开发者:上海品职教育科技有限公司 隐私政策详情

应用版本:4.2.11(IOS)|3.2.5(安卓)APP下载

伊 · 2024年08月12日

题意包括后续计划的价值吗

NO.PZ2023040501000061

问题如下:

Since 2010, annual executive compensation has included stock options on the company’s stock. On 1 September 2013, the company introduced a restricted stock grant program for all non-executive employees who had worked for the company for three years or more.

The average volatility of the company’s stock had been in the range of 38–42% during 2008–2010, but since 2011, it has declined to the 19–24% range.

If the recent changes in the volatility of the company's stock persist, it will most likely affect the company's compensation expense for:

选项:

A.

both non-executive employees and executives.

B.

non-executive employees only.

C.

executives only.

解释:

Only the executive stock option plan is affected by volatility of the company’s stock. The volatility affects the initial valuation of the stock options granted (e.g., through use of the Black–Scholes model to determine the fair value of the options). The initial valuation of the options determines the expense recognized. Compensation expense for stock grants is based on the fair market value of the stock on the day of the grant and is not affected by the stock’s volatility.

关于option,题干里说是annual,即每年都grant一批option。波动率既影响2011年option被grant时计算的FV,也会影响后续每年grant的FV。因此option肯定会受影响。题意本身包括后续每年grant的option吗?

此外,关于RS,2013年grant一批,此时已经波动率减小了,为什么波动率不会影响grant时股票的market value呢?波动率大和波动率小不是股价市价的影响因素吗?

1 个答案

王园圆_品职助教 · 2024年08月12日

同学你好,1.员工股权激励的option的价值确定,是用grant当年的一系列市场因素结合期权定价模型计算出来的,但是一旦确定,之后就不会再发生变化了就固定了,不会因为后面年份市场波动变大变小再调整前一年或前几年的option价值的,公司记账永远都用最开始grant那天确认的那个价值进行记账了——针对高管的option,题目的意思是,相比较之前高达38%-42%的波动率导致的option当年的价值会更高来说,从2011年的option的波动率下降,会导致2011年确认的option 价值相比以前年度更低

你说的”波动率既影响2011年option被grant时计算的FV,也会影响后续每年grant的FV。“对公司记账来说,是不存在这种情况的哦

2.关于RSU,股价是由当天该股票的市场供需决定的,和当时股价本身的波动大小无关,所以RSU的价值决定不受波动率大小的影响

  • 1

    回答
  • 0

    关注
  • 44

    浏览
相关问题

NO.PZ2023040501000061 问题如下 Sin2010, annuexecutive compensation hinclustooptions on the company’s stock. On 1 September 2013, the company introcea restrictestogrant progrfor all non-executive employees who hworkefor the company for three years or more. The average volatility of the company’s stohbeen in the range of 38–42% ring 2008–2010, but sin2011, it hclineto the 19–24% range.If the recent changes in the volatility of the company's stopersist, it will most likely affethe company's compensation expense for: A.both non-executive employees anexecutives. B.non-executive employees only. C.executives only. Only the executive stooption plis affectevolatility of the company’s stock. The volatility affects the initivaluation of the stooptions grante(e.g., through use of the Black–Scholes mol to termine the fair value of the options). The initivaluation of the options termines the expense recognize Compensation expense for stogrants is baseon the fair market value of the stoon the y of the grant anis not affectethe stock’s volatility. stooption 按照授予日当天的FV计量,后续option的波动不影响已经grant 的option value吧,是否 只 影响后续新grant 的 option ?

2023-08-13 10:23 2 · 回答

NO.PZ2023040501000061 问题如下 Sin2010, annuexecutive compensation hinclustooptions on the company’s stock. On 1 September 2013, the company introcea restrictestogrant progrfor all non-executive employees who hworkefor the company for three years or more. The average volatility of the company’s stohbeen in the range of 38–42% ring 2008–2010, but sin2011, it hclineto the 19–24% range.If the recent changes in the volatility of the company's stopersist, it will most likely affethe company's compensation expense for: A.both non-executive employees anexecutives. B.non-executive employees only. C.executives only. Only the executive stooption plis affectevolatility of the company’s stock. The volatility affects the initivaluation of the stooptions grante(e.g., through use of the Black–Scholes mol to termine the fair value of the options). The initivaluation of the options termines the expense recognize Compensation expense for stogrants is baseon the fair market value of the stoon the y of the grant anis not affectethe stock’s volatility. 1.高管从2010年或得期权,此时的波动性还是很高的,期权价值也高。在对这批期权费用摊销时不受影响,因为摊销的是期权的初始授权日的fair value。2.从2011年波动性答复下降,那么期权的价值下降。3.在2013.1.1日授予普通员工一批期权,此时波动性已经下降了,期权价值也会下降。因此,受到影响的应该是普通员工的期权啊,而高管的期权expense不受影响,我理解应该这样啊,对吗?

2023-07-24 17:08 1 · 回答