开发者:上海品职教育科技有限公司 隐私政策详情

应用版本:4.2.11(IOS)|3.2.5(安卓)APP下载

baodi · 2018年10月15日

问一道题:NO.PZ2016082405000057

问题如下图:

    

选项:

A.

B.

C.

D.

解释:



问题: 问题问的是哪个因素会导致在多边netting情况下需要更少的CCP, CCP的存在会带来严重的系统性风险,如果要降低严重的系统风险, CCP需要减少

1 个答案

品职答疑小助手雍 · 2018年10月15日

同学你好,这题里fewer的意思不是更少,而是一些。

题目的意思是,多边netting比单边好,哪种好处能体现这世界需要一些CCPs来产生多边netting优势。

hellomay441531 · 2019年04月11日

为什么不选D

品职答疑小助手雍 · 2019年04月12日

同学你好,因为CCP并没有减小系统性风险,而是把违约风险转换成了流动性风险,所以解析里第五行用的是mitigate而不是eliminate。所以整体的系统性风险并没有reduce。

  • 1

    回答
  • 0

    关注
  • 373

    浏览
相关问题

The benefits of multilaternetting versus bilaternetting are pennt on a number of factors. Whiof the following factors most strongly suggest the neefor fewer centrcounterparties (CCPs) in a globmultilaternetting framework? Rection of risk exposures. fferences in liquity for asset classes. Jurisctionfragmentation. Rection in severe systemic risk. A One of the biggest benefits of multilaternetting is the rection of risk exposures. With fewer CCPs a greater gree of risk rection is realizee to lower penncies within anacross rivative procts. This risk rection helps mitigate systemic risk. fferences in asset classes relateto liquity woulsuggest more CCPs are neeto concentrate in specific asset classes. Jurisctionfragmentation in a globmarket requires locclearing anthus more CCPs. A monopolistic framework with only a few CCPs coulleto severe systemic risk, in the event thmargins ancollaterare not sufficient to cover losses. 这里的B是什么意思,没看懂

2020-08-16 17:44 1 · 回答

fferences in liquity for asset classes. Jurisctionfragmentation. Rection in severe systemic risk. A One of the biggest benefits of multilaternetting is the rection of risk exposures. With fewer CCPs a greater gree of risk rection is realizee to lower penncies within anacross rivative procts. This risk rection helps mitigate systemic risk. fferences in asset classes relateto liquity woulsuggest more CCPs are neeto concentrate in specific asset classes. Jurisctionfragmentation in a globmarket requires locclearing anthus more CCPs. A monopolistic framework with only a few CCPs coulleto severe systemic risk, in the event thmargins ancollaterare not sufficient to cover losses. 关于如果很多的ccp引起恶性竞争,不是更容易引发系统性风险吗?所以,应该是倾向于更少的CCP吧。

2020-06-01 15:03 1 · 回答

The benefits of multilaternetting versus bilaternetting are pennt on a number of factors. Whiof the following factors most strongly suggest the neefor fewer centrcounterparties (CCPs) in a globmultilaternetting framework? Rection of risk exposures. fferences in liquity for asset classes. Jurisctionfragmentation. Rection in severe systemic risk. A One of the biggest benefits of multilaternetting is the rection of risk exposures. With fewer CCPs a greater gree of risk rection is realizee to lower penncies within anacross rivative procts. This risk rection helps mitigate systemic risk. fferences in asset classes relateto liquity woulsuggest more CCPs are neeto concentrate in specific asset classes. Jurisctionfragmentation in a globmarket requires locclearing anthus more CCPs. A monopolistic framework with only a few CCPs coulleto severe systemic risk, in the event thmargins ancollaterare not sufficient to cover losses. fewer 讲道理是表示更少的意思吧,这不完全相反了吗?

2020-04-12 21:14 2 · 回答

fferences in liquity for asset classes. Jurisctionfragmentation. Rection in severe systemic risk. A One of the biggest benefits of multilaternetting is the rection of risk exposures. With fewer CCPs a greater gree of risk rection is realizee to lower penncies within anacross rivative procts. This risk rection helps mitigate systemic risk. fferences in asset classes relateto liquity woulsuggest more CCPs are neeto concentrate in specific asset classes. Jurisctionfragmentation in a globmarket requires locclearing anthus more CCPs. A monopolistic framework with only a few CCPs coulleto severe systemic risk, in the event thmargins ancollaterare not sufficient to cover losses. 请问A,fewer C带来的lower penncies within anacross rivative procts 如何理解呢

2020-03-31 19:28 1 · 回答

The benefits of multilaternetting versus bilaternetting are pennt on a number of factors. Whiof the following factors most strongly suggest the neefor fewer centrcounterparties (CCPs) in a globmultilaternetting framework? Rection of risk exposures. fferences in liquity for asset classes. Jurisctionfragmentation. Rection in severe systemic risk. A One of the biggest benefits of multilaternetting is the rection of risk exposures. With fewer CCPs a greater gree of risk rection is realizee to lower penncies within anacross rivative procts. This risk rection helps mitigate systemic risk. fferences in asset classes relateto liquity woulsuggest more CCPs are neeto concentrate in specific asset classes. Jurisctionfragmentation in a globmarket requires locclearing anthus more CCPs. A monopolistic framework with only a few CCPs coulleto severe systemic risk, in the event thmargins ancollaterare not sufficient to cover losses. 请问C是什么意思?

2020-03-17 23:17 1 · 回答