开发者:上海品职教育科技有限公司 隐私政策详情

应用版本:4.2.11(IOS)|3.2.5(安卓)APP下载

180****7655 · 2024年07月28日

非执行董事

NO.PZ2024021801000039

问题如下:

Which of the following would be considered the most effective form of investor engagement?

选项:

A.Initiating a dialogue with the investee company following a share price fall

B.Highlighting concerns about long-term key issues to non-executive directors of the investee company

C.Requesting information on specific governance, social or environmental issues from the investee company

解释:

A. Incorrect because very often, a desire to engage arises from a share price fall. Active fund managers may then become concerned about issues that may have been apparent for a time but which may have been ignored as the performance was positive. Experience tends to show that such knee-jerk engagement is less likely to be effective than long-standing consistent messaging (where intensity may increase at moments of difficulty, but do not just begin at those moments).

B. Correct because engagement dialogues are conversations between investors and any level of the investee entity (including non-executive directors) featuring a two-way sharing of perspectives, such that the investors express their position on key issues, and in particular, highlight any concerns that they may have. In addition, engagement is set in a context of long-term ownership and focus on long-term value preservation and creation, so that engagement is aligned with investment thesis.

C. Incorrect because investors seeking insights is part of a monitoring dialogue and not an engagement dialogue. Monitoring is typified by detailed and specific questioning; investors seeking insights. In addition, two-way dialogue and expression of clear positions is necessary for engagement to deliver on its intended outcomes, of changed company behaviors and so on.

和被投资公司这个对话有特定的人员范围吗?除了非执行董事还有谁呢?非执行董事是什么呢?

阿里 · 2024年11月03日

我也被非执行董事这个词给迷惑住了

1 个答案

Carol文_品职助教 · 2024年07月28日

嗨,从没放弃的小努力你好:


问题:以下哪一种被认为是最有效的投资者参与形式?

选项: A. 在股价下跌后与被投资公司进行对话 B. 向被投资公司的非执行董事提出对长期关键问题的担忧 C. 向被投资公司请求关于特定治理、社会或环境问题的信息


非执行董事(Non-Executive Directors, NEDs)是公司董事会成员,他们不参与公司的日常管理。但他们主要负责监督和提供独立的建议,确保管理层的决策符合股东和公司整体利益。

参与对话的特定人员范围

  1. 非执行董事(NEDs):他们提供独立的监督和建议,是投资者表达长期关键问题担忧的合适对象。
  2. 执行董事(Executive Directors):这些董事参与公司的日常管理,投资者可以直接与他们讨论具体的运营和战略问题。
  3. 高级管理层(Senior Management):包括CEO、CFO等高级管理人员,他们可以对公司的战略方向和日常运营提供深入的见解。
  4. 投资者关系团队(Investor Relations Team):专门处理投资者与公司的沟通,能够提供公司财务、战略和业绩等方面的信息。

非执行董事的角色

  • 监督和问责:确保公司管理层的行为符合股东和公司整体利益。
  • 战略指导:提供独立和客观的意见,帮助公司制定和评估战略决策。
  • 风险管理:帮助识别和评估公司的风险,确保有效的风险管理措施到位。

解释

这道题不在于参与对话的人员范围,而在于选项A和C有根本性的错误:

  • A选项不正确:因为如果参与的意愿仅仅是由股价下跌引发的,这种反应性的参与不太可能像长期一致的信息传递那样有效。
  • B选项正确:因为参与对话是投资者与被投资公司任何层级之间的对话(包括非执行董事),这是一种双向的观点交流,投资者表达他们对关键问题的立场,特别是强调他们可能有的任何担忧。此外,参与是在长期所有权和关注长期价值保存和创造的背景下进行的,因此参与与投资理论一致。
  • C选项不正确:因为投资者寻求洞察力是监控对话的一部分,而不是参与对话。监控通常以详细和具体的问题为特点;投资者寻求洞察力。此外,两方对话和明确表达立场对于参与来说是必要的,以实现预期的结果,例如改变公司的行为等。

----------------------------------------------
就算太阳没有迎着我们而来,我们正在朝着它而去,加油!

157****0450 · 2024年10月11日

那如果有的题目里面有两个选项,一个是向非执行董事表达long-term问题的担忧,一个是向执行董事表达long-term问题的担忧,问哪个是effective engagement,是选执行董事么?

  • 1

    回答
  • 2

    关注
  • 321

    浏览
相关问题

NO.PZ2024021801000039 问题如下 Whiof the following woulconsirethe most effective form of investor engagement? A.Initiating a alogue with the investee company following a share prifall B.Highlighting concerns about long-term key issues to non-executive rectors of the investee company C.Requesting information on specific governance, socior environmentissues from the investee company Incorrebecause very often, a sire to engage arises from a share prifall. Active funmanagers mthen become concerneabout issues thmhave been apparent for a time but whimhave been ignorethe performanwpositive. Experienten to show thsuknee-jerk engagement is less likely to effective thlong-stanng consistent messaging (where intensity mincrease moments of fficulty, but not just begin those moments).Correbecause engagement alogues are conversations between investors anany level of the investee entity (inclung non-executive rectors) featuring a two-wsharing of perspectives, suththe investors express their position on key issues, anin particular, highlight any concerns ththey mhave. In aition, engagement is set in a context of long-term ownership anfocus on long-term value preservation ancreation, so thengagement is alignewith investment thesis.Incorrebecause investors seeking insights is part of a monitoring alogue annot engagement alogue. Monitoring is typifietaileanspecific questioning; investors seeking insights. In aition, two-walogue anexpression of clepositions is necessary for engagement to liver on its intenoutcomes, of changecompany behaviors anso on. 如题

2024-03-05 10:22 2 · 回答