In researching EnergyAlgae, Tang finds that potential customers and suppliers of EnergyAlgae are highly skeptical of the claims made regarding the company’s respective products. She also contacts several energy companies and is unable to locate anyone who has even heard of EnergyAlgae. When Tang reviews CleanTech’s trading activity in EnergyAlgae shares, she finds that CleanTech liquidated its position in EnergyAlgae soon after CleanTech’s portfolio managers presented positive views on EnergyAlgae in a number of media interviews. In addition, many of CleanTech’s employees also sold their shares in EnergyAlgae immediately after CleanTech sold its shares of the company. The share price of EnergyAlgae dropped dramatically after the stock sales made by CleanTech and its employees.
The EnergyAlgae trades are least likely to have violated the CFA Institute Standards of Professional Conduct with regard to:
A.
the adverse and skeptical opinions of EnergyAlgae products.
B.
the order in which the shares were traded.
C.
share price distortion because of positive media presentations.
这题目 我是排除法 选出来的
CleanTech’s portfolio managers散布虚假的正向评论把股价抬高后，公司立即清仓EnergyAlgae股票，然后CleanTech的雇员也清仓了EnergyAlgae的股票，所以 A 和 C 都是违反了 MNI 这一条款吧
我这理解对吧？
