开发者:上海品职教育科技有限公司 隐私政策详情

应用版本:4.2.11(IOS)｜3.2.5(安卓)APP下载

返回

cy g. · 2024年08月15日

如题

  1. CFA III
  2. Equity

NO.PZ2019012201000079

问题如下：

Which of following is correct regarding on Implementation Constraints?

选项：

A.

Twice the absolute risk will lead to twice the return.

B.

Markowitz efficient frontier shows that the relationship between return and risk is convex.

C.

There is a level of leverage beyond which volatility reduces expected returns.

解释：

C is corrent. Portfolios may face implementation constraints that decrease the IR if active risk increases beyond a specific level; Portfolios with high absolute risk targets face limited diversification opportunities, which may lead to a decrease in the SR. There is a level of leverage beyond which volatility reduces expected returns.

主要是说当杠杆过高，虽然可能会带来收益，但是风险也会增加，带来更大的波动，反而会降低收益。打个比方，昨天跌了10%，今天涨了10%，看起来好像是一样的。但是实际不是一回事，反而是亏损的（亏损1%），加杠杆后会进一步降低收益。

There may be constraints that prevent Manager A from scaling his active weights.So twice the absolute risk will not lead to twice the return, Markowitz efficient frontier shows that the relationship between return and risk is concave.

b选项为什么不对

添加评论
1 个答案

笛子_品职助教 · 2024年08月16日

嗨，从没放弃的小努力你好：


b选项为什么不对

Hello，亲爱的同学~

B选项：有效前沿显示，收益和风险的关系是凸的，这句话是错的。

应该改为：有效前沿显示，收益和风险的关系是凹的。这才对。

也就是说，把convex改为concave。


convex指的是，随着风险每增加一单位，收益的增加大于一单位，并且会越来越多。

concave指的是，随着风险每增加一单位，收益的增加会小于一单位，而且会增加得越来越少。


可以简单记忆为：convex就是好的，赚多亏少。concave是不好的，赚少亏多。

图形上也可以看出来，随着风险（variance）的增加，收益（expected return）增加得越来越少。是concave的。


----------------------------------------------
就算太阳没有迎着我们而来，我们正在朝着它而去，加油！

  • 1

    回答

  • 0

    关注

  • 111

    浏览
相关问题

NO.PZ2019012201000079 问题如下 Whiof following is correregarng on Implementation Constraints? A.Twithe absolute risk will leto twithe return. B.Markowitz efficient frontier shows ththe relationship between return anrisk is convex. C.There is a level of leverage beyonwhivolatility reces expectereturns. C is corrent. Portfolios mfaimplementation constraints thcrease the IR if active risk increases beyona specific level; Portfolios with high absolute risk targets falimiteversification opportunities, whimleto a crease in the SR. There is a level of leverage beyonwhivolatility reces expectereturns. 主要是说当杠杆过高，虽然可能会带来收益，但是风险也会增加，带来更大的波动，反而会降低收益。打个比方，昨天跌了10%，今天涨了10%，看起来好像是一样的。但是实际不是一回事，反而是亏损的（亏损1%），加杠杆后会进一步降低收益。There mconstraints thprevent Manager A from scaling his active weights.So twithe absolute risk will not leto twithe return, Markowitz efficient frontier shows ththe relationship between return anrisk is concave. 如题

2024-07-19 07:44 1 · 回答

NO.PZ2019012201000079 问题如下 Whiof following is correregarng on Implementation Constraints? A.Twithe absolute risk will leto twithe return. B.Markowitz efficient frontier shows ththe relationship between return anrisk is convex. C.There is a level of leverage beyonwhivolatility reces expectereturns. C is corrent. Portfolios mfaimplementation constraints thcrease the IR if active risk increases beyona specific level; Portfolios with high absolute risk targets falimiteversification opportunities, whimleto a crease in the SR. There is a level of leverage beyonwhivolatility reces expectereturns. 主要是说当杠杆过高，虽然可能会带来收益，但是风险也会增加，带来更大的波动，反而会降低收益。打个比方，昨天跌了10%，今天涨了10%，看起来好像是一样的。但是实际不是一回事，反而是亏损的（亏损1%），加杠杆后会进一步降低收益。There mconstraints thprevent Manager A from scaling his active weights.So twithe absolute risk will not leto twithe return, Markowitz efficient frontier shows ththe relationship between return anrisk is concave. 还是limitation of return achievebearing risk下面分的几点没有这么严格分类

2024-07-18 05:08 1 · 回答

NO.PZ2019012201000079问题如下Whiof following is correregarng on Implementation Constraints? A.Twithe absolute risk will leto twithe return.B.Markowitz efficient frontier shows ththe relationship between return anrisk is convex.C.There is a level of leverage beyonwhivolatility reces expectereturns. C is corrent. Portfolios mfaimplementation constraints thcrease the IR if active risk increases beyona specific level; Portfolios with high absolute risk targets falimiteversification opportunities, whimleto a crease in the SR. There is a level of leverage beyonwhivolatility reces expectereturns. 主要是说当杠杆过高，虽然可能会带来收益，但是风险也会增加，带来更大的波动，反而会降低收益。打个比方，昨天跌了10%，今天涨了10%，看起来好像是一样的。但是实际不是一回事，反而是亏损的（亏损1%），加杠杆后会进一步降低收益。There mconstraints thprevent Manager A from scaling his active weights.So twithe absolute risk will not leto twithe return, Markowitz efficient frontier shows ththe relationship between return anrisk is concave. 如标题 c没看懂 能在讲讲吗？

2024-06-07 12:54 1 · 回答

NO.PZ2019012201000079 问题如下 Whiof following is correregarng on Implementation Constraints? A.Twithe absolute risk will leto twithe return. B.Markowitz efficient frontier shows ththe relationship between return anrisk is convex. C.There is a level of leverage beyonwhivolatility reces expectereturns. C is corrent. Portfolios mfaimplementation constraints thcrease the IR if active risk increases beyona specific level; Portfolios with high absolute risk targets falimiteversification opportunities, whimleto a crease in the SR. There is a level of leverage beyonwhivolatility reces expectereturns. 主要是说当杠杆过高，虽然可能会带来收益，但是风险也会增加，带来更大的波动，反而会降低收益。打个比方，昨天跌了10%，今天涨了10%，看起来好像是一样的。但是实际不是一回事，反而是亏损的（亏损1%），加杠杆后会进一步降低收益。There mconstraints thprevent Manager A from scaling his active weights.So twithe absolute risk will not leto twithe return, Markowitz efficient frontier shows ththe relationship between return anrisk is concave. 马科维茨是个CONVX关系啊？

2024-03-31 22:28 2 · 回答