开发者:上海品职教育科技有限公司 隐私政策详情

应用版本:4.2.11(IOS)|3.2.5(安卓)APP下载

KKII · 2024年08月28日

考试的时候是回答各个资产的权重就行,还是得把变化也写上

* 问题详情,请 查看题干

NO.PZ201803130100000401

问题如下:

Contrast, using the information provided above, the results of a reverse optimization approach with that of the MVO approach for each of the following:
i. The asset allocation mix. Justify your response.

选项:

解释:

■ The asset allocation weights for the reverse optimization method are inputs into the optimization and are determined by the market capitalization weights of the global market portfolio.

■ The asset allocation weights for the MVO method are outputs of the optimization with the expected returns, covariances, and a risk aversion coefficient used as inputs.

■ The two methods result in significantly different asset allocation mixes.

■ In contrast to MVO, the reverse optimization method results in a higher percentage point allocation to global bonds, US bonds, and global equities as well as a lower percentage point allocation to cash and US equities.

The reverse optimization method takes the asset allocation weights as its inputs that are assumed to be optimal. These weights are calculated as the market capitalization weights of a global market portfolio. In contrast, the outputs of an MVO are the asset allocation weights, which are based on (1) expected returns and covariances that are forecasted using historical data and (2) a risk aversion coefficient. The two methods result in significantly different asset allocation mixes. In contrast to MVO, the reverse optimization method results in a 4.9, 5.5, and 10.1 higher percentage point allocation to US bonds, global equities, and global bonds, respectively, and a 6.1 and 14.4 lower percentage point allocation to cash and US equities, respectively.
The asset allocation under the two methods is as follows:



考试的时候是回答各个资产的权重就行(reverse optimization这一列),还是得把变化也写上?(最后一列)




1 个答案

Lucky_品职助教 · 2024年08月29日

嗨,爱思考的PZer你好:


同学你好:


这道题让比较MVO与reverse optimization方法在资产配置上的差异,所以其实这道题主要考察的并不是计算。


这道题的主要得分点是,要说清楚reverse optimization 和MVO在asset allocation时的区别:

MVO是通过不同资产的E(Ri)、σi、以及资产之间的相关系数ρ这些input,最后求出权重分配;而reverse optimization正相反,它是以权重分配(市值权重)、σi、资产之间的相关系数ρ,重新反推出expected return,这个expected return会更靠谱,我们也叫他implied return。

基本上这些答出来后,也就是答案解析中的前三点,80%以上的分数就拿到了。


当然如果同学在考试的时候,时间还算充裕,那可以简单算一下这几类资产的市值权重,然后和MVO下求出来的权重进行比较。就是说,如果同学已经计算了市值权重,那就还是把对比的变化也写一下,要不就浪费你的计算时间了。


----------------------------------------------
虽然现在很辛苦,但努力过的感觉真的很好,加油!

  • 1

    回答
  • 0

    关注
  • 50

    浏览
相关问题

NO.PZ201803130100000401 问题如下 Contrast, using the information proviabove, the results of a reverse optimization approawith thof the MVO approafor eaof the following:i. The asset allocation mix. Justify your response. ■ The asset allocation weights for the reverse optimization methoare inputs into the optimization anare terminethe market capitalization weights of the globmarket portfolio.■ The asset allocation weights for the MVO methoare outputs of the optimization with the expectereturns, covariances, ana risk aversion coefficient useinputs.■ The two metho result in significantly fferent asset allocation mixes.■ In contrast to MVO, the reverse optimization methoresults in a higher percentage point allocation to globbon, US bon, anglobequities well a lower percentage point allocation to cash anUS equities.The reverse optimization methotakes the asset allocation weights its inputs thare assumeto optimal. These weights are calculatethe market capitalization weights of a globmarket portfolio. In contrast, the outputs of MVO are the asset allocation weights, whiare baseon (1) expectereturns ancovariances thare forecasteusing historicta an(2) a risk aversion coefficient. The two metho result in significantly fferent asset allocation mixes. In contrast to MVO, the reverse optimization methoresults in a 4.9, 5.5, an10.1 higher percentage point allocation to US bon, globequities, anglobbon, respectively, ana 6.1 an14.4 lower percentage point allocation to cash anUS equities, respectively.The asset allocation unr the two metho is follows: 如题

