开发者:上海品职教育科技有限公司 隐私政策详情

应用版本:4.2.11(IOS)|3.2.5(安卓)APP下载

51Jun · 2025年03月13日

讲义里说fixed-income更注重balance sheet strength吗,这里是问bond,为什么A是对的

NO.PZ2024021802000056

问题如下:

Compared to equity investors, bond investors are more likely to monitor ESG issues that could impact:

选项:

A.balance sheet strength.

B.future growth opportunities.

C.cost reduction opportunities.

解释:

A. Correct because bond investors may find ESG factors that impact balance sheet strength (and hence, the risks of debt defaults) more material than equity investors who might be concerned more about future growth opportunities.

请解答,最好补充解释下固定收益和债券的区别

0 个答案
  • 0

    回答
  • 0

    关注
  • 1

    浏览
相关问题

NO.PZ2024021802000056问题如下Compareto equity investors, boninvestors are more likely to monitor ESG issues thcoulimpact:A.balansheet strength.B.future growth opportunities.C.cost rection opportunities. Correbecause boninvestors mfinESG factors thimpabalansheet strength (anhence, the risks of faults) more materithequity investors who might concernemore about future growth opportunities. 虽然这题我选对了,也知道B是equity investor考虑的因素,想问下Ccost rection如何理解?是哪种投资者会考虑到的呢?为什么?

2024-11-16 19:04 1 · 回答

NO.PZ2024021802000056 问题如下 Compareto equity investors, boninvestors are more likely to monitor ESG issues thcoulimpact: A.balansheet strength. B.future growth opportunities. C.cost rection opportunities. Correbecause boninvestors mfinESG factors thimpabalansheet strength (anhence, the risks of faults) more materithequity investors who might concernemore about future growth opportunities. 为什么不选B

2024-08-12 23:16 1 · 回答

NO.PZ2024021802000056问题如下 Compareto equity investors, boninvestors are more likely to monitor ESG issues thcoulimpact:A.balansheet strength.B.future growth opportunities.C.cost rection opportunities. Correbecause boninvestors mfinESG factors thimpabalansheet strength (anhence, the risks of faults) more materithequity investors who might concernemore about future growth opportunities. 可以解釋一下equlity investors 和boninvestors 的分別嗎?

2024-04-10 08:43 1 · 回答