开发者:上海品职教育科技有限公司 隐私政策详情

应用版本:4.2.11(IOS)|3.2.5(安卓)APP下载

翁旸勤 · 2024年08月19日

positive (best-i-class)和 active有什么本质区别么?

NO.PZ2024021801000012

问题如下:

Which of the following statements is most accurate? Best-in-class ESG strategies:

选项:

A.demonstrate incremental gains via active ownership efforts. B.use a similar investment approach to exclusionary screening. C.exhibit inconsistent ESG scores across different ratings methodologies.

解释:

C. Correct because the diversity of ESG ratings methodologies and lack of ratings convergence are a key challenge these strategies (positive alignment or best-in-class) face. They may score highly based on the portfolio manager’s methodology but score more poorly on another set of ESG metrics used by the fund’s investor or, for instance, a fund distribution platform like Morningstar. Hence, best-in-class portfolios will be tested on transparency as well as consistency.

A. Incorrect because a common criticism for best-in-class ESG strategies is that their focus yields diminishing ESG returns with little opportunity to demonstrate incremental gains via active ownership efforts.

B. Incorrect because positive alignment or best-in-class represents, to some degree, the inverse of exclusionary screening.

positive (best-i-class)和 active有什么本质区别么?

1 个答案

王岑 · 2024年08月19日

嗨,努力学习的PZer你好:


同学你好,

Active Ownership(积极所有权)强调投资者通过股东行动主义来促进公司在ESG方面的表现。投资者不仅仅关注公司的财务表现,还积极参与公司治理,通过投票、提案、与管理层对话等方式推动公司改进ESG实践,其目的是通过内部参与和公开倡导来实现公司在ESG方面的长期可持续改进。

Best-in-Class(同类最佳)通常指在特定行业内选择那些ESG表现优于同行的公司进行投资。投资者通过评估和比较同行业内不同公司的ESG表现,选择那些在ESG方面表现最好的公司,即使这些公司可能不是完美的。其目的是通过资本配置来奖励那些在ESG方面表现出色的公司,并推动整个行业向更高的ESG标准发展。

因此,best-in-class 策略的目标是在投资之前,识别和投资那些在ESG方面已经是行业领导者的公司,而Active ownership 策略的目标是在投资之后,通过积极参与来改善公司的ESG表现。

----------------------------------------------
虽然现在很辛苦,但努力过的感觉真的很好,加油!

  • 1

    回答
  • 0

    关注
  • 75

    浏览
相关问题

NO.PZ2024021801000012问题如下 Whiof the following statements is most accurate? Best-in-class ESG strategies:A.monstrate incrementgains via active ownership efforts.B.use a similinvestment approato exclusionary screening.C.exhibit inconsistent ESG scores across fferent ratings methologies. Correbecause the versity of ESG ratings methologies anlaof ratings convergenare a key challenge these strategies (positive alignment or best-in-class) face. They mscore highly baseon the portfolio manager’s methology but score more poorly on another set of ESG metriusethe funs investor or, for instance, a funstribution platform like Morningstar. Hence, best-in-class portfolios will testeon transparenwell consistency.Incorrebecause a common criticism for best-in-class ESG strategies is ththeir focus yiel minishing ESG returns with little opportunity to monstrate incrementgains via active ownership efforts.Incorrebecause positive alignment or best-in-class represents, to some gree, the inverse of exclusionary screening. 单看答案,c是对的,但c跟问题有强关联关系吗?

2024-09-09 11:15 1 · 回答

NO.PZ2024021801000012问题如下Whiof the following statements is most accurate? Best-in-class ESG strategies:A.monstrate incrementgains via active ownership efforts.B.use a similinvestment approato exclusionary screening.C.exhibit inconsistent ESG scores across fferent ratings methologies. Correbecause the versity of ESG ratings methologies anlaof ratings convergenare a key challenge these strategies (positive alignment or best-in-class) face. They mscore highly baseon the portfolio manager’s methology but score more poorly on another set of ESG metriusethe funs investor or, for instance, a funstribution platform like Morningstar. Hence, best-in-class portfolios will testeon transparenwell consistency.Incorrebecause a common criticism for best-in-class ESG strategies is ththeir focus yiel minishing ESG returns with little opportunity to monstrate incrementgains via active ownership efforts.Incorrebecause positive alignment or best-in-class represents, to some gree, the inverse of exclusionary screening. 这题不理解,请老师下。

2024-05-26 18:44 1 · 回答

NO.PZ2024021801000012 问题如下 Whiof the following statements is most accurate? Best-in-class ESG strategies: A.monstrate incrementgains via active ownership efforts. B.use a similinvestment approato exclusionary screening. C.exhibit inconsistent ESG scores across fferent ratings methologies. Incorrebecause a common criticism for best-in-class ESG strategies is ththeir focus yiel minishing ESG returns with little opportunity to monstrate incrementgains via active ownership efforts.Incorrebecause positive alignment or best-in-class represents, to some gree, the inverse of exclusionary screening.Correbecause the versity of ESG ratings methologies anlaof ratings convergenare a key challenge these strategies (positive alignment or best-in-class) face. They mscore highly baseon the portfolio manager’s methology but score more poorly on another set of ESG metriusethe funs investor or, for instance, a funstribution platform like Morningstar. Hence, best-in-class portfolios will testeon transparenwell consistency. 如题,烦请老师检查。

2024-03-09 15:11 2 · 回答