开发者:上海品职教育科技有限公司 隐私政策详情

应用版本:4.2.11(IOS)|3.2.5(安卓)APP下载

Ellen li · 2024年11月11日

C为什么不对

NO.PZ2024021802000004

问题如下:

Describing ESG performance attribution at a portfolio level is difficult because:

选项:

A.there is a lack of third-party data providers.

B.there is a size bias in ESG ratings in favor of large companies.

C.many third-party data providers describe ESG attributes as an uncorrelated, statistically independent factor.

解释:

A. Incorrect because third-party data providers are developing increasingly sophisticated ESG ratings and scoring methodologies.

B. Correct because the ratings from many providers reveal a significant, underlying correlation with existing factors, such as value, quality, size, and momentum. In addition, there is a size bias in ESG ratings in favor of large companies because large companies have the resources to disclose information and create ESG management policies.

C. Incorrect because third-party data providers are developing increasingly sophisticated ESG ratings and scoring methodologies, but many fall short in describing ESG attributes as an uncorrelated, statistically independent factor. In fact, the ratings from many providers reveal a significant, underlying correlation with existing factors.

数据不准确也会导致组合层面的问题啊

1 个答案

Tina_品职助教 · 2024年11月12日

嗨,爱思考的PZer你好:


目前虽然第三方数据提供商正在开发越来越复杂的ESG(环境、社会和治理)评级和评分方法,但许多方法都没有能很好的描述“ESG属性”可以作为组合归因中的一个独立的因子出现的,也就是说ESG的因子不能完全独立于比如动量因子,或是市场因子等等。

所以这里C选项说 “第三方数据可以提供将ESG因子描述为一种独立、不相关因子”的这种说法是错误的。

这里不是指数据不准确的问题~


----------------------------------------------
加油吧,让我们一起遇见更好的自己!

  • 1

    回答
  • 0

    关注
  • 18

    浏览
相关问题

NO.PZ2024021802000004问题如下scribing ESG performanattribution a portfolio level is fficult because:A.there is a laof thirparty ta provirs.B.there is a size biin ESG ratings in favor of large companies.C.many thirparty ta provirs scriESG attributes uncorrelate statistically inpennt factor. Incorrebecause thirparty ta provirs are veloping increasingly sophisticateESG ratings anscoring methologies.Correbecause the ratings from many provirs revea significant, unrlying correlation with existing factors, suvalue, quality, size, anmomentum. In aition, there is a size biin ESG ratings in favor of large companies because large companies have the resources to sclose information ancreate ESG management policies.Incorrebecause thirparty ta provirs are veloping increasingly sophisticateESG ratings anscoring methologies, but many fall short in scribing ESG attributes uncorrelate statistically inpennt factor. In fact, the ratings from many provirs revea significant, unrlying correlation with existing factors. 这题不理解,请说明下

2024-05-26 19:22 1 · 回答

NO.PZ2024021802000004 问题如下 scribing ESG performanattribution a portfolio level is fficult because: A.there is a laof thirparty ta provirs. B.there is a size biin ESG ratings in favor of large companies. C.many thirparty ta provirs scriESG attributes uncorrelate statistically inpennt factor. Incorrebecause thirparty ta provirs are veloping increasingly sophisticateESG ratings anscoring methologies.Correbecause the ratings from many provirs revea significant, unrlying correlation with existing factors, suvalue, quality, size, anmomentum. In aition, there is a size biin ESG ratings in favor of large companies because large companies have the resources to sclose information ancreate ESG management policies.Incorrebecause thirparty ta provirs are veloping increasingly sophisticateESG ratings anscoring methologies, but many fall short in scribing ESG attributes uncorrelate statistically inpennt factor. In fact, the ratings from many provirs revea significant, unrlying correlation with existing factors. 只提到公司的size factor有偏差,不是太单一了么

2024-03-31 10:21 1 · 回答