开发者:上海品职教育科技有限公司 隐私政策详情

应用版本:4.2.11(IOS)|3.2.5(安卓)APP下载

Brocolli · 2024年07月28日

forward和futures的流动性,谁比较好?

NO.PZ2022123002000021

问题如下:

Rosario Delgado is an investment manager in Spain. Delgado’s client, Max Rivera, seeks assistance with his well-diversified investment portfolio denominated in US dollars.

Rivera’s reporting currency is the euro, and he is concerned about his US dollar exposure. His portfolio IPS requires monthly rebalancing, at a minimum. The portfolio’s market value is USD2.5 million. Given Rivera’s risk aversion, Delgado is considering a monthly hedge using either a one-month forward contract or one-month futures contract.

Determine which type of hedge instrument combination is most appropriate for Rivera’s situation. Justify your selection.

选项:

解释:

Correct Answer:

The hedge instrument combination most appropriate for Rivera’s portfolio is a dynamic forward hedge for the reasons noted below.

First, a dynamic hedge is most appropriate here. A static hedge (i.e., unchanging hedge) will avoid transaction costs but will also tend to accumulate unwanted currency exposures as the value of the foreign-currency assets change. This characteristic will cause a mismatch between the market value of the foreign-currency asset portfolio and the nominal size of the forward contract used for the currency hedge; this is pure currency risk. Given this potential mismatch and because both Rivera and Delgado are risk averse, Delgado should implement a dynamic hedge by rebalancing the portfolio at least on a monthly basis.

Delgado must assess the cost–benefit trade-offs of how frequently to dynamically rebalance the hedge. This depends on a variety of factors (manager risk aversion, market view, IPS guidelines). The higher the degree of risk aversion, the more frequently the hedge is likely to be rebalanced back to the “neutral” hedge ratio.

A forward contract is more suitable because in comparison to a futures contract, a forward contract is more flexible in terms of currency pair, settlement date, and transaction amount. Forward contracts are also simpler than futures contracts from an administrative standpoint owing to the absence of margin requirements, reducing portfolio management expense. Finally, forward contracts are more liquid than futures for trading in large sizes because the daily trade volume for OTC currency forward contracts dwarfs those for exchange-traded futures contracts.

如题

1 个答案

pzqa35 · 2024年07月29日

嗨,从没放弃的小努力你好:


在通常情况下,futures由于是交易所交易的产品,所以流动性比forward好,但是外汇市场相对特殊,参与者大都是一些大型机构,违约风险较小,且forward可以定制化,所以在外汇市场是,forward的流动性会更好。

----------------------------------------------
就算太阳没有迎着我们而来,我们正在朝着它而去,加油!

  • 1

    回答
  • 1

    关注
  • 95

    浏览
相关问题

NO.PZ2022123002000021问题如下 Rosario lga is aninvestment manager in Spain. lga’s client, MRiverseeks assistancewith his well-versifieinvestment portfolio nominatein US llars.Rivera’s reportingcurrenis the euro, anhe is concerneabout his US llexposure. Hisportfolio IPS requires monthly rebalancing, a minimum. The portfolio’smarket value is US.5 million. Given Rivera’s risk aversion, lga isconsiring a monthly hee using either a one-month forwarcontraorone-month futures contract.termine whitype ofhee instrument combination is most appropriate for Rivera’s situation.Justify your selection. CorreAnswer:The hee instrument combination most appropriate for Rivera’s portfolio is a namic forwarhee for thereasons notebelow.First, a namichee is most appropriate here. A static hee (i.e., unchanging hee) willavoitransaction costs but will also tento accumulate unwantecurrenexposuresthe value of the foreign-currenassets change. This characteristic willcause a mismatbetween the market value of the foreign-currenassetportfolio anthe nominsize of the forwarcontrausefor the currencyhee; this is pure currenrisk. Given this potentimismatanbecauseboth Rivera anlga are risk averse, lga shoulimplement a namichee rebalancing the portfolio least on a monthly basis.lga mustassess the cost–benefit tra-offs of how frequently to namically rebalancethe hee. This pen on a variety of factors (manager risk aversion, marketview, IPS guilines). The higher the gree of risk aversion, the morefrequently the hee is likely to rebalancebato the “neutral” heeratio.A forwarcontractis more suitable because in comparison to a futures contract, a forwarontrais more flexible in terms of currenpair, settlement te, anransaction amount. Forwarcontracts are also simpler thfutures contractsfrom ainistrative stanoint owing to the absenof margin requirements,recing portfolio management expense. Finally, forwarcontracts are moreliquithfutures for trang in large sizes because the ily tra volumefor OTC currenforwarcontracts arfs those for exchange-trafuturescontracts. ????????????

2024-01-31 07:51 1 · 回答