开发者:上海品职教育科技有限公司 隐私政策详情

应用版本:4.2.11(IOS)|3.2.5(安卓)APP下载

Amy_ywh · 2024年08月19日

知识框架里面47页原话不一样

NO.PZ2020021601000006

问题如下:

Viktoria Smith is a recently hired junior analyst at Aries Investments. Smith and her supervisor, Ingrid Johansson, meet to discuss some of the firm’s investments in banks and insurance companies.

Johansson asks Smith to review key performance ratios for three P&C insurers in which Aries is invested. The ratios are presented in Exhibit 1.

Based on Exhibit 1, Smith should conclude that the insurer with the most efficient underwriting operation is:

选项:

A.

Insurer A.

B.

Insurer B.

C.

Insurer C.

解释:

C is correct.

The combined ratio, which is the sum of the underwriting expense ratio and the loss and loss adjustment expense ratio, is a measure of the efficiency of an underwriting operation. A combined ratio of less than 100% is considered efficient; a combined ratio greater than 100% indicates an underwriting loss. Insurer C is the only insurer that has a combined ratio less than 100%.

解析:The combined ratio= underwriting expense ratio+ loss and loss adjustment expense ratio,三个ratio都是越低越好,低于100%的combined ratio代表有效率,大于100%的combined ratio说明收到的保费无法覆盖运营成本及理赔支出,说明保险公司的业务做的不好,在赔钱。

老师在知识框架里面写关于combined ratio:

this ratio indicates the overall efficiency of an underwriting operation. A combined ratio of less than 100 is considered efficient.


以及会不会出现combined ratio两个部分比较结果不一样的情况?比如loss and loss adjustment ratio更高但是underwriting expense ratio更低, 这个时候是优先比较combined ratio么?

1 个答案
已采纳答案

王园圆_品职助教 · 2024年08月19日

同学你好,助教没理解你说的”知识框架里面47页原话不一样“是针对哪个内容说的?

是针对中文解析中”三个ratio都是越低越好“这句话吗?这句话和讲义结论并不矛盾啊,combined ratio和 underwriting expense ratio和 loss and loss adjustment expense ratio肯定都是越低越好的,越低越说明公司在loss 控制和费用支出控制上做的好呀

但是我们考察保险公司整体运营效率的时候,还是以combination ratio为主的,即如果出现你说的”loss and loss adjustment ratio更高但是underwriting expense ratio更低“,那肯定是比较combination ratio而不是比较分项的哦