开发者:上海品职教育科技有限公司 隐私政策详情

应用版本:4.2.11(IOS)|3.2.5(安卓)APP下载

wukefu · 2024年10月29日

名义还是实际的GDP

NO.PZ2020012201000007

问题如下:

Alena,CFA, was updating her firm’s projections for US equity returns.If she believed that in the long run that the US labor input would grow by 0.9% perannum and labor productivity by 1.5%, that inflation would be 2.1%, that the dividend yield would be 2.25%, and that there would be no further growth in P/E, what is likely to have been her baseline projection for continuously compounded long-term US equity returns?

选项:

A.

6.75%

B.

5.5%

C.

5.85%

解释:

A is correct

解释:

在长期,一国股票市场的CAPITAL APPRECIATION的增长率等于该国GDP的增长率(本题P/E增长率为0也证实了这一点)。那么本题CAPITAL APPRECIATION就等于计算该国GDP的增长率。此后再加上股息增长率就可以得到股权市场的增长率。

Her baseline projection is likely to have been 6.75% = 0.9% + 1.5% + 2.1% + 2.25%

依照公式可得:. 6.75% = 0.9% + 1.5% + 2.1% + 2.25%

“If she believed that in the long run that the US labor input would grow by 0.9% perannum and labor productivity by 1.5%, that inflation would be 2.1%, ”这句话虽然给了我们inflantion的条件,但是并没有说0.9%+1.5%算出来的就是实际GDP啊?在考试中我们要怎么判断?是不是如给了inflantion的数字,我们就要用上?

1 个答案
已采纳答案

源_品职助教 · 2024年10月29日

嗨,努力学习的PZer你好:


同学是不是想说0.9%+1.5%算出来就是名义GDP

一般考试而言,如果给了inflantion,还是加上。

因为这道题也是协会官方的题目,所以他们的思路还是要加,算名义值。

通常说到宏观经济变量,没有特别提及,都是指实际值。而题目要求的往往又是名义值。

----------------------------------------------
就算太阳没有迎着我们而来,我们正在朝着它而去,加油!

  • 1

    回答
  • 0

    关注
  • 48

    浏览
相关问题

NO.PZ2020012201000007 问题如下 Alena,CFwupting her firm’s projections for US equity returns.If she believethin the long run ththe US labor input woulgrow 0.9% perannum anlabor proctivity 1.5%, thinflation woul2.1%, ththe vinyielwoul2.25%, anththere woulno further growth in P/E, whis likely to have been her baseline projection for continuously compounlong-term US equity returns? 6.75% B.5.5% C.5.85% A is correct在长期,一国股票市场的CAPITAPPRECIATION的增长率等于该国G的增长率(本题P/E增长率为0也证实了这一点)。那么本题CAPITAPPRECIATION就等于计算该国G的增长率。此后再加上股息增长率就可以得到股权市场的增长率。Her baseline projection is likely to have been 6.75% = 0.9% + 1.5% + 2.1% + 2.25%依照公式可得. 6.75% = 0.9% + 1.5% + 2.1% + 2.25% 该公式资本增值方面应该是三方面,G增长率、E/G增长率、P/E增长率,长期来看后两者为0,这样理解对吗?该题未提到E/G增长率,是否因为问的是长期股票收益率预测,所以就默认该项为0了?但题目又提了不考虑P/E增长率

2024-10-22 21:50 1 · 回答

NO.PZ2020012201000007问题如下Alena,CFwupting her firm’s projections for US equity returns.If she believethin the long run ththe US labor input woulgrow 0.9% perannum anlabor proctivity 1.5%, thinflation woul2.1%, ththe vinyielwoul2.25%, anththere woulno further growth in P/E, whis likely to have been her baseline projection for continuously compounlong-term US equity returns?6.75% B.5.5%C.5.85% A is correct在长期,一国股票市场的CAPITAPPRECIATION的增长率等于该国G的增长率(本题P/E增长率为0也证实了这一点)。那么本题CAPITAPPRECIATION就等于计算该国G的增长率。此后再加上股息增长率就可以得到股权市场的增长率。Her baseline projection is likely to have been 6.75% = 0.9% + 1.5% + 2.1% + 2.25%依照公式可得. 6.75% = 0.9% + 1.5% + 2.1% + 2.25% rt 这道题用到的是哪个公式,可不可以用公式的写出计算过程,是哪个知识点

2024-07-27 11:20 1 · 回答

NO.PZ2020012201000007 问题如下 Alena,CFwupting her firm’s projections for US equity returns.If she believethin the long run ththe US labor input woulgrow 0.9% perannum anlabor proctivity 1.5%, thinflation woul2.1%, ththe vinyielwoul2.25%, anththere woulno further growth in P/E, whis likely to have been her baseline projection for continuously compounlong-term US equity returns? 6.75% B.5.5% C.5.85% A is correct在长期,一国股票市场的CAPITAPPRECIATION的增长率等于该国G的增长率(本题P/E增长率为0也证实了这一点)。那么本题CAPITAPPRECIATION就等于计算该国G的增长率。此后再加上股息增长率就可以得到股权市场的增长率。Her baseline projection is likely to have been 6.75% = 0.9% + 1.5% + 2.1% + 2.25%依照公式可得. 6.75% = 0.9% + 1.5% + 2.1% + 2.25% 请问这里continuously compounlong-term US equity returns中的continuously compoun现在哪里?和直接问long-term US equity returns的求解思路有没有差别?

2024-07-22 10:43 2 · 回答

解析错误 该题不仅仅计算了该国G的长期增长率,还需要计算v.yile股票市场收益率不止 capitappreciation, 还有v.增长率,所以加了一个2.25%

2024-06-28 16:44 1 · 回答