开发者:上海品职教育科技有限公司 隐私政策详情

应用版本:4.2.11(IOS)|3.2.5(安卓)APP下载

KKII · 2025年01月12日

知道A公司的重大非公开信息,然后交易同行业的B公司

* 问题详情,请 查看题干

NO.PZ201604030300004606

问题如下:

6. When shorting Tefla stock, does Garcia violate any CFA Institute Standards?

选项:

A.

No.

B.

Yes, because he does not have a reasonable basis for the trade.

C.

Yes, because he is in possession of material nonpublic information.

解释:

C is correct.

Garcia is in possession of material nonpublic information and acted on it in violation of Standard II(A). After the analyst’s recommendation has been issued and/or distributed publicly, Garcia would be free to make the trade. Because this is a personal purchase, the standard relating to diligence and reasonable basis is not applicable.

1、知道A公司的重大非公开信息,然后交易同行业的B公司,这个到底算不算违法II(A)material nonpublic information



2、另外重大非公开信息指的是这个信息本身,还是说相对于投资决策:即对于投资A公司,这个算重大非公开信息,那么对于投资B公司,这个算不算重大非公开信息呢?

1 个答案

王暄_品职助教 · 2025年01月12日

1、知道A公司的重大非公开信息,然后交易同行业的B公司,这确实可能违反II(A) Material Nonpublic Information标准。即使交易的是B公司,但如果交易决策是基于A公司的非公开信息,且该信息对B公司的股价有潜在影响,那么这种交易行为就可能被视为利用了内幕信息。

2、重大非公开信息指的是那些尚未公开且对股价有重大影响的信息。对于投资A公司而言,如果某信息是A公司的重大非公开信息,那么对于投资与A公司同行业或业务相关的B公司,该信息也可能被视为重大非公开信息,尤其是当该信息可能影响整个行业或市场时。因此,在决定是否交易B公司时,也需要考虑这一点。


  • 1

    回答
  • 0

    关注
  • 3

    浏览
相关问题

NO.PZ201604030300004606 问题如下 6. When shorting Tefla stock, es Garcia violate any CFA Institute Stanr? A.No. B.Yes, because he es not have a reasonable basis for the tra. C.Yes, because he is in possession of materinonpublic information. C is correct.Garcia is in possession of materinonpublic information anacteon it in violation of StanrII(A). After the analyst’s recommention hbeen issueanor stributepublicly, Garcia woulfree to make the tra. Because this is a personpurchase, the stanrrelating to ligenanreasonable basis is not applicable. 老师,请问这个case有完整的讲解视频嘛?

2025-01-06 23:46 1 · 回答

NO.PZ201604030300004606 问题如下 6. When shorting Tefla stock, es Garcia violate any CFA Institute Stanr? A.No. B.Yes, because he es not have a reasonable basis for the tra. C.Yes, because he is in possession of materinonpublic information. C is correct.Garcia is in possession of materinonpublic information anacteon it in violation of StanrII(A). After the analyst’s recommention hbeen issueanor stributepublicly, Garcia woulfree to make the tra. Because this is a personpurchase, the stanrrelating to ligenanreasonable basis is not applicable. Garcia一听说要wngra T公司的同类企业,immeately去卖掉了T公司,根本没有足够的时间去思考对同类企业的wngra到底是因为整个行业不景气还是因为那家企业自身的问题,就直接去short T公司了。这难道不是缺乏依据吗?

2023-01-18 19:55 2 · 回答

NO.PZ201604030300004606问题如下 6. When shorting Tefla stock, es Garcia violate any CFA Institute Stanr?A.No.B.Yes, because he es not have a reasonable basis for the tra.C.Yes, because he is in possession of materinonpublic information.C is correct.Garcia is in possession of materinonpublic information anacteon it in violation of StanrII(A). After the analyst’s recommention hbeen issueanor stributepublicly, Garcia woulfree to make the tra. Because this is a personpurchase, the stanrrelating to ligenanreasonable basis is not applicable.上一题说不是用内幕信息交易,那这题不也可以说没够利用内幕信息交易码?他是在用类企业基础上分析而来的

2022-12-21 10:16 1 · 回答

NO.PZ201604030300004606问题如下6. When shorting Tefla stock, es Garcia violate any CFA Institute Stanr?A.No.B.Yes, because he es not have a reasonable basis for the tra.C.Yes, because he is in possession of materinonpublic information.C is correct.Garcia is in possession of materinonpublic information anacteon it in violation of StanrII(A). After the analyst’s recommention hbeen issueanor stributepublicly, Garcia woulfree to make the tra. Because this is a personpurchase, the stanrrelating to ligenanreasonable basis is not applicable.1、这题与上一题有没有联系?这题的信息没有说他偷听分析师,只是说分析师下调之后卖出,没有偷听的意思。有也是上题的内容里说的2、如果算偷听,当然算违反mni,但是c的理由写的是possess,老师强调possess不违反,那c的理由写的也不对

2022-07-27 18:55 1 · 回答