开发者:上海品职教育科技有限公司 隐私政策详情

应用版本:4.2.11(IOS)|3.2.5(安卓)APP下载

超超 · 2025年01月26日

为什么选这个

* 问题详情,请 查看题干

NO.PZ202312260100001403

问题如下:

TOPIC: PORTFOLIO MANAGEMENT – ASSET ALLOCATION

TOTAL POINT VALUE OF THIS QUESTION SET IS 12 POINTS

Suzanne Nichols is a portfolio manager at Starlight Investment Advisers, a firm that focuses on wealth management for institutional and high-net-worth clients. Mark Lopez has recently joined Nichols’ team as a junior analyst.

Lopez has been using the mean–variance optimization (MVO) framework to analyze strategic asset allocation decisions in his client portfolios. Nichols is concerned that forward-looking inputs that are used in the framework are inherently subject to estimation errors. Nichols would like to enhance the MVO framework with the addition of Monte Carlo simulation and suggests a modified allocation technique.

Lopez has recently been reading about risk budgeting and asks Nichols to explain some of the confusing points. As a part of her explanation, Nichols makes the following statements:

Statement 1: The goal of risk budgeting is to minimize absolute risk.

Statement 2: The absolute contribution to total risk (ACTR) for an asset class measures how much it contributes to portfolio return volatility.

Statement 3: The marginal contribution to total risk (MCTR) identifies the rate at which risk would change with a small change in the asset allocation weights.

Lopez next inquires about the characteristics of different liability-relative asset allocation approaches. He is specifically interested in a multi-period model suitable for investors whose primary goal is safeguarding their surplus rather than increasing their assets. Consequently, he seeks Nichols’ expert recommendation.

Lopez also wants to understand Nichols’ view on the role of rebalancing policy within strategic asset allocation. Specifically, he asks Nichols to identify which among the following factors:

Factor 1: Transaction costs

Factor 2: Correlation with the rest of the portfolio

Factor 3: Volatility with the rest of the portfolio


The liability-relative asset allocation approach that would be most appropriate for Nichols to recommend is:

选项:

A.surplus optimization. B.hedging/return-seeking portfolios. C.integrated asset–liability portfolios.

解释:

All of the three listed liability-relative approaches are appropriate for conservative investors (investors who are more interested in protecting the surplus than growing their assets). However, integrated asset–liability portfolios are the only listed approach that can handle multiple periods.

investors who are more interested in protecting the surplus than growing their assets

老师,能否解释一下这三个选项,为什么选择了最后一个呀。做了几次都错了

1 个答案

Lucky_品职助教 · 2025年01月26日

嗨,从没放弃的小努力你好:


同学你好:


A 选项surplus optimization侧重于对资产和负债之间的盈余进行优化配置,其目的是通过合理安排资产,使资产价值超过负债价值的部分达到最优状态,以保障或增加盈余。但这种方法通常适用于单期的分析和决策,它主要聚焦在当前的资产和负债状况,难以全面考虑多期的变化情况。

B 选项hedging/return-seeking portfolios是为了在控制风险的同时追求一定的投资回报。通过运用对冲策略来降低特定风险,同时配置一些具有增值潜力的资产以获取收益。然而,它同样主要关注的是短期或有限期内的风险与回报平衡,在处理多期的资产负债关系方面存在局限性。它不能很好地适应投资者在多期内资产和负债不断变化的情况,难以持续保障盈余。

C 选项integrated asset–liability portfolios,这种方法能够全面综合地考虑资产和负债在多个时期的变化情况。它将资产配置与负债管理紧密结合,根据不同时期的负债特征、市场环境等因素动态调整资产组合。例如,随着时间推移,当负债规模、期限结构发生变化,或者市场利率、资产价格波动时,综合资产 - 负债投资组合可以及时调整资产配置,确保资产能够持续满足负债需求,有效保护盈余。在多期的情况下,它能为投资者提供更全面、更灵活的解决方案,所以是最适合题目中投资者的方法。

----------------------------------------------
努力的时光都是限量版,加油!