of reportereturns anvolatilities for severPEFs anthen selects two potentiinvestments in eaasset class. Using the ta from the sources scribeabove, the investor generates the following information for the four potentiinvestments:The manager evaluates this information while also consiring the potentibiases anuncertainties in the reportetWhiof the following conclusions is most appropriate for the investor to make? A.The correlation of returns between PEF1 anETF1 is more accurate ththe correlation of returns between ETF1 anETF2.B.Summary statisticomputeusing reportereturns of PEFs cbiasewnwar whicompromises the reliability of these risk measures.C.The number of assets in PEFs are typically higher ththe number of assets in ETFs, whimakes PEFs muless risky thETFs over longer time horizons.The entire US8 million shoulallocateto PEF2 because it is clearly the superior investment from a return to risk perspective. B is correct. Because private equity fun tra infrequently, their risk measures— suvolatilities, correlations, anbetas—ctoo low when computeusing reportereturns. See p. 386 in LTR anp.86 in IMA is incorrect. Correlations regarng PEF1 are not reliable (See explanation for . The correlation between the two ETFs is more reliable. C is incorrect. The number of assets alone cannot a terminant of the risk level of a portfolio. Also, ETFs often hola very large number of assets, while PEFs cmore concentrateis incorrect. Because the volatility of PEF2 is likely unrstate it is not clethPEF2 truly hthe best return to risk profile out of the four investments. Even if it in fahave the best return/risk profile, it is inappropriate to conclu ththe investor shoulallocate all these fun to thone investment. The investor shoulconsir other factors, supotentiversification benefits from holng a mixture of the four investments well versification benefits with other investments anasset classes ththe investor mown. There is not enough information given to make this conclusion. 这道题考点是什么,怎么分析的,请详细一些

2025-03-11 16:21 1 · 回答

NO.PZ2019042401000075 问题如下 inviinvestor wants to invest US8 million in exchange-trafun (ETFs) or private equity fun (PEFs). The investor obtains the previous year’s returns for severETFs ancalculates summary statistisuvolatility ancorrelation baseon these returns. The investor also reviews a tabase of reportereturns anvolatilities for severPEFs anthen selects two potentiinvestments in eaasset class. Using the ta from the sources scribeabove, the investor generates the following information for the four potentiinvestments:The manager evaluates this information while also consiring the potentibiases anuncertainties in the reportetWhiof the following conclusions is most appropriate for the investor to make? A.The correlation of returns between PEF1 anETF1 is more accurate ththe correlation of returns between ETF1 anETF2. B.Summary statisticomputeusing reportereturns of PEFs cbiasewnwar whicompromises the reliability of these risk measures. C.The number of assets in PEFs are typically higher ththe number of assets in ETFs, whimakes PEFs muless risky thETFs over longer time horizons. The entire US8 million shoulallocateto PEF2 because it is clearly the superior investment from a return to risk perspective. B is correct. Because private equity fun tra infrequently, their risk measures— suvolatilities, correlations, anbetas—ctoo low when computeusing reportereturns. See p. 386 in LTR anp.86 in IMA is incorrect. Correlations regarng PEF1 are not reliable (See explanation for . The correlation between the two ETFs is more reliable. C is incorrect. The number of assets alone cannot a terminant of the risk level of a portfolio. Also, ETFs often hola very large number of assets, while PEFs cmore concentrateis incorrect. Because the volatility of PEF2 is likely unrstate it is not clethPEF2 truly hthe best return to risk profile out of the four investments. Even if it in fahave the best return/risk profile, it is inappropriate to conclu ththe investor shoulallocate all these fun to thone investment. The investor shoulconsir other factors, supotentiversification benefits from holng a mixture of the four investments well versification benefits with other investments anasset classes ththe investor mown. There is not enough information given to make this conclusion. 如题,因为数据偏差,不是会导致return 有偏差,会被高估吗

