开发者:上海品职教育科技有限公司 隐私政策详情

应用版本:4.2.11(IOS)｜3.2.5(安卓)APP下载

返回

熊孩纸 · 2024年09月07日

为什么A不对

  1. ESG
  2. Engagement and stewardship

NO.PZ2024021802000020

问题如下：

Which of the following statements is most accurate with respect to infrastructure investments? Investors should:

选项：

A.screen investments for an ESG tilt as engagement is not possible.

B.allow general partners to directly engage with the infrastructure company.

C.make ESG information and expertise available to the project company to help it develop capacity.

解释：

A. Incorrect ESG tilts are preferred for sovereign debt, not for infrastructure investments, as engagement is possible in the latter case.

B. Incorrect because with private equity investments, direct ESG engagement will be undertaken by the general partner (GP, the private equity house) rather than the limited partner (LP, the asset owner), although individual LPs may wish to engage with their GPs on the ways in which they are monitoring and acting on ESG issues across their portfolios. Therefore, this argument applies to private equity investments, not for infrastructure investments.

C. Correct because PRI recommends that investors consider eight potential mechanisms to act as engaged owners in infrastructure, including (where possible) to make ESG information and expertise available to the asset or project company to help it develop capacity.

为什么A不对呢？不是要做好尽职调查等吗？

添加评论
1 个答案

Carol文_品职助教 · 2024年09月09日

嗨，从没放弃的小努力你好：


让我们先翻译这道题：

关于基础设施投资，下列哪个陈述是最准确的？投资者应该：

A. 筛选具有环境、社会和公司治理（ESG）倾斜的投资，因为参与是不可能的。

B. 允许普通合伙人直接与基础设施公司接触。

C. 向项目公司提供 ESG 信息和专业知识，以帮助其发展能力。

为什么选 C：

  • A 选项错误原因：ESG 倾斜在主权债务投资中更受青睐，而对于基础设施投资来说，参与（engagement）是可行的。这就否定了 A 选项中所说的因为不能参与所以要筛选具有 ESG 倾斜的投资这种说法。
  • B 选项错误原因：在私募股权投资中，直接的 ESG 参与是由普通合伙人（GP，即私募股权公司）进行，而不是有限合伙人（LP，资产所有者），但这里讨论的是基础设施投资，不是私募股权投资，B 选项的规则并不适用于基础设施投资领域。
  • C 选项正确原因：责任投资原则（PRI）建议投资者考虑八种潜在机制来充当基础设施领域的积极所有者，其中包括（在可能的情况下）向资产或项目公司提供 ESG 信息和专业知识以帮助其发展能力，这符合基础设施投资中投资者可以采取的合理行动。

A 选项不对是因为对于基础设施投资来说，参与（engagement）是可能的，而 ESG 倾斜（ESG tilt）更适用于主权债务（sovereign debt），不是基础设施投资。在基础设施投资中可以通过参与来处理相关事务，而不是像 A 选项说的筛选具有 ESG 倾斜的投资且认为参与是不可能的。

----------------------------------------------
加油吧，让我们一起遇见更好的自己！

  • 1

    回答

  • 0

    关注

  • 33

    浏览
相关问题

NO.PZ2024021802000020 问题如下 Whiof the following statements is most accurate with respeto infrastructure investments? Investors shoul A.screen investments for ESG tilt engagement is not possible. B.allow generpartners to rectly engage with the infrastructure company. C.make ESG information anexpertise available to the projecompany to help it velop capacity. IncorreESG tilts are preferrefor sovereign bt, not for infrastructure investments, engagement is possible in the latter case.Incorrebecause with private equity investments, reESG engagement will unrtaken the generpartner (GP, the private equity house) rather ththe limitepartner (LP, the asset owner), although inviLPs mwish to engage with their GPs on the ways in whithey are monitoring anacting on ESG issues across their portfolios. Therefore, this argument applies to private equity investments, not for infrastructure investments.Correbecause PRI recommen thinvestors consir eight potentimechanisms to aengageowners in infrastructure, inclung (where possible) to make ESG information anexpertise available to the asset or projecompany to help it velop capacity. 为什么B不对？B讲的就是普通合伙人去做决策

2024-06-03 21:33 3 · 回答

NO.PZ2024021802000020 问题如下 Whiof the following statements is most accurate with respeto infrastructure investments? Investors shoul A.screen investments for ESG tilt engagement is not possible. B.allow generpartners to rectly engage with the infrastructure company. C.make ESG information anexpertise available to the projecompany to help it velop capacity. IncorreESG tilts are preferrefor sovereign bt, not for infrastructure investments, engagement is possible in the latter case.Incorrebecause with private equity investments, reESG engagement will unrtaken the generpartner (GP, the private equity house) rather ththe limitepartner (LP, the asset owner), although inviLPs mwish to engage with their GPs on the ways in whithey are monitoring anacting on ESG issues across their portfolios. Therefore, this argument applies to private equity investments, not for infrastructure investments.Correbecause PRI recommen thinvestors consir eight potentimechanisms to aengageowners in infrastructure, inclung (where possible) to make ESG information anexpertise available to the asset or projecompany to help it velop capacity. 为什么B不对？为什么B是applies to private equity investments, not for infrastructure investments？

2024-05-21 11:00 1 · 回答