2024-08-04 01:09 1 · 回答

NO.PZ201803130100000401 问题如下 Contrast, using the information proviabove, the results of a reverse optimization approawith thof the MVO approafor eaof the following:i. The asset allocation mix. Justify your response. ■ The asset allocation weights for the reverse optimization methoare inputs into the optimization anare terminethe market capitalization weights of the globmarket portfolio.■ The asset allocation weights for the MVO methoare outputs of the optimization with the expectereturns, covariances, ana risk aversion coefficient useinputs.■ The two metho result in significantly fferent asset allocation mixes.■ In contrast to MVO, the reverse optimization methoresults in a higher percentage point allocation to globbon, US bon, anglobequities well a lower percentage point allocation to cash anUS equities.The reverse optimization methotakes the asset allocation weights its inputs thare assumeto optimal. These weights are calculatethe market capitalization weights of a globmarket portfolio. In contrast, the outputs of MVO are the asset allocation weights, whiare baseon (1) expectereturns ancovariances thare forecasteusing historicta an(2) a risk aversion coefficient. The two metho result in significantly fferent asset allocation mixes. In contrast to MVO, the reverse optimization methoresults in a 4.9, 5.5, an10.1 higher percentage point allocation to US bon, globequities, anglobbon, respectively, ana 6.1 an14.4 lower percentage point allocation to cash anUS equities, respectively.The asset allocation unr the two metho is follows: In contrast to MVO, the reverse optimization methoresults in a higher percentage point allocation to globbon, US bon, anglobequities well a lower percentage point allocation to cash anUS equities.为什么呢

2024-05-02 12:54 1 · 回答

NO.PZ201803130100000401 问题如下 Contrast, using the information proviabove, the results of a reverse optimization approawith thof the MVO approafor eaof the following:i. The asset allocation mix. Justify your response. ■ The asset allocation weights for the reverse optimization methoare inputs into the optimization anare terminethe market capitalization weights of the globmarket portfolio.■ The asset allocation weights for the MVO methoare outputs of the optimization with the expectereturns, covariances, ana risk aversion coefficient useinputs.■ The two metho result in significantly fferent asset allocation mixes.■ In contrast to MVO, the reverse optimization methoresults in a higher percentage point allocation to globbon, US bon, anglobequities well a lower percentage point allocation to cash anUS equities.The reverse optimization methotakes the asset allocation weights its inputs thare assumeto optimal. These weights are calculatethe market capitalization weights of a globmarket portfolio. In contrast, the outputs of MVO are the asset allocation weights, whiare baseon (1) expectereturns ancovariances thare forecasteusing historicta an(2) a risk aversion coefficient. The two metho result in significantly fferent asset allocation mixes. In contrast to MVO, the reverse optimization methoresults in a 4.9, 5.5, an10.1 higher percentage point allocation to US bon, globequities, anglobbon, respectively, ana 6.1 an14.4 lower percentage point allocation to cash anUS equities, respectively.The asset allocation unr the two metho is follows: 第一题的第二小问为什么使用CAPM来求资产大类的impliereturn?课程中何老师是说用资产大类的市值权重来求?

2024-04-23 00:12 1 · 回答

NO.PZ201803130100000401 问题如下 Contrast, using the information proviabove, the results of a reverse optimization approawith thof the MVO approafor eaof the following:i. The asset allocation mix. Justify your response. ■ The asset allocation weights for the reverse optimization methoare inputs into the optimization anare terminethe market capitalization weights of the globmarket portfolio.■ The asset allocation weights for the MVO methoare outputs of the optimization with the expectereturns, covariances, ana risk aversion coefficient useinputs.■ The two metho result in significantly fferent asset allocation mixes.■ In contrast to MVO, the reverse optimization methoresults in a higher percentage point allocation to globbon, US bon, anglobequities well a lower percentage point allocation to cash anUS equities.The reverse optimization methotakes the asset allocation weights its inputs thare assumeto optimal. These weights are calculatethe market capitalization weights of a globmarket portfolio. In contrast, the outputs of MVO are the asset allocation weights, whiare baseon (1) expectereturns ancovariances thare forecasteusing historicta an(2) a risk aversion coefficient. The two metho result in significantly fferent asset allocation mixes. In contrast to MVO, the reverse optimization methoresults in a 4.9, 5.5, an10.1 higher percentage point allocation to US bon, globequities, anglobbon, respectively, ana 6.1 an14.4 lower percentage point allocation to cash anUS equities, respectively.The asset allocation unr the two metho is follows: 想问下答题到什么程度啊?看着两个主观题提问的表述很简单,拿不准或理解不到应该答哪些点,感觉答案好长

2023-10-16 15:51 1 · 回答