2024-11-11 09:30 1 · 回答

NO.PZ2019042401000075问题如下 inviinvestor wants to invest US8 million in exchange-trafun (ETFs) or private equity fun (PEFs). The investor obtains the previous year’s returns for severETFs ancalculates summary statistisuvolatility ancorrelation baseon these returns. The investor also reviews a tabase of reportereturns anvolatilities for severPEFs anthen selects two potentiinvestments in eaasset class. Using the ta from the sources scribeabove, the investor generates the following information for the four potentiinvestments:The manager evaluates this information while also consiring the potentibiases anuncertainties in the reportetWhiof the following conclusions is most appropriate for the investor to make? A.The correlation of returns between PEF1 anETF1 is more accurate ththe correlation of returns between ETF1 anETF2.B.Summary statisticomputeusing reportereturns of PEFs cbiasewnwar whicompromises the reliability of these risk measures.C.The number of assets in PEFs are typically higher ththe number of assets in ETFs, whimakes PEFs muless risky thETFs over longer time horizons.The entire US8 million shoulallocateto PEF2 because it is clearly the superior investment from a return to risk perspective. B is correct. Because private equity fun tra infrequently, their risk measures— suvolatilities, correlations, anbetas—ctoo low when computeusing reportereturns. See p. 386 in LTR anp.86 in IMA is incorrect. Correlations regarng PEF1 are not reliable (See explanation for . The correlation between the two ETFs is more reliable. C is incorrect. The number of assets alone cannot a terminant of the risk level of a portfolio. Also, ETFs often hola very large number of assets, while PEFs cmore concentrateis incorrect. Because the volatility of PEF2 is likely unrstate it is not clethPEF2 truly hthe best return to risk profile out of the four investments. Even if it in fahave the best return/risk profile, it is inappropriate to conclu ththe investor shoulallocate all these fun to thone investment. The investor shoulconsir other factors, supotentiversification benefits from holng a mixture of the four investments well versification benefits with other investments anasset classes ththe investor mown. There is not enough information given to make this conclusion. 题干中描述的是return会被wnwar计,但说的是risk被wnwar驴唇不对马嘴,不应该是return upwarrisk wnwar?

2024-04-05 07:50 1 · 回答

NO.PZ2019042401000075 问题如下 inviinvestor wants to invest US8 million in exchange-trafun (ETFs) or private equity fun (PEFs). The investor obtains the previous year’s returns for severETFs ancalculates summary statistisuvolatility ancorrelation baseon these returns. The investor also reviews a tabase of reportereturns anvolatilities for severPEFs anthen selects two potentiinvestments in eaasset class. Using the ta from the sources scribeabove, the investor generates the following information for the four potentiinvestments:The manager evaluates this information while also consiring the potentibiases anuncertainties in the reportetWhiof the following conclusions is most appropriate for the investor to make? A.The correlation of returns between PEF1 anETF1 is more accurate ththe correlation of returns between ETF1 anETF2. B.Summary statisticomputeusing reportereturns of PEFs cbiasewnwar whicompromises the reliability of these risk measures. C.The number of assets in PEFs are typically higher ththe number of assets in ETFs, whimakes PEFs muless risky thETFs over longer time horizons. The entire US8 million shoulallocateto PEF2 because it is clearly the superior investment from a return to risk perspective. B is correct. Because private equity fun tra infrequently, their risk measures— suvolatilities, correlations, anbetas—ctoo low when computeusing reportereturns. See p. 386 in LTR anp.86 in IMA is incorrect. Correlations regarng PEF1 are not reliable (See explanation for . The correlation between the two ETFs is more reliable. C is incorrect. The number of assets alone cannot a terminant of the risk level of a portfolio. Also, ETFs often hola very large number of assets, while PEFs cmore concentrateis incorrect. Because the volatility of PEF2 is likely unrstate it is not clethPEF2 truly hthe best return to risk profile out of the four investments. Even if it in fahave the best return/risk profile, it is inappropriate to conclu ththe investor shoulallocate all these fun to thone investment. The investor shoulconsir other factors, supotentiversification benefits from holng a mixture of the four investments well versification benefits with other investments anasset classes ththe investor mown. There is not enough information given to make this conclusion. 如题

2024-03-19 17:27 1 · 回答