开发者:上海品职教育科技有限公司 隐私政策详情

应用版本:4.2.11(IOS)|3.2.5(安卓)APP下载

eyn · 2024年08月18日

reshoring

NO.PZ2023061903000061

问题如下:

Q. A US company expanding critical spare part inventories for local customers made at its existing Canadian facility after a supply chain disruption is most likely using the coping tactic of:

选项:

A.reshoring the essentials. B.reglobalizing production. C.doubling down on key markets.

解释:

A is correct. The COVID-19 pandemic has highlighted the need for certain essential supply chains to be rebuilt domestically for emergency situations, with availability of critical spare parts being an analogy. The close integration of the US and Canadian economies through the revised USMCA agreement effectively makes expanded production at an existing Canadian factory an example of reducing manufacturing risk by relocating to home countries via reshoring. B is incorrect because instead of reducing manufacturing risk by duplicating or fortifying its supply chain, the company is simply continuing to use its existing capacity more intensively. C is incorrect because although the production is intended to better supply its home market, there is no evidence that the company is expanding its presence in the US market or shifting its focus to the exclusion of available opportunities elsewhere.

A正确。2019冠状病毒病大流行凸显了在国内重建某些基本供应链以应对紧急情况的必要性,关键备件的可用性就是一个例子。通过修订后的美加贸易协定,美国和加拿大经济的紧密整合有效地使加拿大现有工厂的扩大生产成为通过回岸转移到本国以降低制造风险的一个例子。

B是不正确的,因为该公司没有通过复制或强化其供应链来降低制造风险,而是继续更集中地利用其现有产能。

C是不正确的,因为尽管生产是为了更好地供应其国内市场,但没有证据表明该公司正在扩大其在美国市场的存在,或者专注于排除其他地方的可用机会

reshoring是必需品回流。 美国加大了在加拿大的投资,并没有relocate back ,为什么是reshoring?

1 个答案

笛子_品职助教 · 2024年08月18日

嗨,爱思考的PZer你好:


Hello,亲爱的同学~

回流不一定是回流本国,也可以回流到盟友国。

产能放在盟友国,本国对盟友国实施一定的控制和影响,也可以保证供应链安全。


结合本题:

美国公司在美国盟友国家与美国控制国家建立工厂,这也可以保证供应链安全。不一定要在美国本土建立工厂。

加拿大与美国很近,而且加拿大是美国盟友,把产业建在加拿大,对美国公司来说是安全的。毕竟全部产业都回美国,出于成本考虑,不是太现实的。

----------------------------------------------
虽然现在很辛苦,但努力过的感觉真的很好,加油!

  • 1

    回答
  • 0

    关注
  • 57

    浏览
相关问题

NO.PZ2023061903000061 问题如下 Q. A US company expanng criticspare part inventories for loccustomers ma its existing Canafacility after a supply chain sruption is most likely using the coping tactic of: A.reshoring the essentials. B.reglobalizing proction. C.ubling wn on key markets. A is correct. The COVI19 panmic hhighlightethe neefor certain essentisupply chains to rebuilt mestically for emergensituations, with availability of criticspare parts being analogy. The close integration of the US anCanaeconomies through the reviseUSMagreement effectively makes expanproction existing Canafactory example of recing manufacturing risk relocating to home countries via reshoring. B is incorrebecause insteof recing manufacturing risk plicating or fortifying its supply chain, the company is simply continuing to use its existing capacity more intensively. C is incorrebecause although the proction is intento better supply its home market, there is no evinththe company is expanng its presenin the US market or shifting its focus to the exclusion of available opportunities elsewhere.A正确。2019冠状病毒病大流行凸显了在国内重建某些基本供应链以应对紧急情况的必要性,关键备件的可用性就是一个例子。通过修订后的美加贸易协定,美国和加拿大经济的紧密整合有效地使加拿大现有工厂的扩大生产成为通过回岸转移到本国以降低制造风险的一个例子。B是不正确的,因为该公司没有通过复制或强化其供应链来降低制造风险,而是继续更集中地利用其现有产能。C是不正确的,因为尽管生产是为了更好地供应其国内市场,但没有证据表明该公司正在扩大其在美国市场的存在,或者专注于排除其他地方的可用机会 加拿大是关键市场,在关键市场多生产一些不是C的意思吗

2024-08-29 13:14 1 · 回答

NO.PZ2023061903000061 问题如下 Q. A US company expanng criticspare part inventories for loccustomers ma its existing Canafacility after a supply chain sruption is most likely using the coping tactic of: A.reshoring the essentials. B.reglobalizing proction. C.ubling wn on key markets. A is correct. The COVI19 panmic hhighlightethe neefor certain essentisupply chains to rebuilt mestically for emergensituations, with availability of criticspare parts being analogy. The close integration of the US anCanaeconomies through the reviseUSMagreement effectively makes expanproction existing Canafactory example of recing manufacturing risk relocating to home countries via reshoring. B is incorrebecause insteof recing manufacturing risk plicating or fortifying its supply chain, the company is simply continuing to use its existing capacity more intensively. C is incorrebecause although the proction is intento better supply its home market, there is no evinththe company is expanng its presenin the US market or shifting its focus to the exclusion of available opportunities elsewhere.A正确。2019冠状病毒病大流行凸显了在国内重建某些基本供应链以应对紧急情况的必要性,关键备件的可用性就是一个例子。通过修订后的美加贸易协定,美国和加拿大经济的紧密整合有效地使加拿大现有工厂的扩大生产成为通过回岸转移到本国以降低制造风险的一个例子。B是不正确的,因为该公司没有通过复制或强化其供应链来降低制造风险,而是继续更集中地利用其现有产能。C是不正确的,因为尽管生产是为了更好地供应其国内市场,但没有证据表明该公司正在扩大其在美国市场的存在,或者专注于排除其他地方的可用机会 再全球化为啥不对

2024-08-06 19:11 1 · 回答