开发者:上海品职教育科技有限公司 隐私政策详情

应用版本:4.2.11(IOS)|3.2.5(安卓)APP下载

Sophia · 2024年07月30日

b为什么错呢

NO.PZ2023010903000058

问题如下:

On viewing Exhibit 1, Shaw makes the following comments about the MFC Value Fund:

l The small-cap tilt helped.

l Value funds were out of favor, as shown by the Value factor results.

l Of course, the MFC Value Fund must have a lower alpha because its performance was 0.03 percentage point worse than its benchmark.

Which of Shaw’s comments about the MFC Value Fund in Exhibit 1 is most accurate? The comment concerning:

选项:

A.

alpha

B.

small-cap tilt

C.

value being out of favor

解释:

Shaw’s comment about a small-cap tilt is correct. Additional exposure to smaller firms resulted in a positive performance of 0.02% for the Size factor.

A is incorrect. Alpha is defined here to include performance unexplained by the factors and matches that of the benchmark.

C is incorrect. Although the value style does appear to be out of favor as shown by the lower return than that of the market (0.66% versus 0.71%), the Value factor has a positive contribution to the return (0.08%).

罗素1000不就是一个小盘股指数吗?然后return是负的

2 个答案

笛子_品职助教 · 2024年07月31日

嗨,从没放弃的小努力你好:


我的意思是 罗素1000是小盘股指数 它的return是负数。而咱们这个fund是正数 那么就不应该是small cap tilt呀

是否是size,不看return,看系数coefficient。

本题并没有给coefficient数据,默认portfolio与benchmark,使用了相同的Factor。

使用了相同Factor不代表收益要相同。

portfolio投资了小盘股ABC,benchmark投资了小盘股DEF。都是小盘股,但ABC收益高于DEF也是可以的。


----------------------------------------------
虽然现在很辛苦,但努力过的感觉真的很好,加油!

zhenyu · 2024年08月05日

我也是纠结在这个small cap tilt上,想法跟你一样“罗素1000是小盘股指数 它的return是负数。而咱们这个fund是正数 ”,不正说明他underweight small cap 么

笛子_品职助教 · 2024年07月30日

嗨,努力学习的PZer你好:


b为什么错呢

Hello,亲爱的同学~

B是正确的。

我们看解析里这句话:Shaw’s comment about a small-cap tilt is correct

----------------------------------------------
虽然现在很辛苦,但努力过的感觉真的很好,加油!

Sophia · 2024年07月30日

我的意思是 罗素1000是小盘股指数 它的return是负数。而咱们这个fund是正数 那么就不应该是small cap tilt呀

  • 2

    回答
  • 1

    关注
  • 75

    浏览
相关问题

NO.PZ2023010903000058 问题如下 On viewing Exhibit 1, Shmakes the following comments about the MFC Value Funl The small-ctilt helpel Value fun were out of favor, shown the Value factor results.l Of course, the MFC Value Funmust have a lower alpha because its performanw0.03 percentage point worse thits benchmark.Whiof Shaw’s comments about the MFC Value Funin Exhibit 1 is most accurate? The comment concerning: A.alph B.small-ctilt C.value being out of favor Shaw’s comment about a small-ctilt is correct. Aitionexposure to smaller firms resultein a positive performanof 0.02% for the Size factor.A is incorrect. Alpha is finehere to inclu performanunexplainethe factors anmatches thof the benchmark.C is incorrect. Although the value style es appeto out of favor shown the lower return ththof the market (0.66% versus 0.71%), the Value factor ha positive contribution to the return (0.08%). 1、关于alpha的解析没有看懂,请老师再详细分析一下

2024-07-24 23:48 2 · 回答

NO.PZ2023010903000058 问题如下 On viewing Exhibit 1, Shmakes the following comments about the MFC Value Funl The small-ctilt helpel Value fun were out of favor, shown the Value factor results.l Of course, the MFC Value Funmust have a lower alpha because its performanw0.03 percentage point worse thits benchmark.Whiof Shaw’s comments about the MFC Value Funin Exhibit 1 is most accurate? The comment concerning: A.alph B.small-ctilt C.value being out of favor Shaw’s comment about a small-ctilt is correct. Aitionexposure to smaller firms resultein a positive performanof 0.02% for the Size factor.A is incorrect. Alpha is finehere to inclu performanunexplainethe factors anmatches thof the benchmark.C is incorrect. Although the value style es appeto out of favor shown the lower return ththof the market (0.66% versus 0.71%), the Value factor ha positive contribution to the return (0.08%). Fun比于benchmark的超额,一般不是也叫alpha吗?这里不是MFC是小于benchmark吗?另外,这里market是干嘛的?一般我们只和benchmark比吧?需要观察market吗?

2024-07-16 16:47 1 · 回答

NO.PZ2023010903000058 问题如下 On viewing Exhibit 1, Shmakes the following comments about the MFC Value Funl The small-ctilt helpel Value fun were out of favor, shown the Value factor results.l Of course, the MFC Value Funmust have a lower alpha because its performanw0.03 percentage point worse thits benchmark.Whiof Shaw’s comments about the MFC Value Funin Exhibit 1 is most accurate? The comment concerning: A.alph B.small-ctilt C.value being out of favor Shaw’s comment about a small-ctilt is correct. Aitionexposure to smaller firms resultein a positive performanof 0.02% for the Size factor.A is incorrect. Alpha is finehere to inclu performanunexplainethe factors anmatches thof the benchmark.C is incorrect. Although the value style es appeto out of favor shown the lower return ththof the market (0.66% versus 0.71%), the Value factor ha positive contribution to the return (0.08%). 通过图表能看出来是size有贡献,但是怎么能判断出来是小市值small cap有帮助呢,从哪里看出来的?

2024-07-05 17:16 1 · 回答

NO.PZ2023010903000058 问题如下 On viewing Exhibit 1, Shmakes the following comments about the MFC Value Funl The small-ctilt helpel Value fun were out of favor, shown the Value factor results.l Of course, the MFC Value Funmust have a lower alpha because its performanw0.03 percentage point worse thits benchmark.Whiof Shaw’s comments about the MFC Value Funin Exhibit 1 is most accurate? The comment concerning: A.alph B.small-ctilt C.value being out of favor Shaw’s comment about a small-ctilt is correct. Aitionexposure to smaller firms resultein a positive performanof 0.02% for the Size factor.A is incorrect. Alpha is finehere to inclu performanunexplainethe factors anmatches thof the benchmark.C is incorrect. Although the value style es appeto out of favor shown the lower return ththof the market (0.66% versus 0.71%), the Value factor ha positive contribution to the return (0.08%). RT

2024-02-10 11:51 1 · 回答